Public residential condominium building complex and downtown skylines at Kallang neighborhood in Singapore. Storm cloud sky from Shutterstock

The fact that the ministers in the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) run government get high salaries while there are reports of people living in dumpsters and old people working as cleaners are a common sight in Singapore can certainly be considered proof that there is truth in what the Oxfam index on the tackling of income inequality says in its placing Singapore in the bottom ten positions.

Yet instead of giving due consideration to the results yielded by the Oxfam report, our government has seemingly disregarded it in totality, choosing only to focus on the positive results yielded by the World Bank and the World Economic Forum.

It is interesting to note that Oxfam has publicly chided the World Bank by stating:“It is irresponsible for the World Bank to promote the deregulation of labour and the dismantling of the rights that workers have long fought for. The report downplays the severity of inequality and contradicts internationally agreed labour standards.

Just last week, the IMF said “higher minimum wages are needed to counteract extreme inequality”.

In my humble opinion, each of these bodies have separate concerns and that a balance of all of their views is necessary for a country such as Singapore to protect the rights and livelihoods of its citizens while also ensuring that the country continues to attract foreign investment.

The Oxfam report was more focused on the domestic living conditions of citizens while the WEF and World Bank are focused on the international commercial standing of a given country. When viewed in that perspective, does one report have to be right while the other wrong?

Wouldn’t it be more helpful if we saw the value in each finding and seek to take each report on board equally?

Singapore is indeed an attractive place in which to do business. It has relatively low corporate tax and is creditor friendly. From that perspective, it attracts investment and can create opportunities for those in the finance or technological sectors.

On the other hand, it is also imperative to note that this type of growth may not benefit everyone if the playing field is not level and this is where Oxfam is coming from. From this perspective, must one finding be wrong in order for the other to be right?

Inequality does not benefit any society because it will eventually lead to instability. While the Singapore government is more than entitled to be disappointed by how Singapore has fared in Oxfam’s findings, it should not be disappointed by Oxfam. Oxfam is just doing what is within its remit to do. The Singapore government needs to take both praise and criticism with grace and maturity.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Survey: 35% think Heng can understand ordinary Singaporeans but 21% doubt so

Current Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat has now been portrayed in media…

两国交长坐下来谈 许文远献议延长二临时措施期限

据《联合早报》报导,去年尾因领空纠纷隔空交锋的我国交通部长许文远和马国交长陆兆福,于昨日进行会谈,双方建议延长有关领空纠纷的两项暂时措施,包括暂缓启用仪表江路系统(ILS)。 新马两国外长于本月8日商谈,当时双方同意在领空议题上双方各让一步。马国暂缓宣布新山巴西古当上空成为永久禁飞区。不过,两项暂缓措施仅为期一个月,即在下月8日到期。 为此,许文远向陆兆福建议延长暂缓措施期限,让两国官员有更充裕时间讨论,已取得双赢成果。陆兆福则表示会将此建议带回马国内阁和同僚讨论。 与陆兆福“交心”讨论 许文远在脸书形容, 与陆兆福进行了“交心”讨论,这已是第三次与后者会面。他说,将在农历新年后再见面继续针对领空议题会谈,不过未透露具体日期。 陆兆福的脸书贴文也分享,两人昨早会面商谈“有成果和建设性”,双方同意针对有关实里达机场和两国民航局面对的技术问题,持续进行讨论。 在本月八日,马国外交部长赛夫丁到访我国,与我国外长维文针对新马领空和港口边界课题进行商讨。除了暂缓了两项措施,双方同意设立海事工作团队,研究和商讨海域问题的法律和运作事宜,并缓解局势,为进一步的谈判建立基础。 当时,维文还形容与赛夫丁“进行了正面和有建设性的交流”,并且承诺加强两国双边关系。

ELD: S$9.1 million spent by candidates for GE2020; an increase of S$2 million from previous GE

The Elections Department (ELD) has revealed that more than S$9 million was…

MND's statement on town councils: Another “half the story” clarification?

By S Y Lee and Leong Sze Hian We refer to the…