An additional 10 workers at Changi Airport were tested positive for COVID-19 in a special testing operation, said the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) and Changi Airport Group (CAG) in a joint statement on Friday (21 May).

The 10 workers, who were among 19,000 frontline workers and office workers in the Changi Airport Passenger Terminal Buildings (PTBs) and Jewel Changi Airport being tested, were found to have been infected with the B1617 variant.

Phylogenetic testing results for an initial batch of COVID-19 positive airport workers were found to be similar and of the B1617 variant, indicating that they originated from a common source.

Preliminary investigations indicate that the initial transmission could have occurred through an airport worker who was assisting a family from South Asia, who arrived in Singapore on 29 Apr and were subsequently found to be positive for COVID-19 through their on-arrival tests.

Further investigations by Ministry of Health (MOH) and CAAS are ongoing.

The special testing operation was carried out from 9 May to 20 May.

As of 20 May, 43 airport workers in total tested positive for the virus.

The 33 other airport workers who have been tested positive for COVID-19 were detected while serving their Quarantine Orders, through earlier rostered routine testing, through MOH’s voluntary testing operation for visitors to Terminal 3, or upon seeking medical treatment from a general practitioner.

Most of these cases were detected early, said CAAS and CAG.

Cases peaked around 13 May, with very few cases among airport workers subsequently. None of the cases are in serious condition, require oxygen, or are in the Intensive Care Unit.

CAAS and CAG noted that all workers at Changi Airport Terminal 1 and Jewel have tested negative for COVID-19.

Ten workers from Terminal 3 were tested positive. Thus, as a precautionary measure, all airport workers who were working around Terminal 3 Basement 2 who had tested negative for COVID-19 in their first test, have been rostered to take an additional COVID-19 test since 20 May. Results are pending, said CAAS and CAG.

Additional cleaning and disinfection of Changi Airport PTBs and Jewel have been completed.

As an added precaution, Changi Airport PTBs and Jewel will remain closed to members of the public until the end of Phase 2 (Heightened Alert) period on 13 Jun.

During this closure period, airport workers will be briefed and trained on the new measures and requirements, to allow the new measures and safety protocols to be implemented smoothly.

The airport will remain open for air travel, said CAAS and CAG.

“Mutant virus” from “higher risk countries” has broken through airport

At an earlier press briefing on 14 May, then-Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung acknowledged that a “mutant virus” from “higher risk countries” has broken through despite the best efforts put up by the people working at Changi Airport.

“I think they really did their best but unfortunately this mutant virus, very virulent, broke through the layers of defense,” Ong said.

He added that from the first 20 over infections, Changi Airport has detected and found that the infections are quite congregated.

“Most in fact congregate around one zone and this is the zone with a finger pier that receive higher risk countries’ arrivals including South Asia and then the conveyor belt and immigration,” he revealed. “So, that whole zone and infections were all around that area.”

“So that zone is our equivalent of ward 9D, like Tan Tock Seng Hospital, and from that zone, workers go have their lunch, go have their meals at the Terminal 3 basement 2 commercial areas and the food court,” he added.

“And we suspect from there, it transmitted to members of public that visited the place.”

Ong also said that after a student was detected to have been infected after visiting the food court at Terminal 3 basement 2, Changi Aiport took action to close down the entire B2 commercial area at T3 for deep cleaning.

“Then we started special ops with MOH to test 9000 workers in T1, T3 plus Jewel,” he said. “What is noteworthy 500 workers in Jewel has been tested and results are out and so far all negative.”

Ong, who will co-chair the multi-ministry taskforce (MTF), added, “The big worry now is the onward community transmission coming out of the commercial area in T3 B2. And that is why we are announcing this series of measures today.”

