casey2
The employer of Mr Anton Casey, whose Facebook postings have caused outrage among Singaporeans (and others), has said that Casey’s comments “were made in poor taste.”
Mr Casey’s firm Crossinvest Asia is investigating his comments and is set to take “appropriate action” once the review is completed, British newspaper, The Independent reported.
In a statement, Managing director Christophe Audergon said: “Crossinvest does not condone the comments. We believe they were made in poor taste.”
Casey’s comments mocked “poor people” who took the train, ridiculed S’pore’s public transport system, and called a taxi driver a “retard”, in a series of abusive remarks online.
Casey had posted, on his Facebook page, a picture of his son sitting on a train with the caption: “Daddy, where is your car and who are all these poor people?”
Another photo shows his son in Casey’s Porsche, with an equally offensive caption: “Ahhhh reunited with my baby. Normal service can resume, once I have washed the stench of public transport off me.”
Facing the backlash from his insults, Casey tendered an apology.
“I deeply regret having offended and disrespected the people of Singapore,” he said. “I have the highest respect and regard for Singapore and the good people of Singapore; this is my home.”
Casey, who is married to a former Miss Singapore, claimed that there was a “security breach” of his Facebook page and that an old video of his which had surfaced was “misused”.
“I don’t mean to offend anyone,” he said in that video. “Don’t be angry at me. Be angry with your mum and dad for raising you a wuss.”
However, Casey said that the video was made earlier and was not a response to the public backlash. He said: “It must be made extremely clear that a YouTube video of me, with my son in the background, was not posted in response to any recent events. This video was made weeks prior and has been misused to portray me as unrepentant.”
He said that his family, especially his son, “suffered extreme emotional and verbal abuse online”.
Casey, who is believed to live in Singapore’s posh Sentosa Cove on Sentosa island, also said that he has received death threats following the posting.
Nonetheless, he said:
casey 5“I wish for nothing more than to be forgiven for my poor judgement and given a second chance to rebuild the trust people have had in me as a resident of this wonderful country.”
However, the outrage has not abated, and reaction from the public online continues to criticise his behaviour.
A police report by a member of the public is believed to have been lodged against Casey for his posting.
In his statement, Auderon also said, “Crossinvest has clear policies regarding the codes of conduct expected of its employees. That code of conduct extends to social media. We are currently investigating the comments made by our employee and will take appropriate action once we are in possession of all the facts.”
Singapore’s Law Minister, K Shanmugam, has given his views on the matter. Posting on his Facebook page, Shanmugam said:

“I have been asked what I thought of Mr Anton Casey and his statements. Like many Singaporeans, I am terribly upset and offended by what he has posted. Deeply offensive, wrong, and unacceptable.
“Those who have done well in life should always be looking out for others – especially the less well-off or needy. It is basic human decency. Instead Mr Casey showed contempt. Having money and a Porsche, does not automatically mean that one is superior. Character is important.
“I am glad the community has come together to condemn what he has said.
“He has attempted to apologise to Singaporeans. But some feel that the manner of his apology showed a lack of sincerity. And I think there is some basis for thinking that.
“At the same time, I hope that Singaporeans will not attack or flame his family because of his actions. We, Singaporeans, can be bigger than that.”

The British press has picked up on the story. You can read them here:
The Independent: Singapore after mocking “poor people” calling a taxi driver a “retard”
The Telegraph: British businessman receives death threats in Singapore over Facebook comments
The Guardian: British banker receives death threats for anti-Singapore diatribe
Daily Mail: British banker: I need to wash off the stench of public transport used by the poor

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

More graduates = higher HDB prices?

Why does the govt not reveal relevant statistics? Leong Sze Hian.

Turkmenistan bans the word ‘coronavirus’, arrests those who publicly discuss the pandemic

Turkmenistan’s government has banned the use of the word ‘coronavirus’, and those…

Netizens call out SIA’s higher management for earning “fat pay cheques” after the airline reported net loss of S$142 million in Q3 2020

Singapore Airlines (SIA) Group reported a net loss of S$142 million in…

“食物过敏可致命” 网民吁餐饮业者关注

本月17日,一名脸书用户张贴贴文,分享自己的可怕经历:在餐厅用餐,误食引起过敏食物而导致不适,被送入急诊部。他感叹民众对食物过敏的危害醒觉不高,呼吁餐饮业者在准备餐点时,对顾客的特别需求应更加敏感。 网民Huijin Jinnie说,她日前在裕廊坊购物中心的三盅两件餐厅和家人用餐,已特别提醒侍应,自己对海鲜过敏,不要在餐点中加入海鲜。 “我们点了三蛋菜,也再三确认向服务员确认没有海鲜。但是,我在吃了几口后,就感觉怪异,发现有疑似扇贝的碎片,我询问服务员,但他坚称这只是蛋碎。” 已再三提醒不加海鲜 这时,Huijin已感到很不舒服,皮肤瘙痒,眼睛开始红肿,“我再询问另一服务员,却没人理会。直到第四次,服务员才同意代为向厨房询问,得到的答案是他们只是放了一点扇贝而已。” 然而,这时Huijin 的心跳加速,她的母亲只好马上带她去找附近的综合诊所,但情况未好转,只得送入黄廷芳医院急诊部打点滴。 Huijin说,这已不是她第一次在餐厅或小贩中心用餐,因误食海鲜导致遇到食物过敏。她说她的现况已属幸运,有者因为误食致敏食物而丧失性命。 “我们普遍对食物过敏问题缺乏了解,特别是餐饮业者对这类顾客若缺乏敏感,都可能威胁性命安全。“ 餐厅关切顾客健康 三盅两件餐厅管理层在得知Huijin的情况,也非常关切,马上联系其父母并给与必要的协助。…