A 54-year-old veteran named Khris Ang recently took his Facebook page to vent his dissatisfaction over Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board after it had been changing the retirement payout age multiple times over the years.

In his post, the former senior engineer said that when he started working, he had no option but to put in his monthly contribution into his CPF account. However, he mentioned that it’s a bad habit that CPF Board has acquired as it keep deferring the payouts.

He revealed that when he first started working, the deal was everyone can get a complete withdrawal when they reach the age of 55. This according to Ang is “an absolute peach sweet and juicy” deal for CPF Board.

“Even the worst local bank would offer me more than 2.5% for a crappy structural deposit on a 10 year term, capital guaranteed. If I use them, I would be able to do an early withdrawal of my funds before maturity, albeit with a penalty charge. You could certainly do better than 2.5% for a complete lock in for no withdrawal option for 3 decades,” he wrote.

He went on further to express his disappointment when CPF Board thought it had the right to dictate his retirement age and how he should live his life.

“We agreed on a complete withdrawal at 55 years old at the beginning of our contract. You revised it, because you told me you cared for me. So you suggested 60, then 63 and you urged me to stretch my non-withdrawal to 65 years old, by giving me a bonus of $1,200 for a 2 year extension. That would amount to a total of more than 40 years of keeping my money with you. Oh, is that how things work around here? I would have offered you $12,000, to withdraw my money 20 years earlier. I would if I could, if you HAVE THE MONEY to return me in the first place,” he vented.

“And eventually, it became 65 unknowingly, now again, you cunningly postponed it to 70 and do whatever mean to stretch it to 93,” he added.

Recently, there were rumour circulating that the Government had quietly shifted the CPF Retirement Payout age from 65 to 70. However, this has been said to be false and the payout eligibility age for the Retirement Sum Scheme is indeed 65 for those born from 1965, and this had not changed since it was announced in 2007. However, the default age if one does not submit one’s application for withdrawal, has become 70 years old since Jan 2018.

Feeling extremely unhappy, Ang asked, “Over the last 20 years, you have dropped too many hints to suggest things are not the way you thought to be, so when can get it right then?”

He ended his post by saying that if things continue to change constantly like now, he can’t imagine what the changes will be like a decade from now, when he reaches 64 years old.

Upon reading his post, netizens also agree that CPF Board is not doing the right thing by deferring the payout constantly.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】曾有确诊者到过义安城高岛屋、滨海湾金沙等十地点

据卫生部文告,曾有确诊者在本月21日至28日之间,到过多座商场、餐馆、小贩中心等10个地点。 当局呼吁若有民众曾在下述时段,和确诊者到访同一地点,宜留意自己的健康情况,如有不适,应立即就医。 公众也可到gov.sg查询,通过合力追踪或电子政府密码应用程序中的Safe Entry选项,查看自己是否到过这些地点。 这些地点包括: 12月21日晚上7时至8时30分:英国俱乐部(The British Club)的Windsor Arms餐厅 12月22日早上10时45分至11时30分:丹戎巴葛中心一家眼镜店Vision Lab Eyewear…

Marital rape an ’emotive topic’ – MCYS

The following is an excerpt from No To Rape’s blog In October…

鄞义林:比较台湾和新加坡的公共医疗服务

鄞义林撰文,北雁译 在亚洲新闻台看到一篇文章,提到名为Serynn Guay的34岁女青年,她其中一项烦恼,是“无法预测”的医疗开销。 她说,“我们不知道当我们年纪大些时,究竟需要多少才够用… 我们能安稳地退休吗?我们的积蓄是否足够?” 她补充,“有可能接下来20年都要继续工作,即使孩子已经大学毕业,我们还要继续为储蓄退休和其他生活开销打拼。” 这里让我和大家分享台湾的情况。 在台湾,医疗保健是免费的,在现有的国家保健和退休计划下,一个从现在起工作40年的人,大约能以现有薪资的60巴仙养老。 所以,台湾人不会感受到新加坡人一样的忧虑。他们知道只要身体不适,都能接受有素质的医疗服务,无需感到恐惧,或担心负担不起而不敢去看医生。 他们也知道,到了退休年龄就真的可以退休,他们也很向往退休生活。 但是在我国,国人缴税、也支付保健储蓄和终身健保,但是还是很怕看医生。 在台湾,员工只需为医疗保险支付薪资的一巴仙,就能享有免费医疗保健。但是在新加坡,我们把薪资的8-10.5巴仙都放入保健储蓄,也不能享有完全免费的医保。而且,还要自掏腰包负担最昂贵的医疗服务。…

"Rain" within Raffles Place station due to fire sprinklers accidentally triggered

Videos of “rain” happening within Raffles Places station on Wednesday (19 April)…