A former auxiliary police officer from Certis Cisco, who fired his revolver in a game akin to Russian roulette, was convicted of committing a rash act endangering human life on Tuesday (24 January).
Lai was also convicted of intentionally obstructing the course of justice and lying to the police. He confessed five days after failing a lie detector test.
On 13 August 2015, Gregory Lai Kar Jun and his colleague Muhammad Dzul Adhar Azmi were at an observation point at the Checkpoint.
At that moment, Lai took out his revolver to play a game similar to Russian roulette.
Lai took four out of five bullets of his gun and spun the chamber. He pressed the trigger once, but nothing happened. The second time, the bullet fired. After that, Lai immediately put the four remaining bullets to the chamber.
Lai found the used bullet and told Dzul his idea, which Dzul agreed, to put a bullet in a toilet bowl and claim he had lost two bullets while using the toilet.
Lai then hid the used bullet in a traffic wand and went to the portable toilet where he disposed of a different bullet in the toilet bowl. Later, he reported the matter to the operations room.
While, Dzul retrieved the used bullet from the traffic wand and placed it in his cigarette box, which he threw into the Bedok Reservoir at around 2 am the next day.
Police officers conducted their investigation and tried to look for the bullet at around 8.50pm that day, in which Dzul and Lai also took part in the search.
District Judge Hamidah Ibrahim stated that a revolver, loaded with a live bullet, is not a toy.
“The bullet could have ricocheted anywhere within the room. It was purely fortuitous that nothing happened to (his colleague),” she added.
She also said that Lai must have been fully aware that squeezing the trigger of a loaded gun with another person in very close proximity was a highly risky act that puts a human life in danger.
While, Dzul had been convicted for committing a rash act and was sentenced to three weeks imprisonment and fined $2,000 or one week’s jail in default for failing to report the case to the Police.
As for Lai, he faces up to six months’ jail and a fine for a rash act endangering human life. He also faces up to seven years’ jail and a fine for obstructing the course of justice, and up to a year’s jail and a fine for lying to the police.
He will be sentenced on 9 February.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

19-yr-old Malaysian youth to be caned lightly seven times in open court for beating and burning stray dog

A Malaysian Chinese youth who abused and set fire to a stray dog last month, will be caned lightly seven times in open court as part of his punishment. The 19-year-old youth, Braden Yap Hong Sheng, was charged with animal cruelty for causing undue pain to a brown female dog in front of premises at Jalan Impian Emas 22, Taman Impian Emas, Skudai, at 1.49 am on 27 March. Yap pleaded guilty to the charge in the Johor Bahru Sessions Court last week. On Tuesday (18 Apr), Sessions Judge Datuk Che Wan Zaidi Che Wan Ibrahim delivered the verdict to cane Yap lightly seven times, and added that Yap should be placed on a one-year good behavior bond with a surety of RM10,000 (approx. 2,255 USD) for his offense. The light caning on Yap will be held in open court at 9am on 21 May.

No Innocent Explanation? – Death Row Inmate’s Lawyers use Evidence Adduced by the Prosecution to Seek Inmate’s Second Acquittal

By Ariffin Sha In a twist of Shakespearean proportions,  Mr Eugene Thuraisingam,…

Singapore hangs 14th drug convict since last year

Singapore executed Mohd Aziz bin Hussain, convicted of drug trafficking, amid a resumption of executions in 2022. Another woman prisoner, Saridewi Djamani, faces execution. Amnesty International urged Singapore to halt the executions, questioning the deterrent effect of the death penalty.

District Judge says prosecution’s submission on Karl Liew’s sentencing reads like mitigation

Karl Liew, the son of former Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong, was sentenced to two weeks in jail for providing false evidence during the trial of Ms Parti Liyani, a migrant domestic worker who was initially convicted of stealing items worth S$50,856 belonging to Liew Mun Leong and his family — out of which S$46,856 worth of items were declared to have been stolen by Karl. Karl was charged for falsely claiming that two pieces of clothing found in Parti’s possession belonged to him and making a false statement to a police officer that he had discovered 119 pieces of clothing belonging to him in boxes packed by Parti. DJ Teo noted that his judgement would be limited to the two charges bought before him as the prosecution has focused only on a small segment of Karl’s testimony at the hearing in State Court and charged Karl Liew for having knowingly offered up false evidence in court in respect of that small segment. The sentencing judge noted that Karl’s false testimony could have resulted in a wrongful conviction of Parti and emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of the justice system. The judge also observed that the prosecution’s submission read like mitigation for the accused, which the defense copied wholesale. The prosecution had sought the maximum fine of S$5,000, but the judge ruled that imprisonment was necessary for such cases. With remission, Karl is expected to serve nine days out of the two weeks in jail.