Minister of Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu said on Tuesday (10 December) that she did not find the controversial “brownface” advertisement that sparked public outrage earlier this year problematic.
The advertisement, which was an advertising campaign by e-payment firm Nets, featured Mediacorp actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races.
Mr Chew was seen dressed up as different races in Singapore such as an Indian man with darkened skin as well as a Malay woman in a headscarf in the advertisement. He also portrayed the role of a Chinese woman in a pink jacket and a Chinese man with a moustache in the advertisement.
As expected, the ad did not go down too well the public, with many criticising the need to use one person to play different roles instead of hiring people of the actual races to play the characters.
It even prompted Singaporean influencer and comedian, Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, to release a rap video attacking the video in vulgarities for being racist.
The video titled “K. Muthusamy” contains offensive content. In the video, the siblings can be seen repeatedly uttering “Chinese people always out here f***king it up”, while condemning Chinese Singaporeans who they claim are racist and exploit minorities for money.
On the other hand, Subhas was also dressed similarly to the brown-toned look by Chew in the original advertisement.
In response to this, Ms Fu said that she personally didn’t find the ad by Nets problematic because if were to look at it in the context that DJ Chew is someone who is known to cross-dress and portray multiple roles.
However, she did warn the public that they need to have sensitivity in knowing when not to cross the line.
“Does it make people angry, does it cause ill-will? If so, I think we should err on the side of caution,” Mr Fu noted.
The Minister told this while speaking to approximately 300 students at a dialogue on race relations during the OnePeople.sg Model United Nations opening ceremony held at Yishun Innova Junior College.
The OnePeople.sg Model United Nations is a yearly event that sees youths from the age 13 to 20 debate national cultural issues with the focus on racial and religious harmony. This year is its fifth edition.

Societal standards have changed

While at the dialogue, a student from Marsiling Secondary School asked Ms Fu if she could tolerate the publication of the “brownface” ad in her capacity as a Minister. The student also asked Ms Fu’s view on how she thought the Government handled the issue.
As a reply, Ms Fu explained that all Nets was trying to portray was how one single card can be used by people from all walks of life, regardless of their backgrounds.
She added that the incident is a great example of how societal standards have changed.
“What’s wrong and what was right in the past may not be wrong or right now. And I think we need to make adjustment in order to take into consideration the standard expected from the public,” she pointed out.
Ms Fu also went on to say that the characters portrayed in the “brownface” ad were not derogatory, but in fact just “ordinary folks” with different roles like a housewife and worker.
She also said that the majority of grassroots leaders and residents, including Indians, whom she sounded out on did not find the ad offensive.

Rap video is offensive

However, the rap video by Nair siblings was “a different question” as it used very foul language, the Minister said.
“If we said, ‘Okay, let’s not do anything about this’ – in the heat of the moment, if a Chinese made a similar rude video about minorities with profanity, what would that do to the relationship between the two races?” she asked.
Additionally, the Minister also highlighted that Ms Nair’s video channel had “made fun of Chinese New Year”, which could be interpreted as being insensitive.
The Minister stressed that apart from the Chinese cheongsam, she occasionally wears the Indian saris and Malay sarong kebayas, and hoped that they would not come a day where she wold not be able to do so.
“I really do not want to go to an extent where someone says ‘Okay, Minister, you are Chinese, you cannot wear a sari. Because a sari is not (part of) your race, your culture – and if you wear a sari, it is an appropriation of my culture. I really would not like to see that day,” she said.
She added, “I would like to see that we are celebrating our diversity.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Friends, family, and Singapore mourn the death of young actor Aloysius Pang

The announcement of Aloysius Pang’s death triggered an outpouring of grief from…

Abolish the ISA and set up a Commission on Inquiry to foster national unity

~by: Tan Jee Say~ The Ministry of Home Affairs said on Friday…

亲睹日环食奇观 多人午时外出“看太阳”

阔别了21年再现的日环食天文奇观,吸引人们关注,多名业者趁着用餐时间离开办公室,到屋外“看”太阳。 日环食于今天(26日)中午11时许,将近12时开始,在中午1时就看到有不少民众走上大街,开始查看日环食的景象。 有的民众甚至为了能够取得“最佳景观”,在大路中间的路墩抬头观看。 有者则在家中设置好观看奇景的望远镜,以便能够亲眼目睹。 社交媒体和手机交流应用程序也不断有日环食的照片及视频流传开来,让其他被困在办公室内、或受天气影响无法看到此自然奇景的民众,也能一饱眼福。 甚至有网民用日环食搞怪,P图成为包公额头的白月亮、CPF(中央公积金局缩写)等。 日环食是指当太阳、月球和地球排成一直线时,月球会阻挡了太阳的光照射到地球的层面,人们抬头看就好似“太阳被吃掉了”一般,慢慢形成一个好似金戒指般的圆环。 除了我国,在马来西亚的柔佛州和砂拉越州也能够看得到日环食此奇景。

考量体弱者应对医疗开销 读者吁屋契回购计划应更弹性化

建屋发展局处长(分局运作)林丽丽,于本月17日在《海峡时报》回应一读者观点,重申符合屋契回购计划(LBS)的年龄为65岁,不过该局将检讨让年龄标准更为弹性化,特别是让那些面对健康和财务问题的群体能受惠。 事缘一名读者撰写评论,提出屋契回购计划应该对乐龄群体更为亲善些。 名为郑春斐(译音)的民众,提出老一辈许多夫妇,丈夫多年长于妻子,假设丈夫已65岁,但是妻子才53岁,夫妇俩都不能参与屋契回购计划。 “直到妻子也迈入65岁,两人才符合资格,这时丈夫都已经77岁了。”只要丈夫与妻子间年龄差距越大,其中一人能透过屋契回购,享有退休福利的时间就越短。 体弱年长者面对医疗和生活双负担 为此,他建议有关计划的合格条件应更弹性些,特别是有者也因为健康原因提早退休,是否也能够让他们善用计划来保障退休后的收入?特别是他们还要面对医疗和生活开销的双负担? 同时,郑春斐也质疑,为何透过售卖屋契的所得,非得注入公积金退休户口不可? 这让年长者的财务管理选择不多,一些年长者公积金户口本本就没有多少储蓄、且急需现钱用在医疗和退休生活开销。 “屋契回购计划的设定,应让年长者获得更实质的帮助,让他们拥有可支配收入。” 该读者也提出,建屋局并没有阐明,在出售部分屋契后,屋主是否还能出租整间房子,如此屋主可以和子女一起居住,又能从房租中获取额外收入。 对此,林丽丽强调,屋契回购计划让年长者,可回售组屋部分屋契给政府,藉此为退休生活换取稳定、持续的收入。 回售组屋的所得,…