By Dr Wee Teck Young, M.B.B.S. ( S’pore ), MMed Family Medicine ( S’pore)

It’s hard for me, an ordinary citizen of Singapore, a medical doctor engaged in social enterprise work in Afghanistan and a human being wishing for a better world, to write this from Kabul.

But people are dying.

And children and women are feeling hopeless.

“What’s the point in telling you our stories?” asked Freba, one of the seamstresses working with the Afghan Peace Volunteers to set up a tailoring co-operative for Afghan women. “Does anyone hear? Does anyone believe us?”

Silently within, I answered Freba with shame,” You’re right. No one is listening.”

So, I write this in protest against my government’s presence in the humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan, as a way to lend my voice to Freba and all my Afghan friends.

I do so in dissent, against the global security of imprisoned minds.

I thought, “If no one listens as humans should, we should at least speak like free men and women.”

Singapore’s complicity in the humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan

It is clear that the Taliban, the many Afghan and regional warlords, militia groups and the Afghan government are responsible for the current humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan.

But Singapore is also responsible because it is one of the fifty U.S. /NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) coalition countries working with the corrupt Afghan government ( rated the most corrupt country in 2012 ).

Singapore has inadvertently become a minor accomplice of the self-interests of the U.S. government in Afghanistan ; The U.S. Vice President , Joe Biden, spoke at the Munich Security Conference recently, “The United States is a Pacific power. And the world’s greatest military alliance ( NATO ) helps make us an Atlantic power as well. As our new defense strategy makes clear, we will remain both a Pacific power and an Atlantic power.”

American power and economic interests naturally do not include the best interests of ordinary Singaporeans or Afghans.

The Afghan humanitarian tragedy

In the normal, logical world, it should inspire the doubt and curiosity of Singaporeans that while the U.S. /NATO coalition was spending billions of dollars every week on the Afghan war ( the U.S. alone was spending two billion dollars every week ), Afghans have been perishing under one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates in the world. At least 36% live below the poverty line and 35% of Afghan men do not have work . The UN calls the acute malnutrition of nearly one million children in the Afghan south ‘shocking’ . Almost three quarters of all Afghans do not have access to safe drinking water .

On several occasions in the past few years, Afghanistan was declared the worst country for children and women, and yet, many of us still hold this warped presumption, “Afghanistan is the worst country for children and women but whatever we are doing over there MUST somehow be right!”

The Afghan war tragedy

In the normal, logical world, it should at least matter to ‘result-orientated’ Singaporeans that the very expensive Afghan/U.S. coalition’s ‘war against terrorism’ has increased rather than decreased ‘terrorism’, with the Global Terrorism Index reporting that terrorist strikes in the region have increased four times since the start of the Iraq war in 2003.

Even President Karzai said in the UK recently that the security situation in southern Helmand province of Afghanistan was better before British troops were deployed.

Adding to this cynical mess of increased ‘terrorism’ at the hands of global superpowers, the U.S. has established an epicenter of drone warfare in Afghanistan, with Afghans and Pakistanis and other ‘insurgents’ as their ‘targets’, and Singapore as one of their many allies. Singapore has had teams helping in drone reconnaissance operations, reconnaissance that may have eventually ended up with a U.S. /NATO decision to kill someone without trial.

I had raised this personal concern once in a meeting room at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs ; I was appreciative of the attentiveness given to this issue, but sensed that there was no great interest in ‘investigating’ how Singapore’s co-operation in the drone operations in Afghanistan may be violating international law, as was suggested by the ex-UN Special Rapporteur on Extra Judicial, Summary or Arbitrary Killings, Mr Philip Alston.

A recent New York Times article highlights these ‘fears  for U.S. allies’, reporting on a lawsuit in the British courts that ‘accuses British officials of becoming “secondary parties to murder” by passing intelligence to American officials that was later used in drone strikes.’ My life has been changed by listening to Afghan friends like Raz Mohammad tell how ‘drones bury beautiful lives’.

Raz Mohammad, Abdulhai and I in Kabul, Afghanistan
Raz Mohammad, Abdulhai and I in Kabul, Afghanistan

The U.N. is finally living up to its charter to ‘remove the scourge of war’ by duly investigating  drone warfare. Major U.S. newspapers are also asking for more transparency over Obama’s weekly, premeditated ‘kill lists’. There has been concern over unchecked Powers getting even more out of all jurisdictions with the appointment of ‘drone justifier’ John Brennan as Obama’s CIA Director nominee.

Even the UN Committee on the Rights of a Child has been “alarmed” at reports of the deaths of hundreds of children from US attacks and air strikes in Afghanistan since the committee last reviewed U.S. practices in 2008.

Singapore should be alarmed too.

Singapore’s own identity as a militarized, authoritarian country

Deep within, like most human beings, Freba yearns for a decent livelihood without war. Abdulhai and the Afghan Peace Volunteers wish for friends from all 195 countries of the world, a better world without borders!

What kind of identity do Singaporeans wish for their country, a peaceful and friendly country or otherwise?

Again, I’m concerned. We like pictures of be-medaled soldiers more than unsung ‘Mother Teresa’ heroines. Our government has a significant number of ex-military commanders.

According to the Global Militarisation Index released by the Bonn International Centre for Conversion (BICC), Singapore has been the second most militarized nation in the world for years. The latest ranking puts Singapore just second to Israel and one brutal position more militarized than Syria.

What also worries me is that this militarized mindset may be behind Singapore’s enthusiasm in the drone show-business, and in ‘unintentionally’ being part of the U.S.’ ‘Asia pivot’ by hosting four U.S. littoral combat ships.

