It was reported in an article by the Channel News Asia (CNA) that police are investigating activist and founder of Transitioning.org (a support site for the unemployed) following a report that a foreigner participated in an anti-CECA rally that he organised last month.
It appears that Mr Goh allegedly breached the Public Order Act (POA) as the rally he conducted saw the attendance and participation of a foreigner.
Following the recent amendments to the POA in 2017, the law prohibits any foreigner taking part or observing any gathering of sort in Singapore.
More precisely, the new rule of the POA states that “[organisers] must ensure that only citizens of Singapore or permanent residents of Singapore participate in the assembly or procession”.
According to the Ministry of Law, the POA was amended in 2017 to “prevent foreigners from advancing political causes in Singapore”. The Commissioner of Police can refuse to grant a permit for public assembly organised by or involving non-Singaporean citizens.
Speaking in Parliament when the bill was passed, Minister K Shamugam said: “It has been the Government’s long-standing position that foreigners and foreign entities should not import foreign politics into Singapore; nor should they interfere in our domestic issues, especially those of a political or controversial nature.”
On 3 November, Mr Goh organised a gathering at Hong Lim Park as a platform for Singaporeans to voice their thoughts on issues regarding Singapore’s Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) and 6.9 million population plan.
This came in light of the Ramesh Erramalli incident – a foreign talent employee at J.P. Morgan who was caught on video berating security officers – which created a massive public uproar back then.
At the end of the rally, Mr Goh held a Q&A session with a panel of speakers to address any burning issues from the floor. Interestingly, the first question came from an Israeli man visiting Singapore as a tourist.
Noting that he is “very interested in politics”, he asked: “What is your first value as a nation, as a society? What is your motivation?”
However, this information was omitted by CNA in their report. The article did not state that the foreigner was just a tourist who raised the question because he was interested in politics.
Writing in the comment section of CNA’s Facebook page, netizens also questioned the news site for failing to mention this bit of detail in their article. Terence Charles Darby said, “But thanks to CNA, this report serves to produce the Streisand Effect”.


Others penned their support for Mr Goh and slammed the Government for such a rule as it’s impossible for anyone, including Mr Goh, to “stop tourist or curious people from walking into the park” and listening to the talk.
Prabu Ramachandran asked, “Is the government suggesting building a wall at Hong Lim Park speakers corner to keep foreigners out?”
Some said that Mr Goh should only be investigated if he intentionally invited non-citizens to be part of the rally.
 
Mohammad Ammar Azhar pointed out that it’s illogical for the organiser to invite foreigners to join an anti-CECA rally. He explained, “Singaporeans all against the gov allowing all foreigners like the CECA, to sideline Singaporeans for our PMET jobs. This is an act of suppression from the gov”.

Meanwhile, a bunch of netizens also asked if the police expect people to show their identification card before entering into a rally?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Human Trafficking and Exploitation in Singapore

By Tiffany Gwee In late February 2014, the Singapore Inter-Agency Taskforce on…

对假消息政府有酌处权 亚洲互联网联盟忧侵蚀言论自由

对于我国政府有意通过《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,亚洲互联网联盟(AIC)表达高度关注,同时也对于法案起草过程,公众缺乏有意义的参与和咨询机会深感失望。 亚洲互联网联盟的会员包括脸书、苹果、LINE、领英(LinkedIn)、推特、谷歌、雅虎等媒体巨头。 他们在文告中指出,支持我国政府在维护社会和谐和凝聚力、保障国家机构和政治进程完整的努力。 不过,他们对于法案起草过程中,公众缺乏有意义的参与和咨询机会表达遗憾,即便有关法案对许多利益相关者,包括媒体、科技业者、新加坡和本区域的公民社会,将带来深远影响。 ”立法不应被视为首要解决方案“ 该联盟重申,他们的立场和其他专家相同,即在应对假消息这个极度复杂的课题上,立法不应被视为优先的解决方案。 ”我们也高度关注新加坡政府获得充分酌处权,来判定消息真伪。这是迄今为止类似立法中权限最广的,过度的干预恐怕会威胁言论自由,不论对新加坡或全球各地都可能带来严重后果。“ 亚洲互联网联盟表示,愿与政府紧密配合打击错误信息,不过不愿公共辩论和思想的交流因上述法案付出代价。 至于脸书也发表声明,指出部分相关立法条文赋予新加坡政府权力,迫使公司撤下他们认定的假新闻,同时要求公司将政府的警示信息发送给用户。 根据《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,部长获得很大酌处权,判断哪些消息属假消息,并可行使权力发出指示,要求发送者或有关媒体进行更正。 如果符合这些条件,有关部门的部长,可通过三大管道制止假信息传播。 一、政府可发出针对性更正指示,比如规定假信息的内容旁,贴上正确讯息或引导读者到正确讯息的链接上。有关新闻不需撤下。…

SPP: “The people shall not be bullied any more.”

Benjamin Cheah / photos by Jean Loo Sound and fury were the…

AGO had also found shortcomings in ministries and others: Png

“Over the years, the AGO has found sad instances of over payments,…