The Finance Ministry (MOF) released a report yesterday (22 Oct), reporting on the socio-economic outcomes of Singaporeans born between 1940 and 1979.
MOF said that compared to older age groups, Singaporeans in their 40s today are more educated, better able to find jobs, earn more, save more, and live longer and healthier years.
In the case of education, MOF noted that more younger generation Singaporeans now have a university degree.
“Educational attainment levels have improved across the cohorts of Singaporeans studied in the report, in line with enhanced access and improvements in the quality of the education system,” MOF said.
“Only 22% of Singaporeans born in 1940 – 1949 went beyond secondary school, compared to 79% of those born in 1970 – 1979.”
It added, “Today, students benefit from well-resourced schools and a large degree of flexibility in the education system, where they can choose from multiple pathways based on their strengths and talents.”
MOF’s data shows that 44 per cent of 4th generation Singaporeans (born in 1970 – 1979) have a degree versus 7 per cent of 1st generation (born in 1940 – 1949).

Minister Ong wants to cap university places to 40% or less for cohorts

In spite of the good progress of having more Singaporeans getting a university degree, Education Minister wants to cap the proportion of graduates in a cohort to about 30 to 40 per cent. He mentioned this 2 years ago at the 47th Saint Gallen Symposium in Switzerland.
He said education system needs to be aligned with the structure of the economy, so that people will continue to be armed with the required skills to find jobs in the current age of disruption.
In Singapore, this means capping the proportion of graduates in a cohort at about 30 to 40 per cent, while training the rest for vocations in various industries. This approach, he added, has ensured there was no glut of graduates in Singapore, and kept graduate unemployment low.
That is to say, Minister Ong will cap the number of university places to 40% or less for a cohort. But of course, many Singaporeans who couldn’t get into a local university would end up studying for external degrees, either locally or abroad.
Minister Ong feels that Singapore has an over-emphasis on academic qualifications in education.
Still, the cap of 30 to 40 per cent cap is a marked improvement from its previous alleged cap of 20 to 25 percent cap revealed in a Wikileak dump of cables from the United States.
Documented in a cable transmission from Singapore in 2007, Cheryl Chan, Assistant Director of the Planning Division at the MOE, shared that the government does not plan to encourage more students to get a higher education. The university enrollment rate will continue to be maintained at 20-25 percent because the Singaporean labor market does not need everyone to get a four-year degree, she asserted.
What Minister Ong said about the 40% cap is not new. The government increased the cap to its current target in 2012 after the People’s Action Party scored its poorest results at the General Election in 2011.
In a 2015 Today article, a graduate whose parents spent more than S$170,000 on a sports science degree in Brisbane, Australia, after he graduated with a biotechnology diploma in Singapore, was quoted, “The government shouldn’t tell people not to go to university unless they can promise the same job opportunities as graduates…But obviously that’s not going to happen.”
Meanwhile, while MOE continues to cap the number of university places in Singapore to 40% or less, the Singapore government continues to allow more foreign PMETs to enter into Singapore to work.

Note that part of the eligibility requirements for a S-Pass applicant is to have a degree or diploma, and for an Employment Pass applicant would be to “usually” have a good university degree. Jobs that could have been taken up by Singaporeans who have university degrees offered to them.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

吴作栋讽陈清木迷失方向 网民回酸:不是迷失,是看清现实

本周六(8月3日),新加坡前进党举办党推介礼,该党秘书长抨击,现今政府良好施政精神已渐乖离,三大支柱:透明、独立和问责渐被侵蚀。 荣誉国务资政吴作栋在隔日,在脸书点评陈清木,讽喻后者已“迷失方向”,如同“和风车决斗的唐吉柯德”。 此前,总理弟弟李显扬抨击今日的人民行动党已迷失方向,不再是其父亲已故李光耀领导的行动党。 陈清木指当年李光耀邀请他加入行动党。对此吴作栋声称陈清木没有提到,当年正是他把后者名字交给李光耀。“他能有今天,难道不得归功,或应该说是归咎于我吗?” 吴作栋也反讽陈清木的政党口号“为国为民”,指后者省略了“为了自己”的真实目的。 吴作栋称和陈清木是莱佛士书院的同班同学,已认识他60年了,很遗憾见到后者“迷失方向”,如同西班牙小说家塞万提斯笔下的唐吉柯德,误把风车当成巨人。 至于我国贸工部长陈振声,在周六出席丹戎巴葛集选区与拉丁马士区联合国请晚宴,也已有所值提及,具建设性政治意味着不应彼此间制造分裂,或以牺牲国家利益为代价达到个人目的。 陈振声也坚称,我国政府想来保持透明诚实,向人民说明国家面对的挑战、机遇、得失和选择,“一个负责任政府不能逃避责任,应坦率公开低于人民说明挑战,无论这类对话多困难。” 至于网民对于吴老的言论则积极发表意见,有者甚至追问:到底是谁迷失方向?有者也讽喻,陈清木或许不是迷失,而是看清事实。 有网民指究竟谁迷失方向,大可在来届选举交给选民决定;也有者质问,吴作栋应许的瑞士生活去了哪?迷失方向了?   有必要为当年“人情”拿彩?…

Public deeply unhappy with 2019 Budget, based on Yahoo Singapore Poll

On 18 February (Monday), Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat announced the 2019…

骨痛热症“袭击”波东巴西 乔立盟促司徒宇斌交代

就波东巴西遭骨痛热症肆虐,新加坡人民党主席乔立盟(Jose Raymond),要求该区国会议员司徒宇斌给个交代。 据国家环境局(NEA)官网资料显示,波东巴西及周边地区,如比达达利、信立(Sennett)和阳伯台(Youngberg Terrace)周边地区,已出现超过500个骨痛热症集点区。 乔立盟昨日(6月18日)在脸书发帖,针对当地骨痛热症疫情要求“紧急关注”,并呼吁将知会当地民众有关应采取的行动。随着在5月份骨痛热症病例持续升高,乔立盟当时就曾在脸书上分享了两次相关资讯。 他在帖文中写道,“波东巴西的骨痛热症问题亟需受到关注,并且需要知会民众有关遏止疫情传染和爆发的措施”。 他引述了司徒宇斌在《新报》上的评论,即“我们认为住宅区附近的建筑工地是肇因”、“我们需要居民的合作以保持卫生”,并指国家环境局的数据推翻了有关言论。 帖文中,乔立盟指出,据国家环境局,84巴仙的蚊虫温床在住宅区内被发现,而并非建筑工地或大集点区的公共场所。“且已确定的,病例暴增还可能是因为群众对骨痛热症第三型病毒(DENV-3)的免疫力底下,而这类型病毒案例自今年初就开始增加。” 他还补充道,“自去年底开始,第三型病毒病例持续攀升,它在我国过去30年从未大规模流行,导致免疫力低下,而传播迅速。” 我国今年至今已有1万1000起骨痛热症病例,是我国50年来最糟糕的纪录。 乔立盟也询问道,在冠状病毒19肆虐期间,是否对骨痛热症采取防疫措施。“虽然在上个月(5月)的议会中,有回应了关于冠毒疫情期间的骨痛热症防疫课题,但是我们仍然面对速度惊人的骨痛热症传播率,尤其是在波东巴西一带,因此希望能够获得当局采取紧急行动,以及明确的防疫措施。”

"Totally irresponsible" to support IS, says Yaacob Ibrahim

  The Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs, Yaacob Ibrahim, says it is “totally…