Even on the economic front, while Singapore has one of the higher Gini coefficients of income inequality in the world, not many people in Singapore are aware of or debating Singapore’s participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership , again a partnership that corporate America is pushing for.

What Singapore has aligned herself with in Afghanistan is militarized authoritarianism that concentrates profit and power in the hands of a few. While this follows global norms, such a system works mainly for the wealth and power of the 1% in the short term, but not for the daily needs of the 99% in either the short or long term.

I personally think that both the democratic and socialist practices of today are ‘non-progressive’ vehicles for the rule of the few ‘Kings, Emperors, Presidents, and Prime Ministers’ over the many presumably ‘ignorant, helpless and sometimes lazy’ subjects. These elitist systems tend to maintain control by ‘pacifying the masses’ through formal education, mainstream media and force.

I hope Singapore can steer itself away from this ‘norm’, an ugly ‘norm’ in which war becomes fun, like when Prince Harry described his combat pilot job in Afghanistan as “a joy … because I’m one of those people who loves playing PlayStation and Xbox, so with my thumbs I like to think I’m probably quite useful.”

I believe that for effective defense and genuine security, we ought to be friends with neighbours and all peoples of other lands rather than militarists with superior weapons.

Perhaps these are differences in opinions which can be included in Our Singapore Conversation.

It’s hard for me to write this, but I am sincerely ashamed to be a citizen of the 2nd most militarized nation on earth, a country that has participated in the legally-questionable drone warfare in Afghanistan.

Thankfully, I have hope in Singaporeans like I have hope in humanity. There are alternatives. The world is awakening, the human race is revolutionizing, and so is Singapore’s electorate. Most ordinary folk in the world don’t want to send missiles or guns to kill strangers in other places! Human beings have always preferred otherwise.

My voice is not political. My voice is human.

Afghans are hurting very badly.

And I am hurting too.

 

You May Also Like

迪哥达被控刑事诽谤 11月从宪法角度辩护

因为在一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,曾在去年12月和本社总编许渊臣一同被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),将针对其指控作出宪法挑战(constitutional challenge)。 国家法庭将在11月27日早上9时30分聆讯其申诉。 迪哥达代表律师拉维在脸书发文透露,前者指示他从宪法角度作出辩护。 “我们将质询,在刑事法典499条下“有关人士之声誉”,依据2017年上诉庭判例,只能诠释作为“自然人”(natural persons only”),那么,文章所指的“内阁”,就不能视为任何意义上的“个人”,也和新加坡宪法23和24条一致。” 宪法第23条阐述行政机构性质;24条则关乎内阁的组成。 法庭也会审讯探讨,究竟被告的文章是否损害内阁声誉;是内阁作为一个整体,仰或是内阁个人声誉受损?如把内阁视为一个整体,那么检方需要阐释,内阁是否可能成为刑事诽谤的受害者。 去年9月18日,资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),援引《广播法》第16(1)项,要求本社在六小时内撤下被指违规的贴文,本社已遵照该局的指示删除贴文。…

狮城外籍PMET人数逐年增长

在上周,人力部公布了外籍劳动力人数。从数据显示,持有就业准证(EP)的外籍专业人士、经理、执行人员及技师(PMET),虽然人数过去两年从19万2300下跌至18万5800人。不过,总体持S准证和就业准证的外籍PMET人数,过去六年来实则呈增长之势。 2013 33万6,000 2014 34万9,000 2015 36万6,500 2016 37万2,000 2017 37万2,100 2018 38万1,300 在去年底,持S准证和就业准证的外籍PMET人数,就达到了38万1300人。(如图下) S准证外籍PMET两年内飙升1.1万人 2017年至2018年,虽然持就业准证的外籍PMET人数减少1900人。但是,持S准证的PMET实则飙升至1万1100人,人数达到19万5500人,创六年来历史新高。 S准证针对有技术或中等技术/专业人士发放。 S准证客工增多的原因,很可能是因为聘请S准证客工最低薪资条件是2千300元,但要聘请就业准证客工,薪资条件则必须至少3千600元。…

入侵数据库者不只一人 80万捐血者资料或外泄

3月中被揭发的血库数据网安疏漏事故,被发现储存捐血者数据的服务器,并不只被原先的网安专家入侵,而是还有其他入侵者,因此捐血者资料有可能外泄。 网络服务商 Secur Solutions Group(简称SSG)为卫生科学局服务,开发一个包含80万8201名捐血者登记资料的数据库,和管理血库的网络注册、预约和反馈系统。 但是,当局在15日接获一名美国网安专家举报,指该储存捐血者资料的数据库与互联网连接,即刻切断有关的链接,并展开调查。 原先的初步调查显示,只有该名网安专家登入服务器,而网安专家也承诺会把数据删除。 但根据卫生科学局的文告,随后的取证分析显示,自去年10月22日至今年的3月13日期间,有关服务器已经被数个互联网协议(简称IP)登入。因此,SSG不排除捐血者资料,可能已外泄。 SSG约在去年10月,将捐血者注册资料,包括姓名、身份证号码、性别、捐血次数、最近三次的捐血日期上载到服务器。有的捐血者资料还包括了血性、身高和体重。 虽然,SSG曾于今年1月4日接到卫生科学局的要求,提供额外数据,但是有关的数据并没有上载到服务器。 暂不对SSG采取行动 SSG公司就此事向受影响的捐血者致歉,惟强调数据库内没有敏感的医疗信息或联络资料,并表示会继续调查此次事件,也配合警方和卫生科学局的调查。…

PAP Supporter: It is the parents and not MOE who inflicted shame on child

In the recent saga of Ministry of Education (MOE) hitting back at…