Hidden among the many written replies to Parliamentary questions posed last week (10 Jul) was one answered by new Manpower Minister Josephine Teo.

In her written reply she started out saying that some 42% of CPF members decide not to withdraw their CPF monies, even when their monies are above the statutory minimum sum.

Ms Teo said, “As of end 2017, 42% of those who turned age 55 in 2016 did not withdraw any CPF monies within a year of their 55th birthday.”

“This includes the first $5,000 from the Ordinary and Special Accounts (OA and SA) which members can withdraw unconditionally, monies above their cohort Full Retirement Sum, as well as monies above Basic Retirement Sum which can be withdrawn using property charge or pledge,” she added.

But she also revealed that about 60% of the 58% who did withdraw, took up to $5,000 out of their CPF.

Ms Teo continued, “For the same (2016) cohort, about 53% of active members met their Full Retirement Sum in cash and pledge at age 55 in 2016.”

“Of this group, about 5 in 10 left additional funds in their CPF Ordinary or Special Accounts. Based on our observations, members do so because they have no immediate need of the money, or they wish to take advantage of the higher CPF risk-free interest rates,” she said.

In other words, for the cohort at age 55 in 2016, only 53% meet their minimum sums, leaving 47% unable to do so.

13,500 take out CPF monies and leave Singapore every year

And from 2013 to 2017, an annual average of 13,500 CPF members, or 0.4% of total CPF members, withdrew their CPF monies when they left Singapore.

“This includes former Singapore Citizens (SC), former Permanent Residents (PR) and foreigners who contributed to the CPF before 2003,” she said.

But she noted that former SC and PR members can still leave their monies in the CPF after they have given up their Singapore citizenship or permanent residency.

“CPFB does not track the number of former SC and PR members who choose to retain their monies in the CPF,” she added.

She did not breakdown the proportion of SC and PR leaving Singapore but presumably, majority of the 13,500 who took out their CPF monies and left Singapore each year for good would be Malaysians who were formerly Singapore PRs.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

50 year-old man arrested for appearing naked near the States Court

A 50-year-old man was arrested for appearing nude in public, along Upper…

No longer content to murmur our dissent

Ghui / GE 2011 was not just an election that politicised an…

近百患者与武吉班让综合交通中心感染群有关! 淡马亚吁民众勿惊惶

日前《海峡时报》报导指出,近100名冠病确诊者,与武吉班让综合交通中心感染群有关联! 消息震惊人民,不过传染病学亚太学会会长淡马亚教授安抚民心,敦促人民勿惊惶,提醒我国的检测和专业都属全球顶级,过去也曾确认接触者,迅速阻断传播链。 上月中旬,武吉班让综合交通中心出现感染群,其中包括巴士车长和巴士转换站职员,在确诊后,为确保能够及时控制感染群,本地约1万1千名公共交通业员工均接受冠病检测。 当局在7月23日至8月5日之间于七个地点展开拭子检测,包括两个巴士车厂和两处住所。 截至目前,已逾3700名公交员工和承包商当中,有六人的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)冠病检测呈阳性,卫生部已分别在7月24日、30日和8月6日公布这六起病例。这六人的血清检测也呈阳性,相信他们是在早前受感染。 另有89人的血清检测呈阳性,但PCR检测呈阴性,这意味着他们曾经染病并已康复,不会再传播病毒。这89人当中,有12人之前住在宿舍,惟当局未透露他们的工作岗位。 淡马亚表示,新加坡公共卫生当局在使用血清检测的经验和专业都属于世界顶级,曾在三月初,透过血清检测出第83例和91例,并快速地将两个无关联的感染群连在一起,才能迅速断开传播链。 “我们敦促居民勿惊惶。新加坡公共卫生当局也正利用血清检测确定接触者,而且我国一直在这方面都是领先于其他国家。” 因此,针对武吉班让的情况,相信透过血清检测获得类似的结果。 他也呼吁民众应该时刻留意自己的身体状况,并保持良好的卫生习惯,一旦出现急性呼吸系统症状,或突然发烧或失去味觉或嗅觉,应立即前往公共卫生防范诊所(PHPC)就医,接受检测,并告知医生曾到访的地点。 此外,他也要求新加坡政府应该公开其测试结果,并在防范策略上保持透明,让公众理解,以遏制病毒的传播。 “我们相信,新加坡人民定能够在这一战中取得成功。”

司徒国辉赞毕丹星 “当好政治家不需百万薪酬”

本地食评家司徒国辉这次不谈美食,赞扬刚刚获委国会反对党领袖的毕丹星,获得加薪后就立即宣布把薪酬的一半回馈社群。 “他很清楚要当好政治家,不需要有百万元(薪酬),有些人还嘲讽他在作秀,似乎政治人物做好事或计划就该静静不说。” 毕丹星前日表示要把附加的国会反对党领袖薪酬的一半,用在工人党选区扶助低收入居民和其他慈善用途。这相当于9万6000元。 与此同时,司徒国辉也赞许另一位社运份子吴家和,他刚在本届选举参选败选,但很快就恢复了多年来一直持续的社区工作,探访流离失所和孤苦伶仃的民众。 他收集来自志愿者和支持者的食物和资源,挨家逐户拜访,交给有需要的人士。 司徒国辉表示,自己也曾跟随吴家和一起去探访民情,不过走了四五个楼层就投降了,但是吴家和还能每周坚持下去。而他自己则只是略尽绵力,捐些款项和收集来自露天熟食中心Makansutra Gluttons Bay小贩的热食,供弱势群体食用。 吴家和和其他人民之声团队在白沙-榜鹅集选区对垒张志贤领军的团队,惟仅得票12.18巴仙,失按柜金。迄今吴家和还在筹募按柜金的款项。