By Property Soul
diamond-ring
Last night, I asked you whether you are married or not. There was dead air for ten seconds before you replied “I still consider myself single”.
I was expecting a simple yes or no answer from you. This marital status question from my heart only offers two options: single or married, or at most with two more for divorced or widowed.
Sorry a vague answer won’t open you to more options. Because I am naturally confused by ‘yes but’ answers.
Don’t tell me that you are single but attached, married but available, single but engaged, married but separated, or single but living together. You may say it’s complicated but I don’t want to know.
Cut the crap that you two have applied for a flat but haven’t registered for marriage. Or you get that marriage certificate to collect the key to the flat but haven’t gone through a wedding ceremony.
I am asking you whether you’ve popped the question, taken the vow and signed on the dotted line. Who cares whether you will throw a wedding or not?
Your answer only shows that you don’t have the confidence in marriage or the faith in your better half. Maybe you are just biding your time or trying to work around it.
Statistics show that 22 percent who apply for BTO flats under the fiance/fiancee scheme will subsequently give it up in the next 4 years. Are you going to be one of them? Are you prepared to pay that 5 percent penalty for your BTO or 20 percent for your DBSS or EC?
This time every year is the peak season when couples-to-be are busy distributing pink envelopes. They all rush to tie the knot in time for the auspicious dates end of the year. Who wants to wait till Chinese New Year to entertain that familiar question from nosy relatives again?
As time goes by, one day you might be one of those who finally say ‘I do’ with that one carat diamond – all under the pressure of ‘failure to launch’.


 
Last month, I called the developer to ask them whether their new project has been launched. There was dead air over the phone for ten seconds before they replied “it is not an official launch yet”.
I was expecting a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer from them. Back in my mind I can think of answers like ‘it was launched (on a certain date)’, ‘to be launched (on a certain date)’, or ‘it is not ready to launch yet’.
This vague answer may create suspense and excitement for prospective buyers and eager sellers. But I am often confused by ‘yes but not yet’ answers.
There are already so many terms like new launch, pre-launch, VIP launch, private launch, official launch, by invitations, by appointment only, etc. Developers may say VIP and sincere buyers are given priority. But honestly, what makes the difference here?
Please don’t keep delaying or explaining different phases to launch the project. It’s fair that developers want to test the market. But how long and how many times are they going to do so?
I am asking when the project is ready to launch in the market, when interested parties can visit the sales gallery and showflat and when buyers can book their chosen units. Why can’t they confirm a definite date?
I can sense from the developer’s response that they lack confidence in the market and have doubts whether there will be positive response of their project. Maybe they are just biding time to find a better occasion to take the plunge.
The data from Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) shows that 15 percent of uncompleted private residential units launched were still unsold as of end of 2nd quarter, while 34 percent of total number of units were unsold as of August 2014. Developers have to prepare to pay extension charges of 8 to 24 percent of the land price for any project with unsold units two years after TOP.
This time every year is the peak season when developers are busy launching their new projects after the Chinese ghost month and ahead of the holiday season. Who wants to wait till Chinese New Year when no one has the time to look at properties?
Last weekend, for just one Saturday, there were countless advertisements in Straits Times: calling for e-application for ECs like Lake Life, Bellewoods and Bellewaters; launch of new projects like Marina One Residences, The Crest, 70 Saint Patrick’s, Luxus Hills, Forte Suites, Highline Residences, Kallang Riverside, Mon Jervois, The Rise@Oxley and Avant Parc; and marketing or re-launch of existing projects like Marina Bay Suites, The Scotts Tower, One Shenton, V on Shenton, Riverbank, Jewel@Buangkok, The Interlace, Lakeville and Coco Palms.
Where can the developers find so many interested buyers to go for 22 sales galleries in just one weekend?
Even taking a walk near the MRT station would be stopped by property agents persuading me to upgrade to an Executive Condominium (EC). A causal visit to their competitor’s showflat had an eager agent trying to fill out the application form for me. Another sales gallery was dangling a dazzling one carat diamond that looks irresistible.
At the end of the day, the official launch date is determined not by the readiness to launch, but by the fear of being left behind due to ‘failure to launch’.
This article was first published at propertysoul.com
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

2015年东运会风波:苏睿勇向刘威延管理公司索100万赔偿

两届东运会马拉松冠军得主苏睿勇,与我国另名知名马拉松运动员刘威延风波仍未有结果,但随着苏针对毁谤事件,向刘威延的运动管理公司提出100万元的赔偿,再度引起关注。 苏睿勇代表律师于15日,向管理刘威延运动事业的公司One Management发出律师信,称该公司所发出的三项指控涉诽谤,损害苏的职业地位与声誉,因而向公司与其合伙人Jed Senthil K Jivaraju要求各50万赔偿。 信中表明,若未获得赔偿及让步,苏睿勇将会对两者提出诽谤控诉。 One Management由Jed Senthil K Jivaraju与前马拉松选手莫英任创立,旗下公司包括ONEathlete和RunOne,负责管理刘威延运动事业。而该公司分别曾于去年10月21日、今年4月2日与9日表示对苏睿勇的控诉表示异议。…

