Source: STOMP ST

The tragic electrocution of 15 year old Tan Yao Bin while he was taking a shower due to improper wiring and a faulty circuit breaker in his HDB flat has been called an “unfortunate misadventure”. Based on reports however, this sounds more like death caused by gross negligence rather than an “unfortunate misadventure”.  Gross negligence not just by the two workmen who connected the water heater but by the original builders of the HDB flat!

First and foremost, why are unlicensed electricians permitted to hold themselves out as able to connect electronic products? Is there criminal misrepresentation here? Secondly, it would appear that the unlicensed electricians had connected the wires based on “what was already there.” This would imply that it was already unsafe to begin with and an accident waiting to happen. What does this say of the original HDB works? Has the HDB been shoddy in their work?

What causes even more concern is one workman’s statement that based on his experience with over 30 HDB blocks, almost 78 per cent of water heaters were connected in this manner. Does this mean that so many other people are susceptible to this risk of electrocution every time they take a shower? That is a scary thought! Especially in hot and humid Singapore where people take multiple showers a day! How many times a day are we unknowingly subjecting ourselves to these risks of electrocution just by the simple act of taking a shower?

The coroner has cautioned on the importance of safety in handling electronic objects but I don’t think this adequately deals with the case at hand because in this case, the wiring was faulty! How can we be more careful if it is the product that is faulty to begin with? She furthered sounded a word of caution to workmen to be more “mindful” but this isn’t about mindfulness! This is negligence!

Will there be an investigation on all HDB blocks to ensure that the wiring is not faulty? Considering that the workmen were simply reinstating “what was already there”, this could mean that this faulty wiring is prevalent! If we are to prevent another senseless death such as this death, nothing short of an investigation and rectification of all flats that have this type of faulty plugs and wiring will suffice! To call this senseless and needless death an “unfortunate misadventure” trivialises life and makes a mockery out of the meaning of accountability.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tan Kin Lian receives backlash for publishing his NRIC online, but is NRIC actually an information that is well-secured?

On 27 May (Monday), the ex-presidential candidate and former CEO of NTUC…

Scientists say coronavirus can stay alive for long period under high heat, posing threat to lab workers

Based on an experiment conducted by a team of French scientist, it…

Tsunami warning as 7.8 quake hits off Alaska: USGS

A 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck off the Alaskan peninsula, triggering a tsunami warning…

社论:当拥屋成了信仰

撰文:Property Soul 翻译:北雁 我们的总理告诉我们,居者有其屋成了国家政策重要指标。 高达90巴仙的拥屋率显著地改善国人生活,让我们分享国家经济成长的果实,也有愿为之奋斗的家园。 我们的领袖还有必要一再强调,这个所有国人都有目共睹的事吗? 我们到底是在不满什么? 从上世纪50年代的拥挤贫民窟和简陋寮屋,发展至今我们已经拥有世界级水平的公共组屋。建屋发展局的组屋提供家户安稳的环境,营造促进团结的邻里氛围。 政府高度津贴公共组屋,我们可用公积金来偿还贷款、由市镇会管理组屋区。同时,还有选择性重建计划(SERS)和自愿提早重建计划(VERS)等协助为老组屋增值。 为什么国人还是对公共组屋诸多怨言呢? 为何国家发展部长黄循财,一句“不是所有组屋都能获选SERS计划”,惊醒许多组屋住户? 为什么那句“99年租赁组屋是自有产权,而不是租户”,仍让许多国人失望?因为黄循财显示所言,几乎粉碎了国人的房屋梦。…