By Property Soul
diamond-ring
Last night, I asked you whether you are married or not. There was dead air for ten seconds before you replied “I still consider myself single”.
I was expecting a simple yes or no answer from you. This marital status question from my heart only offers two options: single or married, or at most with two more for divorced or widowed.
Sorry a vague answer won’t open you to more options. Because I am naturally confused by ‘yes but’ answers.
Don’t tell me that you are single but attached, married but available, single but engaged, married but separated, or single but living together. You may say it’s complicated but I don’t want to know.
Cut the crap that you two have applied for a flat but haven’t registered for marriage. Or you get that marriage certificate to collect the key to the flat but haven’t gone through a wedding ceremony.
I am asking you whether you’ve popped the question, taken the vow and signed on the dotted line. Who cares whether you will throw a wedding or not?
Your answer only shows that you don’t have the confidence in marriage or the faith in your better half. Maybe you are just biding your time or trying to work around it.
Statistics show that 22 percent who apply for BTO flats under the fiance/fiancee scheme will subsequently give it up in the next 4 years. Are you going to be one of them? Are you prepared to pay that 5 percent penalty for your BTO or 20 percent for your DBSS or EC?
This time every year is the peak season when couples-to-be are busy distributing pink envelopes. They all rush to tie the knot in time for the auspicious dates end of the year. Who wants to wait till Chinese New Year to entertain that familiar question from nosy relatives again?
As time goes by, one day you might be one of those who finally say ‘I do’ with that one carat diamond – all under the pressure of ‘failure to launch’.


 
Last month, I called the developer to ask them whether their new project has been launched. There was dead air over the phone for ten seconds before they replied “it is not an official launch yet”.
I was expecting a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer from them. Back in my mind I can think of answers like ‘it was launched (on a certain date)’, ‘to be launched (on a certain date)’, or ‘it is not ready to launch yet’.
This vague answer may create suspense and excitement for prospective buyers and eager sellers. But I am often confused by ‘yes but not yet’ answers.
There are already so many terms like new launch, pre-launch, VIP launch, private launch, official launch, by invitations, by appointment only, etc. Developers may say VIP and sincere buyers are given priority. But honestly, what makes the difference here?
Please don’t keep delaying or explaining different phases to launch the project. It’s fair that developers want to test the market. But how long and how many times are they going to do so?
I am asking when the project is ready to launch in the market, when interested parties can visit the sales gallery and showflat and when buyers can book their chosen units. Why can’t they confirm a definite date?
I can sense from the developer’s response that they lack confidence in the market and have doubts whether there will be positive response of their project. Maybe they are just biding time to find a better occasion to take the plunge.
The data from Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) shows that 15 percent of uncompleted private residential units launched were still unsold as of end of 2nd quarter, while 34 percent of total number of units were unsold as of August 2014. Developers have to prepare to pay extension charges of 8 to 24 percent of the land price for any project with unsold units two years after TOP.
This time every year is the peak season when developers are busy launching their new projects after the Chinese ghost month and ahead of the holiday season. Who wants to wait till Chinese New Year when no one has the time to look at properties?
Last weekend, for just one Saturday, there were countless advertisements in Straits Times: calling for e-application for ECs like Lake Life, Bellewoods and Bellewaters; launch of new projects like Marina One Residences, The Crest, 70 Saint Patrick’s, Luxus Hills, Forte Suites, Highline Residences, Kallang Riverside, Mon Jervois, The Rise@Oxley and Avant Parc; and marketing or re-launch of existing projects like Marina Bay Suites, The Scotts Tower, One Shenton, V on Shenton, Riverbank, Jewel@Buangkok, The Interlace, Lakeville and Coco Palms.
Where can the developers find so many interested buyers to go for 22 sales galleries in just one weekend?
Even taking a walk near the MRT station would be stopped by property agents persuading me to upgrade to an Executive Condominium (EC). A causal visit to their competitor’s showflat had an eager agent trying to fill out the application form for me. Another sales gallery was dangling a dazzling one carat diamond that looks irresistible.
At the end of the day, the official launch date is determined not by the readiness to launch, but by the fear of being left behind due to ‘failure to launch’.
This article was first published at propertysoul.com
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AVA voted against proposals to conserve endangered species in CITES

On Saturday 13th July 2013, in a public forum held during the…

林鼎抨击唯才是举制 避谈群众功劳夸耀自身才干

新加坡人民之声党领袖林鼎,录制视频浅谈新加坡的“唯才是举”现象,批评一些政治和商界领袖出现沾沾自喜的傲慢态度,避谈携手创造成就的群众,反而谎称正是他们的才能和“精明决策”,自己才值得拥有优渥收入。 林鼎先是分享“唯才是举”一说的起源。1958年,英国社会和工党政治家麦可杨(Michael Young),在他的一本讽刺小说《唯才是举的崛起》,发明了“Meritocracy”这个词汇。 他在这本小说描绘一个想象中的未来英国,这个社会把智力和才干价值奉为中心原则,把社会阶层分为精英阶层和缺乏才干的阶层,出现严重不平等。 麦可杨深知唯才是举制度的危害,在2001年,他在英国《卫报》一篇抨击英国首相布莱尔的文章,毫不留情地抨击唯才是举制度: “这些精英相信、当然他们也一再被鼓吹,他们凭藉自己的实力才干取得成就。他们会认为自己值得拥有这一切,不免感到沾沾自喜,相比下,他人可能知道他们的成就,只不过是受益于裙带关系、他们是某某人的子女,而不是因为他们的才干。 精英新贵甚至迷信自身权位的道德正当性(全凭自己的努力和成绩),因而更加肆无忌惮地捞取好处,忘却并背叛了原有的出身,导致下层阶级失去民意代言人,逐渐在民主进程中失声,最终产生政治疏离感。” 林鼎揶揄行动党对于如何引领国家继续发展,已“黔驴技穷”。他分析,唯才是举的弊端之一,在于只有一部分的才干价值、精英才会被提拔,而且需符合建制阶层的心意。 “而个人才能乃是基于打分制评估,反而对那些掌握优势的孩子更有利。” 此外,麦可杨也批评社会上流阶层无可避免地会表现得沾沾自喜和傲慢,认为他们享有的荣华富贵是应得的;至于对于那些较不幸群体,他们只是耸耸肩,认为每个人都得到他们应得的。 “麦可杨也批评,就因为维护特定阶层的体制、让底下阶层生而贫穷,这是不公平的。” 林鼎转而指责,现如今许多政治和商界领袖也展现这种沾沾自喜的态度,他们避谈今日他们的成就,乃是因为共同打造这个国家的群众携手创造的,反之谎称他们的收入,是基于自己的才干和“精明决策”争取而来。…

Ong Ye Kung: We might well be the most vaccinated country in the world

In an interview with Singapore Press Holdings’ (SPH) radio station Kiss92 FM…

Attorney-General’s Chambers threatens veteran lawyer representing acquitted anaesthetist with disciplinary action

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) is threatening the counsel of an acquitted anaesthetist…