At the National Day Rally 2019 yesterday (18 Aug), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong took the opportunity to lash out at fake news circulating on social media, saying that government would be changing withdrawal policies of the Central Provident Funds or CPF withdrawal ages.
In the script published on PMO’s website, PM Lee said, “Let me add one last point here, to be absolutely clear: we are not making any changes to CPF withdrawal policies or CPF withdrawal ages. You can still take out some money at age 55. And you can still start your CPF payouts from age 65.”
“All that remains exactly the same. So please ignore any rumours you may hear about this, or messages on WhatsApp, because they are fake news!”
On national TV yesterday, however, he added the following warning, “Please delete it and tell your friends. Don’t share it with more friends and confuse people because that would be fake news.”
“POFMA would catch you!” he added.
The members of audience were seen clapping.
CPF Minimum Sum keeps changing
While CPF withdrawal ages are not changing, PM Lee, however, neglected to say in the rally that the CPF Minimum Sum continues to increase year after year.
The Minimum Sum (or Full Retirement Sum) is the mandatory amount of retirement savings which one has to set aside in his or her Retirement Account for the CPF LIFE annuity scheme. After setting this amount aside, the CPF member can then withdraw any money left (in Ordinary Account) at 55.
The member can opt for half of Minimum Sum (or Basic Retirement Sum) to be set aside if he or she has a house to pledge but the member would be receiving less annuity payouts at 65.
As can be seen on CPF website, the Minimum Sum has been increasing year after year:

Note that the new Minimum Sum has not been announced for those who turn 55 after 2020 but based on the above table, one can see that it would likely be even more than the amount in 2020.
In fact, from the above table, the average increase in Minimum Sum per year is about $6,300. So, at this rate, by 2040, the Minimum Sum would calculate to be $307,000!
It was revealed by Minister of Manpower, Josephine Teo last year in Parliament that only 53% in the 2016 cohort of those in 55 years old, met their minimum sums, leaving 47% unable to do so.
As the Minimum Sum increases, more of those in the future generations of Singaporeans would likely not be able to withdraw their CPF funds at 55. Hence, it doesn’t matter if the withdrawal age of 55 is changed or not.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

牵涉9.27事件的四人更换代表律师

有关9月27日,“还我公积金”事件诉讼案件最新进展汇报如下。 刘慧珠, 许友明, 蔡秀玲和吴义发, 四人在2014年12月与韩慧慧和鄞义林分开由不同律师代为抗辩。 他们的律师在2015年1月份较早时间向法院提交了代表信件给予总检察署但总检察署拒绝了他们的代表信。 据说,代表律师要求他们认罪, 并说这是他最好的劝告并支付一笔小额数的罚款。 他们的律师说,基督教青年會(YMCA)有70名证人可以上庭与他们进行对质。 他们的代表律师说假设他们不认罪,他将申请放弃成为他们的辩护律师。 刘慧珠说他们不可能认罪,所以要求律师提出要求与对方的70位证人对质。因此,在星期五的行审前会议中,他们的律师放弃当他们的代表。 拉维律师已经能够正式接手这四人的案件并着拍手进行辩护。案件也将在2015年6月开庭。…

“Unrealistic” and “wishful” for MINDEF to expect zero fatalities in NS: Pritam Singh

It is “unrealistic” and “wishful” for the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) to…

吴作栋讽陈清木迷失方向 网民回酸:不是迷失,是看清现实

本周六(8月3日),新加坡前进党举办党推介礼,该党秘书长抨击,现今政府良好施政精神已渐乖离,三大支柱:透明、独立和问责渐被侵蚀。 荣誉国务资政吴作栋在隔日,在脸书点评陈清木,讽喻后者已“迷失方向”,如同“和风车决斗的唐吉柯德”。 此前,总理弟弟李显扬抨击今日的人民行动党已迷失方向,不再是其父亲已故李光耀领导的行动党。 陈清木指当年李光耀邀请他加入行动党。对此吴作栋声称陈清木没有提到,当年正是他把后者名字交给李光耀。“他能有今天,难道不得归功,或应该说是归咎于我吗?” 吴作栋也反讽陈清木的政党口号“为国为民”,指后者省略了“为了自己”的真实目的。 吴作栋称和陈清木是莱佛士书院的同班同学,已认识他60年了,很遗憾见到后者“迷失方向”,如同西班牙小说家塞万提斯笔下的唐吉柯德,误把风车当成巨人。 至于我国贸工部长陈振声,在周六出席丹戎巴葛集选区与拉丁马士区联合国请晚宴,也已有所值提及,具建设性政治意味着不应彼此间制造分裂,或以牺牲国家利益为代价达到个人目的。 陈振声也坚称,我国政府想来保持透明诚实,向人民说明国家面对的挑战、机遇、得失和选择,“一个负责任政府不能逃避责任,应坦率公开低于人民说明挑战,无论这类对话多困难。” 至于网民对于吴老的言论则积极发表意见,有者甚至追问:到底是谁迷失方向?有者也讽喻,陈清木或许不是迷失,而是看清事实。 有网民指究竟谁迷失方向,大可在来届选举交给选民决定;也有者质问,吴作栋应许的瑞士生活去了哪?迷失方向了?   有必要为当年“人情”拿彩?…