Leong Sze Hian

What has record HDB prices got to do with falling private property prices and the number of students graduating from tertiary institutions?

According to the article, “HDB prices hit record high” (Today, Jul 24), prices of HDB flats rose 1.4 per cent in the second quarter. Sales of HDB resale flats also surged 58 per cent, reflecting improved market sentiment, the report said.

Resale transactions were 10,184 in the second quarter, compared to 6,446 in the first quarter.

In contrast, “private home prices fell 4.7 per cent in the second quarter. It’s the 4th straight quarter decline but it is less than the 14.1 per cent sharp drop in the first quarter. (“Home prices dip 4.7%”, ST, Jul 24).

Historically, HDB and private property prices have more or less moved in close tandem with each other, most of the time. So, why are they moving in opposite direction now?

Well, the answer may lie in an altogether seemingly unrelated statistic – the number of graduates.

This year’s graduating cohort from the Nanyang Technological University – 8,000 students – is the largest ever (“8,000 students graduate from NTU this year“, CNA, Jul 23).

I estimate the total number of under-graduate and post-graduate students graduating in a year from all the universities and polytechnics to be about 40,000.

The admissions policy of the tertiary institutions reserves 20 per cent of first year admissions for foreigners. The balance 80 per cent goes to Singaporeans and PRs. I estimate that about 15 per cent go to PRs. So, the percentage for Singaporeans is probably about 65 per cent.

For graduate students, I estimate about 50 per cent are foreigners, and 15 per cent PRs. So, Singaporean graduate students make up probably about 35 per cent.

Some Singaporeans will leave the universities in their second year or later years for foreign universities, whereas probably very few foreigners leave for the basic reason that most foreigners are here on a tuition grant scheme, whereby they have to be bonded to work in Singapore for three years after graduation, and thus are financially less in a position to transfer to foreign universities compared to Singaporeans.

What this means in totality is that about 40 per cent of the entire student population are probably non-Singaporeans.

Since a foreign student on a tuition grant scheme is bonded to work for three years after graduation, he or she may soon become a PR, and eventually a citizen.

For housing, perhaps it makes more economic sense for him or her to buy a HDB flat instead of renting.

For example, renting just a room is about $450 to $650 per month, compared to a monthly repayment of only $400 for every $100,000 of a HDB concessionary loan for 30 years at 2.6 per cent.

So, PRs may try to marry a Singaporean quickly so that they can qualify for a new HDB flat with a HDB loan, or convert their bank loan to a HDB loan when they become citizens.

Of course, PRs with PR siblings, as well as married PRs, can also buy HDB resale flats with bank loans.

What all these mean may be that the demand for HDB flats and thus prices may go up.

Since HDB uses its “market subsidy” pricing policy to peg new HDB flat prices to resale prices, although nobody knows exactly what pricing formula is used, new HDB flat prices may consequently rise as well.

When the decision was made many years ago to have the “20% foreign students” policy, was any comprehensive study done on its implications on the demand and affordability of HDB flats?

Now let’s examine the question of demand and supply of HDB flats. After all, prices are a reflection of market supply and demand.

The HDB over-built about 16,000 5-room and larger flats which I understand took more than a decade to sell off.

Although the HDB is increasing its building of smaller flats, the fact that every BTO(Build-to-order) launch has been heavily over-subscribed is an indication that demand exceeds supply.

There is also the trend of more people down-grading to smaller flats to monetise their hone equity, which may also have fueled the demand for smaller flats.

With the record increase in the number of new PRs to 79,000 and new citizens to 21,000 last year, is it any wonder that HDB prices keep going up!

All these speculation could have been put to rest by making the relevant statistics available.

Is it not rather surprising that over the years, no MP has been able to ask a question in Parliament in such a way as to extract from the Government a simple answer as to the breakdown of the entire university population into foreigners, PRs and Singaporeans?