申请法援挑战政府假消息裁定 人权律师质疑可行度

政府将在下月于国会寻求通过《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》。然而该法被指赋予部长过多的权力、制衡机制不足,也引起公民社会的质疑和忧虑。 在上周四(4月3日)律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉出席管理大学对话会。针对一名与会者质疑若假消息来自政府又如何处置,对此他打包票指出,政府并不会凌驾于法律体系之外,完全不受到监督。 反假消息法也被指透过法律刑责,来制造寒蝉效应,造成民众因担忧招惹官司而被高昂诉讼费缠身,而不敢再批评政府政策。 对于官司费的担忧,唐振辉认为,目前国内已有充足的经济和法律援助供有需要者申请,对部长的更正指示作出上诉。 不过,人权律师M拉维就在脸书发文,质疑上述申请法律援助来上诉的实际可行性。 “老实说,我不曾听闻有人申请法律援助来挑战政府的决定。就算可以,还有大部分人都不符合申请法律援助条件,没办法这么做。” 在新起草的防假消息法案下,部长若判断某消息为假消息并可能威胁公共利益,就可下达指示要求更正或撤下。 然而,令拉维感到不安的是,假设政府本身,涉及借用官方媒体散播假消息,有关法案却没有明确途径让公民挑战政府。在该法案第61条文下,部长还能发出“免死金牌”给特定人物或机构,比如说,可以发出指示,豁免某部门或官方媒体,不受法案的对付。 他质疑,普通老百姓怎么可能负担得起动辄至少八万元的诉讼费,到高庭去挑战部长对假新闻的裁定有误。 去年担任蓄意散播假消息特选委员会主席的张有福曾指出,若对政府的裁定有不满,应有足够的管道,且上诉过程不会太繁琐。 他在昨日也接受《联合早报》采访,认为尽管新法案赋予部长权利,迅速采取措施以维护国家利益,但高庭可对其决定进行审核,而不是由政府全权定夺。 他同意,应允许不满者尽快做出申诉,而不是让他们耗费数年和上千元庭费来打官司。“既然部长有权迅速介入,要求个人或网络平台更正或撤下信息,那另一方上诉时也理应获得加速审理,以确保公平。”…

Hospitals visits to resume on 19 August for fully vaccinated and those with valid negative COVID-19 tests

Starting 19 August, people can visit hospitals if they have been fully…

【舆论】杨莉明续任人力部长 其治下客工宿舍疫情、PMET议题惹诟病

我国7月25日宣布新届内阁名单,杨莉明续任人力部长一职,引起各界关注,因为她在处理客工宿舍疫情爆发一事,无法有效遏制疫情而遭诟病。 早在2月份时,就有客工确诊,包括实里达航空岭感染群;然而,如今新加坡的确诊人数持续攀升,杨莉明仍没有选择向公众道歉,并承认政府的疏失,而是拒绝道歉,因为她声称,要求当局道歉的客工,她一个也没遇上。 显然任何成年人给出这样的理由就已经令人震惊,更何况是身为部长,竟然给出这样的借口,简直让人难以相信。如今新加坡确诊人数持续攀升,但杨莉明仍然保住官位,请问公共责任在哪里? 撇开客工的问题不谈,人力部长杨莉明再次因专业人士、经理、执行员和技师(PMET)课题被抨击,即没有将外国PMET聘雇人数减少而引起争议。公平考量框架(Fair Consideration Framework)于2014年生效,以此增加新加坡人的劳动力,但外国PMET人数仍然未有锐减的现象。 人力部日前宣布47名雇主由于涉嫌出现歧视性聘雇的现象,已被列入公平考量框架的观察名单。 “我们会对招聘标准进行更严格的审查,以确保本地雇主不会出现国籍偏见,这是无法接受的,同时也符合公平、基于业绩的招聘。” 人力部还宣布将会针对240家涉嫌不遵守条规或可能预先聘雇外国人的公司进行调查。 这一切看似很好,但它显然已是存在许久的课题。事实上,已有在野党和其他媒体不断强调,而公平考量框架建立迄今已有六年之久,为何聘雇人数仍未锐减,是否缺乏其政治意愿? 虽然人力部如今不断强调会严格审查他们(外国人)的就业准证申请,让不合作或执意不改变的雇主削减他们的工作准证特权,但人力部正以何种评估标准对他们?难道就不应该设立一个客观和透明的标准,确保公平和问责性吗? 承上所述,无论是客工确诊病例持续递增或是外国PMET数量未有减少,均在杨莉明的监督下,但她的存在也似有若无,所以为何她仍然能够持续领导这部门?…