Andrew Loh

If one were to follow – and believe – what the Labour Chief and the Manpower Ministry say, one would be inclined to think that the unemployment situation here in Singapore is “not as bad as feared”, as one Straits Times report put it.

In the past few months, the picture painted was, at the very least, a hopeful one. Indeed, Ministers have been consistent in asking Singaporeans to be positive. Labour Chief Lim Swee Say, in particular, has been trumpeting the so-called “tripartite” relationship between the government, the unions and employers. “In Singapore we have tripartism, and the tripartism has served us very well,” he said in January this year. “It is a unique advantage, so as we go through this downturn, our challenge is to continue to unleash this unique Singapore advantage.” (Source)

It seems that even “unleashing this unique Singapore advantage” has not stopped the tide of retrenchments. Three months after Mr Lim made that statement, the Today paper reported that unemployment in Singapore had reached record levels not seen in six years.

Total redundancies hit 12,600 in the first quarter — a 34-per-cent increase from the fourth quarter last year. Among the resident labour force, unemployment reached a five-year high of 4.8 per cent in March, sharply up from December’s 3.6 per cent. (Source)

And as if to choke on his own words, Mr Lim was reported to have said, on the same day the Today report came out, that, “It is not a question of whether we will see a second wave of retrenchment, but a question of when it will reach the peak, how high the peak will be, how long it will last, and how many more workers will lose their jobs in this next wave.” (ST, 29 April, 2009)

So much for the “unique Singapore advantage”. It seems that the NTUC Chief is just sitting tight and waiting for retrenchments to peak. In the meantime, the situation continues to deteriorate. Headlines such as, “Jobless pool shrinks”, “Jobless rate hits 4.8%”, “Expect more layoffs …” provides proof of the dire situation.

Yet, in the midst of all these, one thing is conspicuously absent – any talk of protecting the average Singaporean worker. The only solutions the government and the union seem to have is to one, plead with employers not to retrench workers and two, to continue the “reskilling, upskilling and multi-skilling” of workers. (Source)

The Singaporean worker, thus, is at the complete mercy of his employer. Anecdotal evidence points to discriminatory practices such as age, language and even gender discrimination by employers, together with employers’ preference for hiring foreigners even for jobs which Singaporeans can do.

The government’s response, which seems to miss the point, is to insist that Singapore needs foreigners. Singaporeans understand that the country needs foreigners. Their concern is whether we are opening the door too wide to foreigners of every ilk, even for jobs which Singaporeans can perform in. The government, however, seem to not want to address this.

The Prime Minister, in his May Day message, was reported to have said:

“In hard times Singaporeans think the non-Singaporeans are taking their jobs away from them,” said Mr Lee. However, he said this is a mistaken view because without non-Singaporeans working alongside Singaporeans, the jobs may not be there in the first place, citing the integrated resorts as an example. (Source)

Be that as it may, the Singaporean worker needs more protection from the government. It is unthinkable that while foreigners are let in by the hundreds of thousands, Singaporeans are left to their own devices – with the unions taking the sides of the employers and doing nothing to speak up for or fight for the rights of Singaporeans. Witness the feeble response of the Labour Chief to the retrenchment by DBS of 900 workers in November 2008. (Source)

It is with this in mind – protecting the Singaporean worker – that the event in Hong Lim Park this Saturday was conceptualized by five Singaporeans, including this writer.

Please come support the event and show support for the Singaporean worker.

It is time that we demanded the government do more for the Singaporean who’ve worked hard and slogged for long hours all these years.

Perhaps the Labour and the Manpower chiefs should start thinking about “unleashing the unique Singapore advantage” to protect our workers instead of engaging in meaningless rhetoric and semantics.

——

Read also Ravi Philemon’s blog entry, “A webchat with Mr Gan Kim Yong and Amy Khor“. Ravi will also be one of the speakers at Hong Lim Park this Saturday (9 May at 5pm).

—–

Support the Singaporean worker!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

”仍为时尚早“ 傅丽珊:若能获委议员必全力以赴

坊间早前揣测,前空军中队指挥官、樟宜机场集团第五航空楼策划组副总裁傅丽珊,有可能“披白衣”上阵来届大选,对此傅丽珊本人面对媒体询问,“如果可以和居民更深接触,可以做这里的议员,我会全力以赴,但现在还为时过早。” 她表示,目前谈及此事仍为时过早,目前她只是专注把工作做好。 昨日早上,2000多名三巴旺居民,参加了区内的首届妇女节。出席者包括跌伤刚康复的交通部长许文远、教育部长王乙康等选区议员。 44岁的傅丽珊,也是人民行动党三巴旺支部副主席,她负责筹划此次的妇女节活动。 她也告知媒体,目前每周都到接见选民活动帮忙,并参与家访。她认为,一些女性选民可能更愿意和女性议员分享讨论相关妇女课题。 在本月初(11日),傅丽珊接受《联合早报》专访报导,当时他也针对媒体追问,指出“基层服务很有意义,让我很有满足感,如果我的确能担起议员责任,我会全力以赴。” 她说,现今新加坡在教育、就业机会等方面的性别平等上做得很好,且女性在政府、商业领域扮演领导角色获认同,惟还可以做得更好,例如让女性在政治领域有更多领导机会。 她也形容,自己的职涯的确“较不寻常”,她抓住每一个机会,也鼓励大家这么做。 她认同行动党妇女团主席杨莉明的观点,即鼓励更多女性投身政坛,更积极投身为家国服务,“我们需要更多女性加入我们的团队,女性领导团结力量更大。” 从目前迹象显示,傅丽珊正积极在基层间走动提高曝光率,也极有可能代表行动党,在许文远的选区出战。 空军出身   曾任纳丹总统女副官…

Grab driver offers disabled man a cheaper fare, urges other drivers to help him

A Grab driver that goes by the name Melvin Poh shared a…

53-yr-old driver charged for causing death through his rash action at AYE

Singapore Police Force (SPF) has announced that the Traffic police has charged…

Newsbites – stress, beer and babies (not what you think)

Young professional getting stressed Media today reported that more young professionals are…