Netizens are furious at Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) for showing no sympathy to the man who was bitten by a snake while he was trying to capture the reptile at Tang Place.

On Tuesday night (29 January), AVA said that it was investigating the alleged mishandling of a snake after photos and videos of the python lurking outside the building along busy Orchard Road were circulated on social media earlier that day.

A video was uploaded by user Rabbikhan Khan, showed four men trying to capture the python.

In the two-minute video, the python was seen biting the hand of one of the men, which seems gloved. The man, who was wearing a shirt with the word “Anticimex” written on it, later stepped on the reptile as it struggled.

In another footage uploaded by Facebook user Tess Fernando, the python, which seems to be around 3m long, was originally seen partially coiled up behind a recycling bin.

AVA said the python was removed and handed to Wildlife Reserves Singapore.

However, there were no news reported on the condition of the man who bitten by the snake.

“Cruelty to animals is an offence under the Animals and Birds Act. AVA has issued a set of guidelines on the proper handling of snakes to all pest control and wildlife management agencies in Singapore,” the authority said.

“For example, snakes should not be unduly harmed by the persons handling it and appropriate equipment should be used to catch them.

“AVA investigates all feedback relating to animal cruelty and will not hesitate to take enforcement action against offenders,” it added.

However, netizens don’t really agree with AVA’s action of investigating this case for alleged mishandling of the snake as the man stepped on the reptile in an attempt to protect himself.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Detonation of war relic along Woodlands Road 

A war relic found at a construction site along Woodlands Road was detonated by…

AGC drops criminal charge against lawyer M Ravi for defaming Law Minister K Shanmugam; issues conditional warning

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has discontinued a criminal charge against human rights…

“不抬举总检察署所作所为” 李绳武宣布退出藐视法庭诉讼程序

李显扬之子、也是哈佛经济教授的李绳武,今日(22日)在脸书分享近况,他透露不会再继续参与,总检察署起诉他藐视法庭的诉讼程序。 总检察署近期申请撤销李绳武的辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分,“使之在审讯时不会被纳入考量”。 他也指责总检察署要求上述部分在法庭记录中封存,使之民众不知道被移除的内容是什么。 “这不是单一事件,而是总检察署广泛异常行为的一部分。例如,在上诉庭辩论司法管辖权时,新设立的法庭条例,可以用以回溯追究我。法庭曾认为新条例具追溯力是不公平的。” 把李鸿毅从脸书朋友名单中移除 他表示,自己不会再继续参与总检察署针对他的诉讼程序,“我不会参与去抬举总检察署的所作所为。”( I will not dignify the AGC’s…