Mrs Joan Fong (daughter of the late Hon Sui Sen), clarifies that she was not the Joan Hon who wrote that George Yeo is not suitable to be elected president.

We want to thank Mrs Fong for engaging our readers on TOC and clarifying that she was not the Joan Hon who posted the earlier comments. TOC’s moderation policy is clearly spelt out HERE.

We present here in full, the three comments Joan Hon posted on our article, “Tan Cheng Bock vs George Yeo for president?

—comment 1—

I know both Tan Cheng Bock and George Yeo. It is a hard choice. For me, choosing one is an insult to the other.

I would like to highlight the fact that an email making its rounds carry three letters supposedly from this thread.

One is from Jenny Hu, whose name I checked didn’t appear on June 4 on this thread. The other from Jane Ho differs in content from what Jane Ho wrote.

The third letter carries my name. I did not write it at all. It is insulting to George if I said all those things. I was his GP and Physics teacher. He was one of the students that would cause me to beam with pride.

I once met him at his mother’s wake and told him I was campaigning against X-rated films. I had actually forgotten he was the Minister in charge of it. This was the honest truth. He probably thought I was insensitive enough to go to his mother’s wake to petition him.

After that I dropped the idea of getting a lot of signatures to support my intention. A year or so passed and one of my sisters reported that George said to her, “You sister is causing me a lot of trouble.” I had to tell him, this time at his father’s wake, that I had nothing to do with the flood of letters he received on the matter. Other people were campaigning too.

He and Jennifer, his wife, came to my Uncle Louis Hon’s wake. Jennifer shared a lot of her life and views with us. I’ve been to their house for two meetings regarding an event we were planning for the Museum.

As for Tan Cheng Bock, he was part of a large bunch of us sharing our teen years together. Full of stories. He is not an intellectual like George. But he is a medical doctor.

A stickler for everything good and true. As a scoutmaster, he had once snatched the axe from a boy scout who was about to chop down a coconut tree. When a police car swung onto the scene, and there, in the spotlight of the car’s headlights, was Tan Cheng Bock caught with an axe in his hand in a stance like he was the one about to chop down the tree.

[Bock if you are reading this, I think you were a scream on that occasion. Bet you can’t remember this. That was so long ago. Nowadays, if you try to right a wrong, people will come and condemn you wrongly. That’s life.]

—comment 2—

Here are the three letters making its rounds. This should teach all of us that you cannot believe all you read and there are people filled with hatred making mischief.

————————————————————–

From Jane Ho 4 June 2011 on TOC

George Yeo’s ostensible caring for his supporters by ‘listening’ to them and thereby wanting to run for President is all sham. To say he is connected to the people is not to know the man. GY is a brilliant intellectual, a philosopher and an eloquent speaker. But unfortunately, like many intellectuals of his ilk, he is too aloof, too brainy and polished to really resonate with the ground or grass roots. The PAP will tell you as much about GY’s intellectual prowess and the lofty pinnacle he dominates. As such, his connectivity with the people are with the smart, polished crowd. That’s why he is such a good foreign minister. He is in his element, in the same class with these foreign elites.

GY is also not effectively bilingual, despite years of learning Mandarin; his dialect skills are also passable at best.
Sure, GY is connected to the people. If by people, you mean the high brow, sophisticated English speaking crowd. But with the Ah Kows, Ah Tus, Ah Bengs, not a chance.

As for his being independent of the PAP, that is more hogwash. He was an SAF scholar, rode the government gravy train to a meteoric ascent within the PAP hierarchy. This type of conditioning simply cannot produce a courageous and fiercely independent spirit.

D’ont be duped by GY’s sly sophistry. My choice would be Catherine Lim.

(TOC’s Note: We could not find this comment anywhere on our website)
——————————————————————–

I STRESS AGAIN. I DIDN’T WRITE THIS!

JOAN HON

—comment 3—

See how I appear as a Christian? How devilishly cunning.

Whoever wrote this, God will get you for this.

George, I am praying for you, sincerely. And it had stayed in my mind that if you are out of politics, God has better plans for you elsewhere.

It might be the presidency and it might not be too. But it has to be where the family will be the happiest. They are what should matter most in your life.

And I am sure you know that the president’s life is not everyone’s cup of tea. Devan Nair suffered isolation. For a man who is a “people person” to be shut away is not what he wants.

“You must find it like a cage,” I told him, when he described to me how wonderful it was at his visit to Spain. The security officer wasn’t hanging around him like a ball and chain.

“That’s it!” he said, “You’ve got it right. It is a cage.”

He tried to invite Jeyaretnam and Chiam See Tong for a meal at the Istana. The powers that be disapproved.

When he had committed his indiscretion and was removed from office, I sent him a letter saying enthusiastically, “Welcome back to the human race!” I also added that while this moment was ignominous, people forget easily. He will always have his friends. [Albert Winsemius was one of them. One of the things we used to ask each other was, “I wonder where’s Devan Nair.”]

Devan Nair wrote a note back to me saying that my letter made his day. He was so drugged at the hospital, he wrote, that he couldn’t write a better reply.

They asked around who would be president. My father was asked and replied no thanks. At least four other people were approached privately.

When Wee Kim Wee consented, he was clever to lay down one condition. That was he could entertain anyone he liked at the Istana. Which was what he did. My mother was part of a gaggle of old ladies who went there for afternoon tea, hosted by Mrs Wee. Puan Noor Aishah, widow of President Yusof Ishak, was one of them.

