Miss Universe Singapore 2018 showing off this year’s national costume. (Image by Alphonsus Chern / TNP)

Ever since the Miss Universe Singapore costume was unveiled last week, the public and media have not slowed down on their criticism of the costume that was inspired by the US-North Korea Summit that was held in Singapore in August this year.

The initial reaction was one of shock and dismay that the ‘national costume’ didn’t really convey any of Singapore’s multicultural heritage or icons apart from the Singapore skyline in the skirt. There was also confusion as to why the image printed on the skirt showed a moment in history for which Singapore merely provided the venue but wasn’t actually a part of otherwise.

In an interview with Channel NewsAsia, the designer of the costume Mr Moe Kasim said that he is happy with the design and has made the best of what he had, referring to budget constraints. Apparently, Mr Kasim was instructed by organisers to base his design on the Trump-Kim summit. Though he was apprehensive at first, he accepted the challenge in the spirit of promoting world peace, friendship and unity.

Mr Kasim said, “This is just a representation of what Singapore stands for, which is world peace, and the fact that Singapore is reaching out to other countries to create positive relationships.”

Miss Universe Singapore herself Zahra Khanum said that thought she was not entirely involved in coming with the design, she is happy with the dress. She said that it is “just a representation of what Singapore stands for, which is world peace”.

Some of the public’s comments about the dress have been quite pointed, ranging from comparing the construction to that of a kite, calling it dated and even comparing it to Malaysia’s previous Miss Universe national costume entry when their costume was inspired by Nasi Lemak.

There were also those who are still mystified at the ‘inspiration’ behind the dress:

Others were sympathetic to the Mr Kasim’s position, not having been given the chance to pick his own inspiration and also for the apparent budget constraints he had to work with:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“好似放烟花” 个人代步工具车道上爆炸

一段个人代步工具爆炸视频在社交媒体上疯传,引起网民关注,除了谴责超速驾驶和自行改造者之外,有者质问道“怎么陆交局还不禁个人代步工具啊”。 周末凌晨0时30分,在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff上载了一段只有43秒的视频,帖文写道,“个人代步工具爆炸地好似烟花般……给明年国庆的好主意,不用再使用太多纳税人的钱了”。 视频中只见一团火在马路旁不停地发出爆炸声,视镜放大后才发现那是一个个人代步工具,而且火势似乎越来越大,浓烟滚滚,甚至占据了其中一个车道。 马路上车辆不断,且其中一辆车子还自爆炸的个人代步工具旁经过。而在视频尾端,有一男一女的对话声音,显然两人都在犹豫着是否要向民防部通报。 有关视频上载者并没有透露任何地点或事发时间,但是依然引起网民的热议。 很多网民都揶揄道“新年快乐”、“屠妖节快乐”、“提前庆祝明年的国庆日了?”、“真是像烟花一样啊”。 也有网民表示庆幸地说,“好在是发生在空旷的马路上,没有太多车辆和行人,若发生在家中或组屋楼下就危险了”。 网友也呼吁当局尽快做出决定,下达禁止个人代步工具的禁令。 部分网民则猜测个人代步工具爆炸原因,有者认为是自行改装者的杰作,有者则认为是因为使用者超速所致。

Accurate database of domestic workers, better regulation needed: Embassies

By Terry Xu More than 70 domestic workers and some employment agencies turned up…

采矿公司多灾多难 博客分析淡马锡投资恐面对亏损

新加坡一名博客作出分析,指淡马锡基金在国际上投资的其中一家采矿公司,投资蒙古国的铜和金矿采矿项目“多灾多难”,2012年参与投资该公司的淡马锡基金很可能惨遭连累,而面对亏损。 这名博客在个人财经文章中形容,淡马锡对于采矿业投资的“豪赌”,可能面对至少10亿美元的亏损。这名博客Pat Low指的是绿松石山资源公司(Turquoise Hill Resources),这家公司在蒙古奥尤陶勒盖(Oyu Tolgoi)进行铜矿和金矿开采。 绿松石山资源公司 的主要控股股东,是跨国矿产资源巨头力拓集团(Rio Tinto Group)。根据本月14日的最新报导,力拓集团和绿松石山,他们与蒙古最大的Oyu Tolgoi铜金银矿现有的贷方合作,共同进行债务重塑。此消息也导致该公司股价跌了近23巴仙,市值跌至17.5亿美元。 绿松石山的前身,是加拿大艾芬豪矿业公司(Ivanhoe…

Workers’ Party Celebration at Hougang Ave 5

Photos taken by Chan FS, shows the crowd at Hougang Ave 5…