At the National Day Rally yesterday (18 Aug), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that Singapore’s current annual spending of about $1 billion on early childhood education will “more than double” over the next few years, as the Government looks to make pre-schools more affordable.
He wants to increase the number of government-supported pre-schools to 80 per cent over time.
He told the audience that pre-schools should be like “housing and healthcare” where there are good and affordable government-funded options for all Singaporeans.
“For pre-school, we should have good quality, government-supported choices available to all Singaporeans,” he said. Pre-school subsidies will also be enhanced, announced PM Lee.
At the moment, families are only eligible for additional means-tested subsidies if their monthly household incomes do not exceed $7,500. To offer more help to those from the middle-income, this income ceiling will be raised to $12,000 per month, he said.
Apart from ensuring affordability, other efforts include the doubling of full-day pre-school capacity to almost 180,000 places since 2012. The number of kindergartens run by the Ministry of Education (MOE) – currently at 24 – will more than double in the next few years, he said.
PAP and NTUC-run pre-schools dominate market
Despite the increase in the number of kindergartens run by MOE in the next few years, PM Lee neglected to mention that the pre-school market is currently dominated by his party, the PAP, with NTUC coming up second.
PAP operates PCF Sparkletots through a charitable organisation founded by PAP, called PAP Community Foundation (PCF). On its website, it said it is “committed to nurturing a multi-racial, fair, just and inclusive society by providing educational, welfare and community services”.
PCF Sparkletots is currently the largest pre-school operator in Singapore where it has 360 outlets. Next come, My First Skool operated by NTUC First Campus under the NTUC labour movement, with 136 outlets. There is a total of 1517 childcare centres as of April 2019.
Both of the two operators are pre-school anchor operators listed by the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) where the schools get funding support from the government.
Even though PCF is a charitable organization, with more PAP pre-schools being established thanks to the “more than double” spending by the government, it would certainly help to establish the “PAP” brand in the minds of Singaporean kids. This may give an unfair “marketing” advantage to PAP over oppositions.
After the rally, opposition member Dr Paul Tambyah said that while kindergartens by the MOE are a “step in the right direction”, his party, the Singapore Democratic Party, proposes that early childhood education be nationalized, similar to primary and secondary schools now.
In other words, pre-schools, like our primary and secondary schools, should remain neutral and apolitical.
MOE rejects nationalisation of pre-school
Back in 2017, Nominated Member of Parliament, Kuik Shiao-Yin asked the Minister for Education on what are the considerations for keeping pre-school education privatised rather than nationalised as an extension of the current nationalised education system and what are the continual barriers or current issues that impede nationalisation of pre-school education.
In response, then-Minister for Education (Schools), Ng Chee Meng said that a key benefit of the market-based approach is that it provides parents with a diverse range of programmes to choose from, so as to best cater to their preferences and the different needs of their young children.
While a nationalised system has the potential to provide more consistent quality and affordability, he said that this system may not cater to the preferences of every parent.
He noted that it is recognised that the private sector and the community have built expertise over the years, and we value them as partners in our endeavour to ensure a strong start for every child.
“Hence, our priority now is to work together to raise the accessibility, affordability and quality of pre-school.” said Mr Ng.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Take care of residents, depoliticise town councils: NSP to government

The National Solidarity Party (NSP) has called on the government not to…

敦马说新马间需建更多桥 吴作栋释善意赞同

“马哈迪建议新马间建更多桥梁,它们的成本效益值得探讨。与此同时,让我们在领袖间、议员和两国人民间建立更多政治上、友好的桥梁。” 针对马国首相敦马早前献议,要舒缓新加坡和马来西亚之间的交通堵塞问题,两国需至少建三到四座桥梁。对此,荣誉国务资政吴作栋释放善意,表示乐见新马间有更紧密的联系。 吴作栋昨晚在脸书发文,提到打自新马分家以来,两国人民的关系似乎渐行渐远,新马后代对彼此也将感到越发陌生。 “我更倾向两国间能发展在物质上和政治上的更亲密和稳健联系。我们是邻居,永远都是。” 根据本月19日马新社报导,马哈迪在出席新加坡一个投资论坛时,在问答环节针对新马交通问题作回应,认为要舒缓新马间的交通堵塞问题,需增建“至少三到四座桥梁”。 他比喻,即便连交通问题远不如马新交通般严重的槟城,目前也已在探讨兴建一条新的海底隧道,来连接马来半岛。 他说,目前新马间的交通联系仅依靠一座长提和一座桥,未来应增减至少三到四座桥。但与此同时,他又表示对于新加坡不愿建更多桥感到不解。 此外,他也否定了该国会因为水供问题开战的可能性,因为“我们都是好人,我们尝试像文明人一样展开谈判。” 狮城网民:应先改善现有关卡服务 新马间因水供协议等课题近几个月来交锋不断,吴作栋此举似乎释放善意。不过,一些网民针对敦马建更多桥的建议,在本地英语媒体脸书留言,认为应先解决关卡的服务问题,不然10个柜台只有两人驻守,旅客通关还是一样缓慢。 不过,也有者认为,比起造价高昂的隆新高铁,建更多桥梁反而能让更多普通群众受惠。 有者也提出雷人建议,认为干脆把土地都填了,和马国边界接壤,就没有要不要建桥的问题。…

Dengue cases dropped to 84 cases with 13 clusters of high risk

Dengue cases dropped as only 84 cases were diagnosed between 23 and…

要小贩营业超过12小时? 读者批社企“现代奴隶制”

从2015年开始,国内至少有七座小贩中心,以社会企业模式经营。 本地有114做小贩中心,在2027年前,还会增减13座小贩中心。不过根据卫生部兼环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,日前在拜访淡滨尼综合站小贩中心时,曾对媒体表示,未来是否会继续沿用社企模式,还有待评估。 早前有小贩反映,他们在这些社企经营的摊位,被征收附加费用,例如高达1千200元的中央清洗碗盘费。而一般社企小贩中心,管理层所征收的中央洗碗盘费用,约介于600-800元。 淡滨尼综合站小贩中心,也被誉为首个24小时营业的小贩中心。 事实上,就有读者在两年前,在咖啡店集团旗下子公司OTMH,于2016年11月正式接管淡滨尼小贩中心前,致函本社申诉,有关社企管理层对小贩们的要求,形同要落实“现代版的奴隶制”。 当时,有关读者有意申请该小贩中心摊位,于是联系社企OTMH公司,被告知业者需至少营业12个小时,最长24小时。 鼓励小贩经营超过12小时 这意味着,要实施现代咖啡店24小时不打烊概念,管理层可以要求摊主们拉长经营时间,也更倾向于把摊位租给愿意长时间工作的小贩,最好是能24小时、每周七天都营业。 读者认为,小贩和其他辛勤工作的新加坡人一样,也需要休息和休假,他们也要陪家人子女。压榨小贩们的劳动和时间,剥夺他们应有的休息,藉此最大化小贩中心的盈利。 该读者也质疑,为何审核小贩申请资格的不再是环境局,而全权交给有关社企公司。 他认为,完全由该公司自行决定而不是公开招标,有欠公平。这是因为小贩中心是用公款建设,政府才是拥有者,社会企业只是管理小贩中心的代理人。 “为何他们(指社企)可以被赋予如此多自由,在不公布遴选过程的情况下,来自行选择小贩?”…