palm gardens
By Property Soul
A Singaporean man is suing his ex-lover for the return of gifts given to her during their courtship, including $340,000 for a condominium unit bought under the woman’s name.
The ex-lover defended that he offered the property to her as a gift. He only asked for its return when their relationship turned soured.
On the other hand, the man complained of being cheated. He claimed that he was the rightful owner of the property. He purchased the property for investment. She was only holding it in trust and she knew that it had to be returned one day. He added that he wouldn’t even give his wife such a big present. He was hinting that his ex-lover, who is even younger than his eldest child, is merely a dispensable mistress in his eyes.
After the case was reported in the media, negative comments from netizens poured in. Sorry but our society only has sympathy for old woman conned by adopted China-born grandson. For old man cheated by China-born mistress, there is only contempt and mockery for his lust and naivety. If ladies had to use one word to describe ex who asks for compensation after break-up, it would be ‘cheap’.
Guys usually give expensive gifts to ladies under three circumstances:

  1. When there are special occasions like birthdays, anniversaries, Valentine’s Day or Christmas (from generous guys only).
  2. Before or during courtship, they like to impress their crush with gifts in the hope of winning her heart.
  3. When they have done something very wrong and need to part with a small fortune to ask for forgiveness.

In all of the three situations, if the gift fails to serve its purpose – the gift giver has unrequited love, is not being forgiven or is asked to buy a better gift – the original gift will only be returned based on goodwill.
In other words, it is not an obligation to do so, no matter how valuable the gift is. If the lady decides not to return it, she has the right to keep it as a memory of their good times. The gift giver has no right to sue in order to get it back.
The same applies to anyone giving away property as gift.
Besides lovers and couples, some parents may buy properties in their children’s name as a gift, an interest-free loan or an investment. Some are buying their kids a roof over their head in face of soaring property prices. Others are doing it to borrow a bigger loan from the bank.
Whether you are a doting lover, spouse or parent, before you decide to buy property as a gift, please read the following advice extracted from a relevant article in my book No B.S. to Property Investment.
1. You have no claim if it’s a gift
Wikipedia’s explanation of a gift is ‘the transfer of something without the expectation of payment.’
Since it is a ‘gift’, by law you have no right to ask for it back, nor can you ask for anything in return, because you are giving it away out of your own free will, and not doing it under force or an unsound mind.
If something unplanned happens, say you are in financial difficulty or being made a bankrupt; or the relationship turns sour; or you want to transfer the property to another family member, you have no right to do so. It is because legally you have no right in the property.
You may be confident that (the gift receiver) will sell the property on your request and return the money to you after the sale. Remember that this is only based on trust or goodwill. It is not backed by law in any way.
2. Protect yourself if it’s a loan or an investment
If your intention is to buy the property as a pseudo interest-free (or low interest) loan, or if you are only buying it for your own investment, you should always back it up with a formal legal document.
Don’t take your chances. Have a side agreement signed by both parties. Specify clearly under what circumstances (the gift receiver) should sell or pay you back your sum of investment.
You don’t have to show it to any third party at this moment. Keep it somewhere safe and show it to your lawyer in the event of a dispute.
Have proper documentation of any evidence, including a copy or a receipt of the cheque for deposit, downpayment, loan repayment, etc. You need them in case of any argument.
(Note: The recommendations here are for your reference only. You are advised to consult a lawyer for advice on your specific case.)
You may like to read my previous post Buying properties in your child’s name.
This article was first published at propertysoul.com

 

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

LTA wins Prince Michael International Road Safety Award

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) announces that it won the prestigious Prince…

More residents come forward to reveal foreigners have used their residence address without permission when registering with MOM

On 25 April (Thursday), TOC published a story about a netizen named…

【武汉冠状病毒】本地累计确诊病例81起 新增四起都与此前病例有关

根据卫生部文告,本地截至18日中午12时,再增加四起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,本地累计确诊病例81起,不过迄今已有29名患者出院,四人病危。 上述新增病患其中三人:第78、80和81起病例,与神召会恩典堂有关,迄今该感染群已累计21人受感染。 第78起病例是57岁女公民,曾在福利组织运营的社区医院工作,不过她负责行政事务,自出现症状后就未接触病患。 她在9日出现不适,并分别于10日和17日看诊,17日被送往国家传染病中心,同日确诊。 第80例则是38岁女公民,在国大医院做行政工作。文告指她与第66例(28岁男公民,在神召会恩典堂工作)有关联。其余和第66例有关联的,还包括第68(79岁女公民)和第70例(27岁女公民)(家属),以及曾与他接触的第71位病患。 第81起病例则是50岁男公民,同样与神召会恩典堂有关,在今日确诊。 至于第79为病例则是35岁的马来西亚女子,近期未到过中国是工作准证持有者,住在兀兰弯。 在接到隔离指示前,她在海军部FoodXchange工作,不过没处理食品。他是此前确诊的第72例家属。她是在12日感到不适,并因为曾与第72例近接触,从15日开始在家隔离。在17日送往国家传染病中心并确诊。 第72病患是40岁中国籍的工作准证持有者,但近期未曾回中国。他和第59例(61岁私人医院麻醉医生)有关联,但不是后者的病人。 一岁男童出院 另一方面,在周日(16日)确诊的一岁男童(第76例),和其他四位病患都在今日治愈出院。他是在本月9日从武汉撤返我国的乘客之一。