Singapore ministry of education plaque from Shutterstock.com

Following a viral outburst on social media by adjunct teacher Lenny Rahman that led to her leaving her post, the Ministry of Education (MOE) said that educators should be mindful of their behaviour on social media platforms.

Responding to queries from Straits Times, MOE divisional director of HR solutions and capabilities said, “MOE has a code of professional conduct that all educators, including flexi-adjunct teachers, are expected to adhere to. Educators should conduct themselves in a proper manner which upholds the honour and integrity of the teaching profession.”

In a post on Facebook dated 15 January which has been shared over 1,000 times and received 590 reactions, Ms Lenny lashed out at parents who do not teach their children basic language or read with them.

She called out parents who are too busy working to spend time with their children and questioned why they even had children in the first place.

She also stressed that reading is a basic necessity in every child’s life, just like food, clothes, and shelter and accused parents who do not teach their children of depriving them of education.

The post sparked a heated debate about who is responsible for teaching children how to read: teachers or parents.

A week later, Ms Lenney made a new Facebook apologising for the harshness of her initial rant. She said she was merely raising awareness of the issue and she stands by what she said.

Ms Lenny also said that she was asked to restrict the original post, which she did. But she chose not to delete it because she stands by her comments. Ms Lenny noted that she has since left the school she was working with.

Speaking to ST, Ms Lenny said she left the school voluntarily as she was concerned over her own safety after being threatened by members of the public for her statement. On top of that, she didn’t want to affect the school’s reputation.

Even so, Ms Lenny reiterated her stance, clarifying that her post was not directed at parents who are already trying to help their children. Rather, it was a ‘wake-up call’ to parents who ‘do not even want to try to get involved with their kids’ education’.

Some netizens agreed with the Ms Lenny’s stance about how parents should take more responsibility in teaching their children at home while one person in particular called for her to be reinstated:

 

Others were of the opinion that her departure was welcome, noting that her outburst was too harsh especially for an educator:

TOC has reached out to MOE for comment.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

爱哭鬼和近乎完美的国家

脸书时评专页The Alternative View,撰文批评部落客亚新(Nuseir Yassin),如果认为新加坡真是“近乎完美的国家”,那就尝试亲自体验成为公民所承担的负担: 买一间屋契期限仅剩一半的二手公共组屋 服两年半的兵役 把自己薪资37巴仙存入中央公积金 只能去政府医院和综合诊所。(如果耐心等候5至七个小时,可以进C级病房) 每天在繁忙上下班时段乘搭捷运通勤 事缘,亚新录制短片,赞扬新加坡为“近乎完美的国家”,短片中指在许多国家无法解决许多课题,新加坡人都有智慧办到,短片也邀请总理李显龙入镜。 对亚新的影片国人褒贬不一,有者认为,亚新的影片也中肯地反映了社会现实:财富不均、严格的社会管制和高昂物价等,但也有者指控,亚新收了广告费,来替当权者包装政绩。 对于这些指控,亚新直接针对The…

【国会】林瑞莲不呈休会动议 待内政部长声明辩论巴蒂案

工人党主席林瑞莲,在9月中旬针对前女佣巴蒂案判决,提出休会动议申请。 9月29日,国会议长陈川仁更新贴文,表示来临国会会议有多达五项休会动议申请,经过抽签决定,林瑞莲的动议未被选中,反之议员黄国光探讨家中二手烟的议题,将在来临国会议事上讨论。 与此同时,陈川仁也在贴文的留言,指坊间对于林的动议未被选中,出现一些假论述,也澄清一项动议现在没被抽中,不代表下次不会被选中。 据了解,工人党今日(2日)发表声明,指出该党主席林瑞莲不会再提呈休会动议,反之工人党将待部长声明期间,参与辩论。 目前警方和总检察署,针对巴蒂案件的内部检讨仍在进行,内政兼律政部长尚穆根,早前表示将在国会发表部长声明。 不过,工人党认为,尽管内部检讨仍在进行,对于巴蒂案件反映刑事司法制度更广泛的问题,有必要采取适当的措施去回应相关缺失。 工人党强调应增强司法系统,确保她应为所有群众服务。巴蒂案涉及的强烈群众利益、以及群众诉诸法律的相关问题,也预示着在讨论贫困或弱势群体诉诸正义的壳体上,将出现批判性的公共舆论。 前女佣巴蒂案的最新判决,犹如抛下震撼弹,例如法官陈成安点名廖家父子报警“存不良意图”、警方移交赃物的疑点等等,都迫使警方、总检察署等各造需要对事件彻查,民众也期待此案能有个交代。

【国会】尚穆根:“合力追踪”数据 如有特别需要或作呈堂证供

内政部兼律政部长尚穆根表示,警方若使用完“合力追踪”数据,就会把数据删除,如有必要,才会提呈上堂证供。 针对荷兰-武吉知马集选区国会议员迪舒沙的质询时,尚穆根坦言如无必要,警方会将数据删除,否则将作为呈堂证供。 “如无特定需求,是的,是会删除。不然就是将其呈堂。” 尚穆根表示,即使数据不准备上法庭,但若在庭审时有所需要,也会呈上。对此,反对党领袖毕丹星追问,要求说明在何种情况下,警方会需要调动数据作为调查。 尚穆根:只要是“不限制警方行使权力”的法律都有权调动 尚穆根则答复,根据刑事诉讼法第20条文,只要是“不限制警方行使权力”的法律,警方都有权调动或恢复任何个人信息。 但尚穆根也举例,如涉及谋杀罪案,“合力追踪”数据很可能会有受害者或与受害者家属相关的信息。 “如果警方选择不使用这些信息,你可以想象受害者家属的心情,当然其他新加坡人会如何看待。你可以争辩说,在这种情况下,还是可以有司法审查的申请。” 仅限用于重大罪行的调查所需 不过,尚穆根也解释,“合力追踪”的开发本身就是为了防疫做准备,因此警方仅限用于非常重大的罪行的调查,且目前尚未有任何法律效应,但警方也会审慎考虑这项规定,酌情向“合力追踪”提出调动数据的可能。 内政部政务部长陈国明在今日(4日)国会答复议员质询时表示,刑事程序法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据。 对此,阿裕尼集选区严燕松则质问,若数据能够被调动,是否有违反“合力追踪”的隐私规定,令公众使用“合力追踪”的自愿性更低。…