I’m trying to warn you, George, if you are a free spirit, don’t take on the presidency. It might cramp your style.
On the other hand, you don’t have to stay there for ever. There are terms of office that might tie you down only for some years.

I don’t know why I am writing this here. It should go into your Facebook Notes.

Best wishes,

Mrs Joan Fong

Further to this, in her Facebook entry titled “I vote for George Yeo as President. He was my student“, Mrs Fong says:

“Joan is hopping mad that there is a critical statement about George Yeo running for president that is supposedly written by me !!! Such rubbish! I never wrote a single word of this thing. Accompanying it were two other critical letters from a Jenny Hu and Jane Ho. All dated “4 June 11 at TOC” whatever that means.

I tell you all, behold! The lengths people go to, to do personal bashing of anyone and anything they don’t like. Someone invented ALL THREE LETTERS!

From now on, don’t believe anything you read. The elections are over. You want to complain, hit out at a policy, not at a person. Just think of all the bull— going around. This person admires Catherine Lim. I presume since she fires verbal flaming arrows at people, her admirers are also in the same mould.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【政治】余振忠挑战吴资政的“稳定器论”

早前,我国前总理、荣誉国务资政吴作栋在接受《海峡时报》专访时,提及推行集选区制、设立由议员管理的市镇理事会制度,成为我国政治体制的“稳定器”。 事实上这不是吴作栋发表集选区作为“稳定器”的论述。回溯2019年5月,他接手《联合早报》访问时也曾这么说: 要拥有这样的政治景观,是否需要改变我们现有的机制?我觉得应该不需要。我们已经竭尽所能去稳定机制。集选区、官委议员等等都可被称作“稳定器”。就是说,你可以有人选的更替,但是制度不会翻船。所以我不认为接下来20年需要改变。我不知道还有什么未可预见,但目前来看,无须改变。 对此,前非选区议员余振忠则形容,让在野党也管理市镇会是可以的,能够证明在野党也能管理好社区,以及让在野党议员解决居民的需求。 至于集选区制度,原本是为了确保有少数族群代表而设立,但后来集选区规模变得越来越大,理由是透过规模经济来确保管理市镇会的效益。 除了杰利蝾螈(gerrymandering)现象(不公的选区划分)以外,集选区制度的一些方面是好的。但同样这对于执政党来说也是把双刃剑,当在野党的团队比行动党更强大,集选区反而成了在野党的堡垒区,行动党很难夺回。 不过,余振忠也提及他对过去发生AIM公司事件的失望。 行动党在1991年成立AIM(Action Information Management)公司,来支援市镇会的电脑技术管理。但2011年大选后,AIM却致函工人党市镇会主席林瑞莲,有意终结服务。 在2011年,工人党接管的阿裕尼-后港市镇会。除了遭CPG 管理代理公司终止服务,同时,上述AIM公司也要求终止对工人党市镇会的电脑系统服务,致使该市镇会须在两个月内,开发自己的电脑管理系统,确保服务不中断。…

Developmental paediatrician raises some keen questions about the educational policies on bilingualism

Bilingualism will allow Singaporeans to access valuable economic opportunities around the region,…

【冠状病毒19】欲赴中国请注意 乘客需提前获检测呈阴性证明

为了降低跨国疫情传染风险,中国要求来自新加坡或在新加坡转机飞往中国的乘客,必须在登机前五天获得冠状病毒19检测呈阴性结果的证明。 中国驻我国大使馆今天(8月21日)在官网发通告指出,自8月28日下周五开始,凡是自我国出发及在我国转机到新加坡的中国籍和外籍乘客,都必须在登机前五天,提交核酸检测阴性证明给当局,申领带“HS”标志的绿色健康码或健康状况声明书。 航空公司也必须在乘客登机前,查检绿色健康码或健康状况声明书,而乘客也受促携带核酸检测阴性证明。 基于大使馆并未指明特定的检测机构,乘客可选择在我国卫生部网站所列出的任何医院或诊所进行核酸检测,而中国当局也只接受核酸检测结果。 通告中,当局也提供了申领健康码的方法,即在取得核酸检测阴性证明后的24小时之内,将该证明及姓名、护照号码、检测时间、检测机构等信息通过防疫健康码国际版微信小程序,进行申请。在中国大使馆核实后,申请的乘客就会获得绿色健康码。 而外国游客则必须在乎的核酸检测阴性证明后,将有效的护照资料页main、检测证明和已附上申请人签名的健康状况申明书扫描后,电邮到大使馆的指定电子邮箱([email protected])。电邮的标题必须为“HS+姓名+出发日期(年/月/日)”。 大使馆也提醒转机的民众,目前我国暂不允许乘客转机到中国内地,机场内中转区也不具备任何核酸检测设施,因此请乘客们在购票时,和承运航空确认有关航程的可行性。若航空公司确认可行,乘客才在始发地获得绿色健康码或健康状况声明书,并在有关期限内进行转机,避免蒙受经济损失或滞留问题。 当局表示,绿色健康码的有效期是以检测证明出具日起开始计算,因此促请中国籍乘客提前,适当地安排核酸检测时间,并且结果出炉立刻上传到微信账号,避免在登记当天或前一天才上传。

Two women charged with murder of their Myanmar helper

A mother and her daughter have been charged with the murder of their domestic…