People’s Voice founding leader Lim Tean has called out Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing to debate the merits of the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), countering the minister’s assertion that the agreement hasn’t robbed Singaporeans of jobs.
On Saturday, Mr Chan had said in an interview with Channel NewsAsia that CECA does not grant Indian nationals unconditional access into Singapore or immigration privileges. Mr Chan also said that any claim about how the agreement has cost Singaporeans’ job opportunities is merely a move to stoke fear in times of economic uncertainties.
These claims are false, asserted Mr Chan.
Mr Chan said, “Indian professionals, like any other professionals from other countries, have to meet MOM’s (Ministry of Manpower’s) existing qualifying criteria to work in Singapore. This applies to Employment Pass, S Pass, and work permit.
“Second, CECA does not give Indian nationals privileged immigration access. Anyone applying for Singapore citizenship must qualify according to our existing criteria.”
He continued, “We understand, and we share Singaporeans’ concerns with competition and job prospects in the current uncertain economic environment. But the way to help Singaporeans is not to mislead them and create fear and anger.”
However, Mr Lim Tean said in a response video posted on his Facebook page calling Mr Chan’s statements ‘ridiculous’ and said that it was an “insult” to Singaporeans who have actually lost jobs to Indian nationals.

In the video, which was recorded on the sides of People’s Voice’s Bread for All program at Kreta Ayer in Jalan  Besar GRC, Mr Lim Tean said, “Yesterday, Chan Chun Sing gave an interview to the mainstream media and said that the government took seriously the falsehoods that were being propagated online about CECA, this agreement that India and SG signed in 2005.
Now I take that as a threat by him to take action against what he deems to be alleged falsehoods. So what? He’s going to use POFMA again? Mr Chan, let me advise you. Instead of this ridiculous statement, come out openly and debunk what you consider to be false statements about CECA, false facts about CECA.”
Mr Lim Tean then pointed out that Mr Chan and Mr Heng Sweet Keat, one of the chief architects of the CECA, will have a chance to debate the matter.
Pointing to Article 9.3 of CECA, Mr Lim says the agreement provides that neither Singapore nor India “shall require labour market testing, economic needs testing, or other procedures of similar effects, as a condition of temporary entry in respect of natural persons upon whom the benefits of this chapter are conferred”.
He said, “And we all know, ladies and gentlemen, under CECA there is free movement of labour in 127 professions. Those professions include medicine, nursing, accounting.”
Mr Lim goes on to illustrate how other countries are “not so stupid as to allow the interest of their own workers and nationals to be threatened.”
Highlighting the Regional and Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RECP) conceived in 2012 between India, Australia, China, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, Mr Lim explained that Indian’s demand for free movement of professionals is the reason why the agreement has yet to be signed by all parties.
Mr Lim Tean concluded, “So ladies and gentlemen, we are going to keep asking serious questions about CECA and we need to. Because we cannot continue to have a policy, a labour policy, or we cannot continue to have immigration policies that make it easier for foreigners than the Singaporeans. Charity begins at home and it is time that we start looking after the interest of our own Singaporeans.
He then said, “People’s Voice will never allow the Singaporeans bread to be stolen. And I ask you, I ask the many thousands of Singaporeans out there who are passionate about the interest of our country, come and join us because we believe in putting people first. We believe in making Singapore our home again. And we need to regain our country, our dignity, our future.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S'pore has world's best education system but govt prefers foreign talents

The government has given notice that it would be starting a new…

Miss Universe designer is happy with his work but the public remains unconvinced

Ever since the Miss Universe Singapore costume was unveiled last week, the…

Singapore withdraws ILS, Firefly to resume flights to the Republic via Seletar Airport

Following the extension of the suspension of Singapore’s Instrument Landing System (ILS)…

政府带头试行“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式 暂无计划私人界推行

为确保自雇人士退休后能够负担医疗费用,自2020年起,将试行“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式(Contribute As You Earn)。人力部长杨莉明表示,目前由政府带头实行该计划,暂不打算在私人领域实施。 根据《海峡时报》报道,在与博纳产业总裁伊斯迈的对话环节中,杨莉明阐述,“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式,针对为政府工作的自雇人士,如自由摄影师等,政府会在支付酬劳前直接填补他们的保健储蓄户头,为自雇人士带来更多方便。 目前自雇人士的收入净额超过6000新元,仍需强制支付保健储蓄的费用。杨莉明表示,该计划使他们无须担心在“低潮期”还得应付大笔支出,同时也能提前享有保健储蓄户头每年四巴仙的利息。目前自雇人士每年只需缴交一次公积金。 “边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式于去年3月推出,旨在协助填补自雇人士的公积金保健储蓄户头。 博纳产业总裁伊斯迈也询问,自雇人士若将贡献出最高金额到保健储蓄中,是否会获得其他公积金帐户的豁免权。目前保健储蓄的缴费率从四巴仙至10.5巴仙不等,均由员工与其收入净额所定,最高可达5760新元至7560新元不等。 公积金其他账户还包括,普通账户、特殊或退休账户。目前员工除了保健储蓄账户外,仍需为其他公积金账户缴费。 对此,杨莉明表示,公积金不仅仅是为了保健需求,亦为了保障未来退休生活以及购买房子,而自雇人士就如同一般聘雇人士,他们的公积金比例分配也应于一般聘雇人士相同,贡献20巴仙到公积金账户里头。 自雇人士在这10年期间,占我国劳动者的比率介于8至10巴仙,尽管去年则维持在8巴仙,但整体人数较前年减少。而政府于2017年起,逐步落实自雇人士劳资政工作小组的建议,包括推出新保险产品补贴因生病或受伤失去的收入、制定确保自雇人士准时获得酬劳的劳资政标准等。 上述劳资政标准自去年3月推出至今,已获约570家来自各行各业的企业所采纳,在采购自雇人士提供的服务前,先在合约中明文规定服务协议。