——

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】很多年长者不会用SingPass! 林瑞莲促设更多柜台服务选项

工人党党主席林瑞莲指出,很多年长者都不熟悉如“SingPass”(电子政府密码)的网上服务功能,所以相关政府柜台应该提供更多的服务选项。 林瑞莲上周末(7月4日)提出有关诉求,而工人党脸书专页也在同一天上载了该党竞选集会系列(The Hammer Show)短片,李瑞莲在短片中分享年长者使用SingPass政府官网程序的困难,而且很多年长者都没有SingPass账户。 她指出,基于她个人的观察和居民反馈,虽然知道很多人都没有SingPass账户,但是政府一直不停地推动所有人采用数据化程式服务,这样的情况仍然令人难以置信。 身为捍卫阿裕尼集选区议席的工人党候选人之一,她忆述数个月前才公积金局,碰到一名老先生和其女儿的情况。只见女儿给出使用SingPass的指示,老人家只是点头和跟随指示行动。“当我们在指登陆并使用政府服务时,并不只是传送电邮,而是你必须拥有正确的ID才能登陆,然后等待一次性密码。” “你之后还要输入一些复杂的程序,以确认身份,这些公式通常较模糊。我认为这些(对他们)是一大挑战。” 她指出,虽然大部分国民都认为数码交易和服务较为方面,但是还是有人认为这些程序非常繁重且难以管理。 事实上,还有很多居民为了能够使用这些数码服务而提高花费,毕竟他们必须拥有智能手机才能使用SingPass。她补充,基于安全,每个SingPass用户都只绑定一个电话号码,“意味着想要帮助父母的孩子们,还必须为父母亲提供一个电话号码,才能帮他们登记SingPass并进行交易,这些都加重了花费” 。 林瑞莲曾在预算案辩论上提出这项课题,建议为年长者提供低成本计划,包括让那些在使用线上账户管理有困难的人士,提供非数码服务,如设置服务柜台。 “通讯及新闻部长易华仁承认确实存在这些担忧,而最近我们也看到电信公司Telcos为年长者推出了一些基本计划。但是我认为这些计划仅限于居住在公共租赁房或社区关怀计划(ComCare)下的人们。”…

Between MHA, the Church, Function 8 and a whole bunch of “if”s

By Howard Lee – Much ink has been spilt over the recent…

LTA’s New Rail Financing Framework rewards SMRT at taxpayers’ expense

By Philip Ang / Terry Xu The Land Transport Authority (LTA) finally…

许通美脸书抱怨《海时》偏颇报导 引发最低薪资论战延烧

配合30周年庆晚宴,在10月26日,李光耀公共政策学院政策研究所(IPS)举办了共四场论坛,邀请多位部长和学者同台演讲,探讨社会政策、公民精神、贫富不均等议题。 不过,我国巡回大使许通美教授,在隔日阅读《海峡时报》报章后,就在个人脸书贴文对该报表达不满。由于许通美教授在论坛上发表对最低薪资看法, 有关落实最低薪资利弊的论战,也在其脸书贴文延烧,引来各路人马参与辩论。 在帖文中,许通美指出,《海时》报导了人力部长杨莉明在论坛上,提出有关最低薪资可能导致事业和非法就业的观点。 然而,当时许通美教授也参与了讨论,反驳了杨莉明的说法,指出日本、韩国、香港和台湾等新近过,都实施最低薪资制,并没有遇到杨莉明所形容的问题。然而, 《海时》却省略了许通美的意见,令后者质疑《海时》偏颇报导。 许通美说:“我很高兴并积极参与了公共政策研究所,在周四和周五进行的30周年庆论坛和晚宴。两项活动都非常成功。我对研究所所长 Janadas Devan致敬,因为他有勇气邀请我的好友–施仁乔,出席第三场的论坛讲座。” “然而,我想询问《海时》,为什么刊载了第一、二和第四场论坛的照片,却独漏第三场?难道普杰立部长和施仁乔的照片,有违国家利益?” 许通美称,他也向在《海时》任职的朋友抗议,该报对论坛的偏颇报导将使媒体失信于众,例如《海时》报导了部长杨莉明的观点,却省略掉他本身提出的反对意见。 “现有收入分配制度是道德耻辱” 他不忘在贴文中强调,我国现有的收入分配制度,乃是道德耻辱。献金还有很多劳动人士赚取的生活薪资不足,而陷入贫穷。…