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

读者不满领入息需28年 公积金局辩称确保“老有所养” 后八年支付“额外利息”

早前有读者Zol反映,自己的中央公积金退休存款入息被延长28年至93岁,致使他未来每月只能领取482元的入息。他质问,公积金局怎能随意决定会员该如何提取自己的存款? 于是,公积金局透过脸书回应这名会员,会员还是用20年领取退休户头储蓄,但是之后的八年,则是公积金支付的额外利息,帮助会员拉长支付期。 公积金认为,国人的寿命已经延长至90余岁,为此拉长支付期,乃是确保公积金会员可以获得足够的入息,确保“老有所养”。 公积金对于首三万元储蓄赋予两巴仙利率,下个三万元赋予一巴仙利率。对于这名会员的个案,则额外入息可以延长八年。 “他也可以加入公积金终身入息标准计划(CPF Life Standard Plan)来享有更高的终身入息。” 早前,Zol申诉每月482元显然不足以应付日益膨胀的生活开支,他参考新加坡平均寿命85.4年,向公积金局申请把派息期限缩减到20年和增加每月入息。 然而“爱民如子”的公积金局担心,Zol到了老年可能过早把退休储蓄用完,为此拒绝了Zol的申请。 在公积金给Zol的回函中解释,到了55岁若符合全额退休存款(FRS)(约17万6000元),加上4巴仙利息,到了符合入息年龄,20年内每月可提取910元。但是无法达到全额退休存款者,则会按比例获得入息,最低为每月250元,而Zol的情况下是28年每月入息482元。 由于和妻子膝下无子女,意味着Zol夫妇的存款没有继承/受益人,所以他延长提取入息期限到28年是不合逻辑的。…

大道上互推搡挥拳打人 两男子争吵险酿车祸

一名电单车骑士和一名男子在马路中间吵架,从一开始的互相推搡到后来险些上演武打片,就连路过行人都看不过眼上前劝架,才让闹剧结束分别离开。 署名Joshua的网民在脸书群组All Singapore Stuff,上传了一段将近4分钟的视频,并指上述事件发生在诺维娜医疗中心外的马路上。 据视频所见,一辆电单车和一辆黑色轿车停在马路中央,一名穿着全身黑色的大叔和一名穿着短裤的男子似乎互相叫骂,还推推搡搡。过程中,一直有一名男子在两人中间,充当和事佬,但是都没有成功。 短裤男子之后曾到黑车旁边,而黑车乘客座的门也打开,一名女子站在车旁和他理论。接着,短裤男又走回车前,而黑衣大叔一路跟随,甚至曾经一度挥拳打人,但是不成功而扑倒在地上,差点儿被迎面而来的车子撞上。 两人的吵架影响了周围的车辆行驶,所以鸣笛声不断。最终,路过行人上前帮忙劝架,两人才各自乘坐自己的交通工具,离开现场。 有关视频上传不到一天,已经吸引了超过4400人观看,网民也纷纷留言,呼吁执法当局采取行动。 大部分网民都对黑衣大叔要打人不成,反而跌倒被撞一事感到哭笑不得,认为什么事都不应该冲动打人。“打人不成反而跌倒,若被车子撞上,刚刚好医疗中心就在附近。” 然而,不少网民也呼吁道路使用者,无论是驾车人士或电单车骑士,都需要互相尊重和礼让,而且在马路上行驶也要有耐心。“一旦你撞死人了,你什么也没有了。” 他们也促请电单车骑士报警,因为对方开始动粗了。 然而,不少网民认为类似社会现象很平常,大多都是受到环境和生活压力影响,应该和刚刚上映的武打片无关。…

DPP in Parti’s case used to join perm sec dad in expensive French cooking escapade in Paris

It was reported yesterday that Liew Mun Leong’s former maid, Parti Liyani,…

总理起诉许渊臣 林鼎将担任辩护律师

针对新加坡总理李显龙起诉本社总编许渊臣,林鼎将担任后者的辩护律师。预计聆讯将在下月30日进行至12月4日。 2019年9月5日,本社总编收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中,对本社英语站发表《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系》的文章,总理提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 去年9月27日,许渊臣提呈答辩书。许渊臣认为内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 林鼎在今日在脸书公开讲作为本社总编辩护律师的消息,指出他赞赏许渊臣和《网络公民》作为独立媒体的工作,也强调替代媒体作为民主制度中第四权的重要。正是这类替代媒体能确保有权势和社会精英能继续接受问责。 许渊臣则表示,由于面对许多法律技术层面的挑战,不得已而寻求律师id协助。他也担忧总理的律师在审讯时挑起法律上的失误,为此需要有一名代表。此前,许一直在审讯中为自己辩护。 除了许渊臣,林鼎律师也代表时评人梁实轩,在面对总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护。 I…