Following backlash from sharing a post by pro-People’s Action Party (PAP) page Fabrications about the PAP (FAP), implying that Ms Sarah Bagharib is a member of the Workers’ Party (WP) and has an underlying political agenda, PAP politician Shamsul Kamar said that many have “misunderstood” his key intentions.

Ms Sarah, a communication specialist, was pulled into the spotlight when her wedding photo was used without permission as a prop in the People’s Association (PA)’s Hari Raya Aidilfitri display at an HDB estate in Tiong Bahru. The PA had removed the standee, and offered a public apology after Ms Sarah brought up the issue on social media.

However, the organisation later rejected her “accusations” of racism, branding the incident as “culturally insensitive” instead and an “isolated case”.

The post that Mr Shamsul shared was original posted by FAP on Thursday (17 Jun). It includes a photo of Ms Sarah next to one of the same photo with a face mask added to it. Below are two photos of three people in WP shirts and masks, implying that Ms Sarah is the same person in the WP photos.

The caption of his post read: “For all to decide… Everything happens for a reason but let’s not be divisive”.

Mr Shamsul is currently the adviser to Aljunied GRC grassroots organizations and also the Vice-Chairman for Northeast Community Development Council (CDC).

It has been confirmed by Ms Sarah and the other lady in the bottom photo that they are not the same person.

In a clarification to Mothership.sg on Friday (18 Jun), Mr Shamsul said, “I’m sorry that it seems many misunderstood my key intention of sending the message to everyone that we need to stand united rather than divisive especially during this period of the pandemic.

“If you read my posts especially on my public page, this has been a consistent message I have been advocating to let’s fight this pandemic together.

“That’s what the shared post was about.”

However, his clarification leaves more questions than answers because the incident involving Ms Sarah has nothing to do with the pandemic. And the post from FAP was insinuating that Ms Sarah is a WP volunteer, barring the fact that the alleged person in the picture is not Ms Sarah.

Given that Mr Shamsul represents the PA in his official capacity, it would be more likely that his comment on the FAP post is a hit on Ms Sarah over her remarks in response to the PA’s actions.

Furthermore, FAP appeared to have deleted any comments in support of or defending Ms Sarah, leaving only those that slander and vilify her. Looking at the post, it seems that the comments have been curated to be divisive against Ms Sarah.

In fact, one commenter on Mr Shamsul’s original post, which has since been removed, confirmed that her initial screenshots and comments proving that the two women in the photos are not the same person were deleted by FAP.

FAP has found itself in the spotlight before when it was removed by Facebook for violating the platform’s policies back in June 2020 during the General Election.

The FAP page – which was then run by Chua Chin Seng – garnered over 250,000 likes and is widely known as being pro-PAP and populated by hardcore pro-PAP internet trolls.

Back in 2017, Mr Chua was issued a warning by the police for breaching the Cooling-Off Day rules during the Bukit Batok by-election in 2016.

After the page was taken down in 2020, a spokesperson from Facebook said that it has taken action against several accounts in Singapore for violating its policies.

“These accounts were discovered during our on-going proactive work to find and take action against accounts that violate our policies. This action is based on the behaviour of these accounts, not based on the content they posted,” the spokesperson added.

The current FAP page was newly created under the name ‘Fabrication about the PAP 2020’ on 29 June 2020, just a few days after it was taken down.

On 17 June 2021, the name was shortened to just ‘Fabrications about the PAP’.

Subscribe
Notify of
31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Focus on Healthcare – Part 4: How we stack up internationally

Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis…

菲国扫毒执法过度涉人权疑虑 联合国通过决议调查

菲律宾总统杜特蒂(Rodrigo Duterte)自2016年开始强硬扫毒,近期更是将扫毒行动升级,发生扫毒行动期间3岁女童丧命案件,引发侵害人权疑虑。 据路透社报道,6月30日,黎萨省一名年仅3岁的女童米卡(Myca Ulpina)在扫毒行动中,遭警方击毙,引发社会哗然。警方当时宣称孩子的父亲(Renato)以米卡作为“人肉盾牌”,而警方则将父亲的行为视为反抗,才会开枪射杀。 然而,米卡的母亲却指控警方,当时他们并没有把小孩当盾牌。据悉,事发期间她们一家人都在睡觉,警方却在没有搜索令的情况下强行闯入房屋,而其中一颗流弹正好击中无辜的米卡,夺走她性命。她难过地说,“我的女儿才不是什么附带损害。” 神父比亚努维瓦(Flavie Villanueva)在米卡的葬礼上表示,“我已经无法计算自己为扫毒而受害的死者办了多少场葬礼,不过在这些葬礼上,我发现他们都是手无缚鸡之力的贫民百姓。“ 他也向米卡哀悼,“抱歉米卡,我无法保护你,抱歉,你出身在一个杀戮猖獗、把贫穷当成攻击目标的世界,抱歉他们对你说,你只不过是过程中的“附带伤害”。 意外发生之后,当局下令,当天参与缉毒行动的20名警察暂停职务,接受调查,但也有民意代表为警察辩解。 对此,参议员德拉罗沙(Senator Ronald Dela…

Treewizard questions the building of barriers on footpaths at MacPherson that hinder wheelchair access

In a series of Facebook posts between 8 December and today (10…

新捷运总裁颜睿杰因“个人失检”辞职

新捷运集团已向媒体证实,总裁颜睿杰已提呈辞职信。 各大媒体也竞相报导此消息。根据《海峡时报》报导,61岁的新捷运总裁颜睿杰,为其“个人失检”(personal indiscretion)行为负上责任,突然宣布辞职。 新捷运晚间向新加坡交易所发出通知,指颜睿杰将辞去职务,明年3月27日正式离职。 集团主席林日波称,颜睿杰是在今早向他呈辞,并为自己的行为深表歉意。 “颜睿杰已为他行为上的疏忽承担所有责任,董事会也以已经接受他的辞职。我们失去了一名为新加坡陆路交通付出不少的良好总裁。” 61岁的颜睿杰从2010年开始出任新捷运总裁。新捷运的股价在消息公布前,下跌0.02元,收市报2.70元。 颜睿杰在本月12日抛售了2万7300支新捷运股,在26日再抛出1万5000股。他持有3万支公司股票和15万认股期权。 颜睿杰曾任武装部队高职 曾在新加坡武装部队担任多项指挥及军事参谋的高级职务,颜睿杰于 2010 年…