People’s Voice founding leader Lim Tean has called out Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing to debate the merits of the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), countering the minister’s assertion that the agreement hasn’t robbed Singaporeans of jobs.
On Saturday, Mr Chan had said in an interview with Channel NewsAsia that CECA does not grant Indian nationals unconditional access into Singapore or immigration privileges. Mr Chan also said that any claim about how the agreement has cost Singaporeans’ job opportunities is merely a move to stoke fear in times of economic uncertainties.
These claims are false, asserted Mr Chan.
Mr Chan said, “Indian professionals, like any other professionals from other countries, have to meet MOM’s (Ministry of Manpower’s) existing qualifying criteria to work in Singapore. This applies to Employment Pass, S Pass, and work permit.
“Second, CECA does not give Indian nationals privileged immigration access. Anyone applying for Singapore citizenship must qualify according to our existing criteria.”
He continued, “We understand, and we share Singaporeans’ concerns with competition and job prospects in the current uncertain economic environment. But the way to help Singaporeans is not to mislead them and create fear and anger.”
However, Mr Lim Tean said in a response video posted on his Facebook page calling Mr Chan’s statements ‘ridiculous’ and said that it was an “insult” to Singaporeans who have actually lost jobs to Indian nationals.

In the video, which was recorded on the sides of People’s Voice’s Bread for All program at Kreta Ayer in Jalan  Besar GRC, Mr Lim Tean said, “Yesterday, Chan Chun Sing gave an interview to the mainstream media and said that the government took seriously the falsehoods that were being propagated online about CECA, this agreement that India and SG signed in 2005.
Now I take that as a threat by him to take action against what he deems to be alleged falsehoods. So what? He’s going to use POFMA again? Mr Chan, let me advise you. Instead of this ridiculous statement, come out openly and debunk what you consider to be false statements about CECA, false facts about CECA.”
Mr Lim Tean then pointed out that Mr Chan and Mr Heng Sweet Keat, one of the chief architects of the CECA, will have a chance to debate the matter.
Pointing to Article 9.3 of CECA, Mr Lim says the agreement provides that neither Singapore nor India “shall require labour market testing, economic needs testing, or other procedures of similar effects, as a condition of temporary entry in respect of natural persons upon whom the benefits of this chapter are conferred”.
He said, “And we all know, ladies and gentlemen, under CECA there is free movement of labour in 127 professions. Those professions include medicine, nursing, accounting.”
Mr Lim goes on to illustrate how other countries are “not so stupid as to allow the interest of their own workers and nationals to be threatened.”
Highlighting the Regional and Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RECP) conceived in 2012 between India, Australia, China, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, Mr Lim explained that Indian’s demand for free movement of professionals is the reason why the agreement has yet to be signed by all parties.
Mr Lim Tean concluded, “So ladies and gentlemen, we are going to keep asking serious questions about CECA and we need to. Because we cannot continue to have a policy, a labour policy, or we cannot continue to have immigration policies that make it easier for foreigners than the Singaporeans. Charity begins at home and it is time that we start looking after the interest of our own Singaporeans.
He then said, “People’s Voice will never allow the Singaporeans bread to be stolen. And I ask you, I ask the many thousands of Singaporeans out there who are passionate about the interest of our country, come and join us because we believe in putting people first. We believe in making Singapore our home again. And we need to regain our country, our dignity, our future.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

以宪法挑战刑事诽谤控状被驳回 迪哥达代表律师将提刑事动议

因为一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,曾在去年12月和本社总编许渊臣一同被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),针对其指控作出宪法挑战(constitutional challenge)。 不过,今日法庭驳回了迪哥达的申请。在抗辩中,控方强调迪哥斯达因破坏内阁成员名誉,被控刑事诽谤。而哥斯达诽谤的指涉对象,是内阁成员,而不是内阁本身,而法官也赞同控方的立场。 迪哥达由律师拉维(M Ravi)代表辩护。拉维曾指出,他们“将质询,在刑事法典499条下“有关人士之声誉”,依据2017年上诉庭判例,只能诠释作为“自然人”(natural persons only”),那么,文章所指的“内阁”,就不能视为任何意义上的“个人”,也和新加坡宪法23和24条一致。” 宪法第23条阐述行政机构性质;24条则关乎内阁的组成。 迪哥达在去年12月12日,在刑事法典第499条文,以及第500条文下被提控。他被指控在2018年9月4日,电邮了含诽谤内阁成员内容的文章到《网络公民》。其中提及“高层腐败”(corruption at…

被移走猫咪一死一失踪 马林百列市镇会道歉

经常在马林台出没的两只社区猫,被马林百列市镇理事会丢弃到港湾地铁站附近小贩中心后失踪了。心急网友在脸书上悬赏寻找,却发现其中一只猫死亡,另一只仍下落不明。市镇会对此事件道歉。 爱猫人士Snowy Tan于周三(27日)在脸书上贴文,指经常出没在马林台的两只猫 Ben Ben和Leng Leng,于本月8日,被马利百列市镇会和害虫公司诱捕,之后被丢弃在离家十几里远的声音小贩中心(Seah Im Food Centre)。两只猫也无法找到回家的路。 她批评,市镇会和害虫公司,往往残酷地将猫丢到不易觅食、且车流量高的地方。“很多本地人告诉我们,有很多猫被丢到港湾,往往之后就失踪,有的可能已死掉。” 文中指出,其中一只猫Ben Ben已经被发现,在港湾一带死亡,而另一只猫Leng…

马云早前传“失踪” 首曝光与教师连线会面

阿里巴巴创始人马云,未现身公开场合已超过两个月,他的行踪也引起各界揣测。 当中国调查马云涉嫌垄断的消息传出,也引起一批投资者纷纷抛售阿里巴巴股票。不过,根据新浪财经更新信息,马云在“神隐”两个月后首度现身,透过网络连线与中国百名乡村教师对话。 阿里集团内网也发布了一篇文章《腊八节和老师们有个约定马老师来赴约了》。据报导,马云公益基金会”负责人声称,每年腊八节马云不管多忙,都会出席在海南三亚举行“马云乡村教师奖颁奖典礼”。 不过今年因疫情影响,为此首次改为线上进行;负责人称这段期间马云投入了不少精力研究教育公益。 马云在致词中也表示,希望等疫情过去了,能与教师们再见面。 马云微博在去年10月17日的最后一次更新,发布一则在2020年中国基础教育创新发展论坛上的发言。 一周后,马云在上海的一场金融论坛上称中国没有系统性金融风险,因为中国金融基本上没有系统。此番言论意味着,与通过视频致辞中国国家副主席王岐山公开唱反调。 马云当时还表示,必须改掉金融的”当铺思想”,且批评旨在降低金融风险的国际间”巴塞尔协议”是老人俱乐部,并表示”好的创新不怕监管,但是怕用昨天的方式去监管”。 此番言论引起轩然大波,从那时便再无看见马云的身影,迎接他的是一连串遭到罚款和“约谈”。 去年11月2日,中国四个金融监管部门约谈蚂蚁集团创始人马云、集团董事长井贤栋。翌日,蚂蚁集团首次公开募股(IPO)紧急叫停。 12月14日,阿里巴巴旗下的阿里巴巴投资有限公司,以及其他两家公司涉嫌违反反垄断法,处以50万元人民币罚款的行政处罚。 12月30日,阿里巴巴旗下的电商公司,天猫与其他两家公司再被罚款50万元。

Focus on Healthcare – Part 1: Claims of “universality”

Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis…