Last month, Chili’s Singapore announced the closure of its restaurant chain. Chili’s Singapore was run by Belgarath Investments through GDA Restaurants, which was Chili’s franchisee. It had 3 stores in Singapore at Tanglin Mall, Resorts World Sentosa and Clarke Quay Central mall.

Mr Greg Blakney, managing director of Belgarath Investments, blamed the new foreign-worker quota announced by the government in Feb as one of the reasons for closing its operations. He said that the foreign-worker quota for the services sector is set to drop in the next two years and this will make it “considerably difficult” for restaurant operators.

The F&B sector’s Dependency Ratio Ceiling — which stipulates the proportion of foreign workers that firms may hire — will be marginally cut from 40 per cent to 38 per cent on Jan 1 next year, and to 35 per cent on Jan 1, 2021.

Mr Blakney who is a Canadian, also mentioned that “escalating labour expense, difficulty in hiring and training people, exceptionally high leasing expense, and the general expansion of shopping malls in Singapore have fractured the market”, leading to the closure.

He added that it was expensive to train employees and those who learnt the ropes would leave after several months, as restaurants compete for qualified workers. “There are so many people looking for qualified restaurant employees and people trained at Chili’s were valuable in the market,” he said.

The problem was made worse because few Singaporeans are willing to take up such jobs. “The fact that machines cannot replace people in restaurants means the coming quota issues are going to make things considerably difficult for operators, except the small, mobile ones,” he said.

Despite raising wages for most workers by 30 to 50 per cent in the past five years, Mr Blakney said that his firm still could not get people to work in the industry. “Restaurants need to be staffed with people and there is no way around the need of them,” he said. “The market is completely unsustainable.”

MOM: Belgarath Investments’ utilisation of foreign workers “higher than average”

In response, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) told the media that the new foreign-worker quota will not affect most firms as their pool of foreign workers is below the quota.

However, with regard to Belgarath Investments, MOM noted that its utilisation of foreign workers was “higher than average” among food-and-beverage (F&B) companies.

“The average and median wages for its local employees are also lower than their industry benchmarks,” the ministry added. In other words, Belgarath Investments was not willing to pay more to get local workers.

“For those that are affected, the Government will continue to help them access the local manpower pool and to operate in more manpower-lean ways,” the ministry said.

The reliance on foreign workers cannot continue indefinitely, NUS Assoc Prof Lawrence Loh said. While firms may reduce costs and consumers pay lower prices, there is a broader social cost involved. “Having low-value-added foreign workers strains the tight social infrastructure in resource-scarce Singapore,” he said.

A quick online check does indicate that Belgarath Investments might be hiring foreign workers “higher than average”:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Minister for Law: Article 35(4) does not create an age issue for the appointment of a 63-yr-old Attorney General

Minister for Law Mr K Shanmugam on behalf of the Prime Minister…

兀兰警署水龙头被偷 网民酸水龙头怎么那么贵?

日前,一名男子前往兀兰警署总部保释亲人时,趁机将警署内,价值171.20新元的水龙头偷走。警方经一个月的调查和调阅闭路电视,发现男子并正式逮捕他,昨日(15日)被控上法庭,判处3个月监禁。 偷窃案件曝光后,引发网民关注,许多网民质疑,警方是调阅闭路电视才揪出男子,是否意味着即便在厕所也遭到监控,令他们感到疑惑和不安。 对此,《亚洲新闻台》向总检察署查证,有关警署厕所内装监视器是否属实,而总检察署的回应指,监视器并非装载厕所内,而是厕所门口。 “监视器面向男厕的门口。其犯罪行为会被发现,是因为刚好拍摄到他从门口走出去。”故此,我们至少知道,当局不至于以监视器窥探个人隐私。 另一网民关注的重点是,为何一个警署内的水龙头需用到价值171.20新元? 事实上,兀兰警署是去年11月25日才开始运营。根据警方此前声明,兀兰警署作为新的地区总部,需要“为新加坡人民的需求提供更好的服务”,由陈亮华担任署长。 然而,水龙头一般价格落在什么价位?本社英文站前往查看,与民众最常购买家具的宜家家居进行比对,发现兀兰警署内所使用的水龙头价格,比大多数在宜家网页售卖的水龙头都贵,除了最贵的一款售价175元。 偷窃案报导曝光后,引来网友许多关注,网友都将焦点放在水龙头的价格和厕所内是否装有监视器。部分网友质疑为何警署需要用到这么贵的水龙头: 网友Ray Howe:真的吗?既然水龙头价格这么贵,那一定有他特别的地方 网友Richardson Lau:…

王乙康:“两次犯错才开除” 不应成为标准处理方式

针对近几日闹得沸沸扬扬的国大偷拍风波,我国教育部长在昨晚首次针对此事发文,强队对于危机校园学生的犯罪行为,都应采取强硬立场,向所有人发出强烈的讯息。 他在脸书贴文中表示,已先后向国大校长和国大董事部主席,表达对此事件的关注,同时也向他们指出,国大对涉及此事件的男生所采取的处分“明显不足”。 他认为“两次犯错才开除”,不应成为标准处理方式。“国大应该确保所有学生在校园内的安全,特别是女学生。” 他表示,国大将立即检讨该校的纪律和惩处框架,“我有信心国大检讨后能带来更严谨的纪律框架,国大董事会和校长正在处理这件事,他们有决心要停止校园内这类不可接受的行为。” 国大是在较早前受询时说,违规学生若重犯,将会被该校开除。“由于我们是教育机构,希望给学生机会,所以初犯者在纪律委员会上可能面对不同的处分,但不会直接被开除。” 23岁的受害者,国大女学生马芸(Monica Baey)早前Instagram公布她曾于去年11月,在校园宿舍洗澡时,遭到一名24岁男同学偷拍的经历。她表示,警方已经给予男生12个月的严厉警告,国立大学也要求男生写道歉信,并且停课一学期,禁止他进入大学大厅和宿舍,更为他提供辅导。 她在帖子中提到,她希望“犯下这种行为的肇事者接受真正的后果”,她认为男生受到的惩处太轻了。    

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Muhyiddin receives first jab of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin on Wednesday (24 Feb) received the first…