Public residential condominium building complex and downtown skylines at Kallang neighborhood in Singapore. Storm cloud sky from Shutterstock

The fact that the ministers in the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) run government get high salaries while there are reports of people living in dumpsters and old people working as cleaners are a common sight in Singapore can certainly be considered proof that there is truth in what the Oxfam index on the tackling of income inequality says in its placing Singapore in the bottom ten positions.

Yet instead of giving due consideration to the results yielded by the Oxfam report, our government has seemingly disregarded it in totality, choosing only to focus on the positive results yielded by the World Bank and the World Economic Forum.

It is interesting to note that Oxfam has publicly chided the World Bank by stating:“It is irresponsible for the World Bank to promote the deregulation of labour and the dismantling of the rights that workers have long fought for. The report downplays the severity of inequality and contradicts internationally agreed labour standards.

Just last week, the IMF said “higher minimum wages are needed to counteract extreme inequality”.

In my humble opinion, each of these bodies have separate concerns and that a balance of all of their views is necessary for a country such as Singapore to protect the rights and livelihoods of its citizens while also ensuring that the country continues to attract foreign investment.

The Oxfam report was more focused on the domestic living conditions of citizens while the WEF and World Bank are focused on the international commercial standing of a given country. When viewed in that perspective, does one report have to be right while the other wrong?

Wouldn’t it be more helpful if we saw the value in each finding and seek to take each report on board equally?

Singapore is indeed an attractive place in which to do business. It has relatively low corporate tax and is creditor friendly. From that perspective, it attracts investment and can create opportunities for those in the finance or technological sectors.

On the other hand, it is also imperative to note that this type of growth may not benefit everyone if the playing field is not level and this is where Oxfam is coming from. From this perspective, must one finding be wrong in order for the other to be right?

Inequality does not benefit any society because it will eventually lead to instability. While the Singapore government is more than entitled to be disappointed by how Singapore has fared in Oxfam’s findings, it should not be disappointed by Oxfam. Oxfam is just doing what is within its remit to do. The Singapore government needs to take both praise and criticism with grace and maturity.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

43 yr-old naturalised Singaporean deprived of citizenship for committing criminal acts prejudicial to interests of Singapore

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has announced that a 43-year-old naturalised…

SRC makes initial $50,000 contribution for relief and recovery efforts in Nepal and appeals for contribution

The Singapore Red Cross (SRC) will be disbursing SGD $50,000 worth of…

本月第六起! 六海盗图洗劫油船失手逃

续23日凌晨新加坡海峡有两艘船只遭海盗袭击,在圣诞凌晨再发生一宗海盗袭击事件,至少六名海盗登船,不过所幸船员及时拉响警报,海盗再次空手而归。 根据亚洲区域反海盗合作协定(RECAAP)资讯共享中心文告,事件发生在本月25日凌晨12时28分。名为Stena Immortal 的油槽船当时正经过新加坡海峡向东航行。 当时有六名海盗登船,在引擎室的首席工程师发现后,立即拉响警报通知船长。六名海盗听到警报响起,便离开甲板乘坐小艇逃离。所幸未有船员受伤和蒙受财物损失。 该船船长将此事通报新加坡船舶交通资讯系统(VTIS)。船只在新加坡港口靠岸后,新加警察海岸卫队(PCG)便登船进行调查。 促执法机构协调加强巡逻 这已是今年内在新加坡海峡发生的第30宗海盗事件。RECAAP在文告中对新加坡海峡海盗事件越发频密表达高度关注。“有鉴于犯案者仍未绳之于法,在新加坡海峡很有可能再发生类似事件。” RECAAP也提醒来往船只宜提高警觉、做好防范措施,若有事故立即通报邻近海岸的执法机构。 RECAAP也敦促执法机构加强巡逻和协调监视工作,以期能对这些事件迅速采取行动。 根据RECAAP文告,在本月20日也分享另外三起发生在新加坡海峡的海盗事件,涉及两艘货船和一艘油船。 23日凌晨,凌晨两小时内,一艘货运船和一艘油槽船分别被海盗登船,船员虽被绑,不过好在及时响起警报,海盗只得空手而逃。

Khaw Boon Wan: Footpaths in Singapore wide enough to accommodate both pedestrians and cyclist at same time

Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan has stated in Parliament that footpaths…