Speech by Chen Show Mao, MP for Aljunied GRC in the debate on President’s Address (30 May 2014)
Mdm,
Earlier in this debate, Minister Gan Kim Yong announced that a national conversation will be entered into over the next few months to draw up a national action plan for successful ageing.  Issues in lifelong learning, employment, volunteerism, urban infrastructure, health care, retirement adequacy and research into ageing will all be discussed. I wish the Minister success in this important undertaking. In this connection, The Minister also called for a change of mind set “from worrying about the challenges that come from ageing to celebrating longevity”. This is welcome.
For my part, I would like to say again a couple of things that I said before in this House, which I believe will be useful for us to keep in mind as we embark on drawing up our national action plan for successful ageing.
First, In addition to the challenges it presents, the ageing of our population also gives us opportunities as a nation to invest in the human capital of our senior citizens, for great social returns,
Investing in elderly Singaporeans will reward our society with the economic, social and cultural contributions they are able to make with our assistance. It will also enable us to be inclusive, which is the basis for community and social cohesion.
Economic benefits can be realized from investments made to redesign jobs, workplaces, work processes and even our work culture to allow us to more fully draw on the experience and know- how that older workers are able to offer, in spite of physical bodies starting to slow down, and to allow older workers to remain as productive as or even more productive than their younger counterparts.
The elderly are also a repository of social and cultural capital. With some investment that helps keep them close to their homes, we can leverage our elders’ longstanding ties in mature neighbourhoods to teach our children traditional wisdoms and values, and share stories and lessons about our communities. Our elderly can also be employed in schools to teach subjects in social studies and national education, or be encouraged to volunteer to do so.
Let us continue to invest in Singaporeans even as they age and become elderly. But what forms will such investments take? It is a good thing that seniors themselves will participate in the national conversation about a “Nation for all ages”. It is a good thing that they will express preferences for different active aging activities and lifelong learning courses or programs. But whatever these preferences, perhaps we could look into providing a pillar that will help support investments by our elderly in their human capital?  Just like children who need to develop and working adults who need to upgrade their skills, our elderly too need support and resources to continue growing, learning and developing.
A second pillar.  Informal caregivers often make it possible for our elderly to age in place – in their homes, in the community. In 2010, it was estimated that approximately 8% of Singaporean adults provided regular care to family members or friends, providing on average 6.8 hours a day of care in a typical week.
It appears to me that an important pillar to enable successful ageing would be the support we provide to our informal caregivers.
It is well documented that caregivers often suffer declines in their own financial circumstances, and mental and physical health, as a result of their caregiving role.
As other members have suggested, support may take the form of leave for the informal caregivers, or the right to ask for flexible work arrangements, or CPF top-ups, not because we want to monetise the act of caring for their loved ones, but to help ease some of the financial strains that may arise from their taking on such informal caregiving arrangements.
Many members believe that providing more support to our informal caregivers is the right thing to do.
And Mdm, As was said on the opening day of this debate, it is not so much what is said, but what is done, that will be the measure of our progress.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

水獭私闯水疗中心 店主帖文哭诉“池塘鱼儿死光光”

水獭在阻断措施实施期间,到处趴趴走,不仅到过竹脚妇孺医院去,然而有网民哭诉水獭们“私闯”水疗中心的池塘,杀死了池塘内的所有鱼儿,包括一条养了13年的金龙鱼。 前艺人刘琦周二(5月12日)在脸书帖文,哭诉她设立于碧山公园的水疗中心遭水獭闯入,并捕猎池塘中的鱼儿,大快朵颐。 她在另一个帖文中也悼念池中一条13岁的金龙鱼“阿发”,回忆帖文中写到,这条金龙鱼大约有88公分长。她在回应本地著名谐星梁荣耀留言询问时,确认了“阿发”已死,“阿发挺过了洪水和干旱,却无法逃脱这场大屠杀”。 有关帖文吸引夺命网友留言安慰和打抱不平,然而也有部分网友指出,“水獭是野生动物,谁也不能预料它会去哪里。既然现在水疗中心关闭了,为了避免悲剧重演,或许可以将池塘内的鱼带回家或迁到其他地方饲养”。 据水疗中心脸书帖文显示,该中心将配合阻断措施法令,自4月7日开始关闭到6月1日。而昨日就有人发现Zouk家族最近在碧山-宏茂桥公园出现,和滨海湾家族“争夺领地”,因此谁是杀死水疗中心池中鱼儿的罪魁祸首,就不得而知了。

打包不适任Yes Man进国会 林鼎狠批集选制

人民之声创党人林鼎狠批集选区选举制弊病,把不适任的候选人,和民望较高的资深候选人打包在一起,藉此获选当上国会议员。 林鼎在上周五的脸书贴文,比较我国和英国西敏寺议会制度,指出在英国,即便保守党的后座议员,会把国家前途优先于党的利益,敢于抨击和反抗,该党领袖特蕾莎梅提出的脱欧议程。 在西敏寺制度下,后座议员无政府官职,也不偏反对党,他们坐在下议院的前台(即执政党席位的后座),新加坡的议会制度,也是取材自西敏寺议会范本。 林鼎直言,只有当所有国会议员,在议会表决时把国家利益摆在党利益之前,议会民主才能正常运作。这正是英国保守党后座议员展现的代议士素质! “即使知道他们的行为可能让党失去政权,但选择在国家大义前,放下党派成见。” 讥行动党后座议员成“Yes Man” 他不忘抨击人民行动党后座议员,在议会中只愿当“应声虫”(Yes Man)。结果,整体议会素质灾难性地下降,议会辩论差强人意,议员们糟糕的出席率也落人笑柄。 他说,正是饱受抨击的集选区选举制,把不合格的人选送进国会,才导致今日议会素质崩坏的局面。 为此,他扬言人民之声若得以执政,将废除集选区制度,铲除掉这个议会民主的毒瘤。 在林鼎的另一则贴文,则强调铲除精英主义、落实直接民主的重要。他对教育部长王乙康,认为新加坡必须成为一党制国家才能生存,不敢苟同。…

Suspension of CHAS participation for 10 Access Medical clinics

In a press release on Monday (8 October), the Ministry of Health…