By Ghui

According to news reports, a freelance filmmaker spent close to eight hours at the Singapore police headquarters in connection with her recent interviews with two ex-SMRT bus drivers from China (http://sg.news.yahoo.com/s-pore-film-maker-assists-with-investigation-into-police-brutality-173326960.html). 
 Her iMac, mobile phone and laptop were also similarly seized.

I question the relevance of this search. Lynn Lee is a journalist and a documentary maker. It is her job to conduct interviews with individuals who the public will be interested in. The bus drivers were embroiled in the recent transportation furore and have alleged that the police assaulted them. Given that these men have generated much controversy, which involves two public departments – the transportation services and the police, Singaporeans are naturally curious. (http://ride.asiaone.com/news/transport/story/former-smrt-drivers-allege-police-assault) Added to that very understandable inquisitiveness is the right of all Singaporeans to hear both sides of the story.

Lee’s desire to speak with the bus drivers to get their version of events is therefore in line with her profession and public interest. All the efforts and time spent on seemingly investigating her appears to me to be a waste of police time and public resources. If the police are trying to investigate the allegations of assault, shouldn’t they be speaking to the persons involved directly? I.e. the police officers implicated and the bus drivers themselves! Why question a third party journalist who was not at the “scene of the crime”?

Perhaps the police merely wanted to ascertain that the bus drivers did make these allegations in her presence and wanted to take her statement. But surely, that would not take 8 hours? Besides, why confiscate her mobile phone?

This is not the first time the police have apparently been overzealous. In 2005, they quizzed filmmaker Martyn See on his film about opposition politician, Dr. Chee Soon Juan. They even ordered for his tapes and video camera to be surrendered! (link) Again, what was the point of going after a filmmaker who was just trying to make a documentary on an individual who Singaporeans are intrigued by? Surely, Singaporeans are entitled to hear Dr. Chee’s side of the story?

As a Singaporean, I wonder if the police force (funded by taxpayers) should be spending our resources on these rather pointless exercises?

Surely, the police have better things to do?

You May Also Like

Netizens annoyed with government’s move to stop Mandai Crematorium workers from receiving red packets

Crematorium workers who take red packets from grieving families and funeral directors…

Haw Par Villa to close temporarily from 1 Dec 2018 to 28 Feb 2019 for repair works

Haw Par Villa will be closed temporarily for three months period due…

指莱佛士书院校友聚会未见吴作栋 陈钦亮酸:迷路啦?

今日,职总英康前总裁、2011年新加坡总统候选人陈钦亮以诙谐贴文引起网民注意,嘲讽意味不言而喻,令人会心一笑。 他在个人脸书发了一张照片,指那是莱佛士书院老同学聚会。 “连陈清木也到了,吴作栋也应该来,但他没有。可能他迷路啦。” 本周六(8月3日),新加坡前进党举办党推介礼,该党秘书长抨击,现今政府良好施政精神已渐乖离,三大支柱:透明、独立和问责渐被侵蚀。 但荣誉国务资政吴作栋则在隔日,于脸书点评陈清木,讽喻后者已“迷失方向”,如同“和风车决斗的唐吉柯德”。 吴作栋称和陈清木是莱佛士书院的同班同学,已认识他60年了,很遗憾见到后者“迷失方向”,如同西班牙小说家塞万提斯笔下的唐吉柯德,误把风车当成巨人。 也有些网民在陈钦亮脸书留言,揶揄或许吴作栋不屑出席薪资50万以下的“庸俗百姓”聚会。

Brakeless bicycle to soon be banned on public paths and roads, says Transport Ministry

Singapore will no longer be able to see any brakeless bicycles on…