The Ministry of Finance (MOF) has said that the reason why ST Marine is still allowed to procure government contracts even after seven of its senior executives were found guilty of corruption in one of the biggest graft scandals in Singapore is because the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) did not find any offences related to government contracts or agencies.

They claim that since ST Marine’s corrupt practices didn’t involve government contracts and didn’t cause harm or irreparable damage to government agencies, then they’re allowed to continue bidding on contracts put out by the government, they’re allowed to continue using the government’s procurement portal, GeBiz. This is according to the guidelines set out by the Standing Committee on Disbarment (SCOD).

However, if you look at the Defence Procurement guidelines on the Defence Science & Technology Agency (DSTA) website it states that any company found guilty of corruption will be barred from obtaining any new contracts or tenders from the government. The DSTA guidelines do not make a distinction between government and non-government contracts. And since GeBiz is also under the purview of DSTA, you would think that the DSTA guidelines would supersede the SCOD ones. Apparently not.

The contract that was awarded to ST Marine is valued at about S$316 million for the construction of 12 aluminium hulled patrol boats for the Police Coast Guard (PCG). The tender included the option to supply and the maintenance of these boats for a firm period of 15 years and the option to extend for another three years.

MHA awarding the S$316 million contract to ST Marine is also surprising because the corruption scandal was massive. Back in 2017, seven of the company’s former senior executives were convicted of corruption for covering up and accepting bribes up to at least $24.9 million between 2000 and 2011. It’s no small thing.

Back in 2018, a question was asked in Parliament about whether contractors with a record of safety lapses who have been blacklisted by the Ministry of Manpower for those lapses can be made ineligible to tender for public infrastructure projects for a longer period of time to ensure that all contractors take building quality and safety seriously.

The Minister for Transport, Khaw Boon Wan responded that the SCOD decides on all cases of debarment of contracts, adding that contractors may be debarred on safety grounds and that the period of debarment depends on the severity of each case. This, he said, is a debarment framework that all government agencies follow.

The Minister did not, however, distinguish between contractors with safety lapses on public or private project. It was clear that any contractor with safety lapses, whether on private or public projects, that have been blacklisted by MOM, is at risk of debarment. The framework applied to all.

Now let’s a look individuals ex-offenders. In 2018, a Potong Pasir resident’s application for a license to be a security officer was reject by the Singapore Police Force (SPF). In their rejection letter to the man who is an ex-convict, SPF stated that he was ‘not a fit person’ in lieu of his previous conviction.

Jose Raymond, at the time, asked ‘what happened to giving people second changes and opportunities to make amends and move on after making mistakes?’

In response to Mr Jose Raymond’s concern, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Home Affairs said in 2018 that someone with a criminal record has to remain offence-free for a certain amount of time before they can take up certain jobs. This duration of the required offence-free period varies according to the severity and relevance of their conviction.

Mountbatten MP Lim Biow Chuan at the time also said that most people would ‘err on the side of caution’ when they consider hiring an ex-convict.

So comparing these two case with ST Marine, there appears to be an inconsistency. When it comes to civilians found guilty of committing offences, they’re barred from being employed. And according to the Parliamentary reply from Minister Khaw, contractors are at risk of debarment regardless of whether their lapses involved public or private projects.

So why is there a different standard when it comes to ST Marine’s participation in the government’s procurement portal, GeBiz? Why is there a distinction made between corruption within the private and public sector?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

辅警头部中枪 倒毙在停车场疑自轰

42岁辅警下班后不见人,配枪亦未归还,警方出动四处寻人,却在五小时后发现他头部中枪,疑自轰身亡,倒在东海岸公园停车场的大树下。 《联合晚报》透露,警方已证实此事,指在昨日凌晨一点33分左右接获策安辅助警察部队(Certis CISCO)的通报,一名42岁男辅警于下班后未归还手枪。 于是警方紧急出动寻人,在近五小时后的寻人后,于19日清晨6点16分左右的东海岸公园的C2停车场找到男辅警的遗体。当时已头部中枪,而起配枪也在身旁,救护人员赶到后,也证实辅警已身亡。 策安辅助警察部队指挥官池镇华在回复《联合晚报》记者询问,目前已联系上他的家属,并会给予扶持和帮助,而公司正在协助警方的调查工作。

Ng Chee Meng: F&B sold in school canteens must comply with HPB guidelines

Minister for Education (Schools) Ng Chee Meng had earlier stated in Parliament…

MARUAH expresses concern about cancellation of approvals for Speakers’ Corner event

Local Non-government Organisation, MARUAH expresses their concern over the cancellation of approvals…

Two dead as police open fire amid raging India protests

by Bhuvan Bagga, Jalees Andrabi with Vishal Manve in Mumbai Police opened…