Connect with us

Current Affairs

High rate of vaccination but tightened restrictions still on the table; is the gov’t confusing the public again about its position?

Published

on

Last Friday (3 September), Lawrence Wong, co-chair of the COVID-19 multi-ministry task force, said that authorities will only revert to tightened restrictions as “a last resort” with 81% of Singapore’s population vaccinated.

Mr Wong, who is also Finance Minister, said that the rise in daily cases Singapore is seeing is “not unexpected” as they are a result of a resumption of activities in the recent weeks.

Noting the shift in the administration’s approach to the pandemic, Mr Wong said that the focus now is not just on the daily case numbers—of which many are vaccinated persons who have been infected but experience mild or no symptoms—but also on the smaller number of infected persons who need supplementary oxygen or intensive care.

The latter, he says, “remains stable and under control”.

During the 3 September press briefing, Mr Wong noted that Singapore is now moving into a phase of living with COVID-19 and become “COVID-resilient”. As such, is not need to tighten restrictions.

He said: “In the past, when we have a situation of such high daily cases, we would have looked to measures like the heightened alert or even a circuit breaker to control the infection.”

“But we are in a new phase where we have a high level of vaccine coverage to protect Singaporeans, and we are now moving into a phase of living with COVID and becoming COVID-resilient.”

“And so we assess that there is no need to impose tightened restrictions. In fact, we would only revert to such a tightened posture as a last resort to prevent our hospital system from being overwhelmed.”

Mr Wong added that there is also no intention at the moment to open up more as they wanted to take some time to monitor the situation. Additionally, the taskforce also wanted to allow time for some new pilot programmes—such as vaccinated travel or allowing workers in dormitories to be out in the community—to bear out before contemplating further moves.

Despite all that, it appears that the government is changing its tune yet again.

Just a couple of days later on Monday (6 Sept), Mr Wong beseeched the public to scale back their social activities after the Ministry of Health urged all individuals to limit themselves to one social gathering a day.

The MOH had also announced that social gathers and interactions at workplaces would no longer be allowed from 9 September in order to reduce the community and workplace transmissions.

Mr Wong warned that cases have been doubling each week as the reproduction rate (R) of the virus is more than 1.

He said: “What is of concern to us is not just the absolute number of cases, but the rate at which the virus is spreading. And that’s the reproduction rate or R.”

“Currently the R is more than 1. Cases are doubling every week, and if we continue on this trajectory of infection, it means we could have 1000 cases in two weeks or possibly 2000 in a month.”

Mr Wong cautioned that based on the situation in other countries, a sharp rise in cases usually also means an increase in ICU cases and fatalities due to the virus

Stressing the need to slow down the rate of transmissions, Mr Wong said that the authorities “hope” this can be down without needing to go back to the heightened alert or circuit breaker.

However, he doesn’t rule it out entirely.

“We will try out best to refrain from using them, but we should not rule them out entirely,” he said.

“And if despite our best efforts, we continue to see or we see serious cases in ICU or needing oxygen going up sharply, then we may have no choice but to adopts a more tightened posture,” added Mr Wong.

More clarity is needed on criteria for easing or tightening restrictions

Mr Wong’s changing tune this week about possibly returning to tightened measures after assuring the public that they wouldn’t have to face further restrictions just two days prior can cause confusion, and importantly, also begs the question as to why there is a lack of clarity the criteria for restrictions moving forward.

In August, infectious diseases specialist and chairman of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Professor Paul Tambyah called for a clear set of criteria from authorities on how and when restrictions would be eased or tightened as the pandemic situation continues to develop and Singapore starts living with COVID-19 as an endemic.

Pointing out that certain things have been “really confusing and frustrating” for small business owners, such as the lack of clarity in the criteria that would trigger a scaling up or down of restrictions, Prof Tambyah noted that other countries tend to have a set of criteria for such situations.

He cited the example of New Zealand which went into a nationwide lockdown with just one new case reported.

During the live interview on his Facebook page, Prof Tambyah said: “We could have certain criteria like if it’s more than 10 cases or more than 10 unlinked cases, then you scale back certain things.”

“But, you know, a few weeks ago, when they introduced these restrictions [that] certain numbers of vaccinated people, certain numbers of unvaccinated people…and it was just really, really confusing,” he added.

Continue Reading
45 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
45 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending