On 11 April, the Ministry of Health (MOH) classified a COVID-19 case of an Indian national as an unlinked dormitory case. The man was first identified to have COVID-19 on 10 Apr and resides in a dormitory. He is a lashing worker with the Seafront Support Company Pte Ltd, and works at the Pasir Panjang Terminal.

Curiously, this case is a community case as he had not recently travelled into Singapore from India, and he did not contract the disease from there. He was clearly infected here in Singapore. This makes him the first COVID-19 infection reported in a foreign worker dormitory in six weeks since the last dormitory case on 28 February.

According to the MOH, the Indian national received his first dose of COVID-19 vaccine on 25 Jan, and the second dose on 17 Feb. On 7 Apr, he was tested as part of Rostered Routine Testing (RRT).

His pooled test result came back positive for COVID-19 the next day and was immediately isolated. He was tested again on 9 Apr, and his test result came back positive for COVID-19 on 10 Apr.

He was subsequently conveyed in an ambulance to the National Centre for Infectious Diseases. His earlier tests from RRT – the last being on 24 March – were all negative for COVID-19 infection. MOH assessed that the Indian national was likely to have been infected even though he has already been vaccinated.

This case remains unlinked as the MOH as been unable to track down where he might have been reinfected.

Three subsequent cases linked to Pasir Panjang Terminal

More than two weeks later, or 18 days specifically, the MOH announced that a Myanmar national working as a stevedore at Pasir Panjang Terminal and Brani Terminal and was confirmed to have COVID-19 on 28 April.

Two days later on 30 April, an Indian national working as a stevedore at Pasir Panjang Terminal and was confirmed to have COVID-19 on 30 April.

Then just yesterday (5 May), yet another community case was announced, also linked to the same location. This was the sole community case in Singapore that day.

The person who contracted the COVID-19 virus is a 59 year-old Singaporean who is employed by GKE Express Logistics Pte Ltd. He works as a trailer truck driver at Brani Terminal and Pasir Panjang Terminal and has been linked to previous cases also working at those terminals.

The Singaporean developed a fever and sore throat on 2 May. The next day, he sought medical treatment at a clinic and was tested for COVID-19. His result came back positive on 4 May, and he was conveyed in an ambulance to Alexandra Hospital.

Now that several cases have been linked to the Pasir Panjang Terminal, the question is how did the Indian national become reinfected in the first place?

The Indian national has not been allowed to travel freely around the country due to prevailing strict safety measures implemented on migrant worker dormitories, meaning that he could have only caught the virus either at the Pasir Panjang Terminal or the dormitory he lives in.

But if there had not been any other cases of infection in the Indian national’s dormitory, and that he had been the earliest case found among the cluster, where could he have gotten infected?

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

浅谈非选区议员谬论 朱正熙律师:这是个无上权力的附属品

翻译自朱正熙律师文章: “继续投我们(行动党),你还是能保持12名反对党在国会,而且是拥有充分投票权”,这是人民行动党强调非选区议员的论述。 人民行动党的论点看起来极富吸引力。显然,人民行动党认为此次仍然会大胜,这也是为什么他们在竞选期间一直专注于此课题(非选区议员)。然而,我并不认为这是一个很好的论点,甚至无法确定这是否对于新加坡是件好事,所以让我们更深入地思考非选区议员制度。 首先,人民行动党通于2016年通过了这项宪法修正案,以此赢得选举。当时仍有另一项饱受争议的宪法修正案为对民选总统进行修改。 每当你听到非选区议员的论点时,请注意,尽管它极具吸引力,但这是一个无上权力的附属品,摆弄我国选举制度的最根本。 我们在回答前一个问题前,先提出一个疑问:非选区议员制度会产生何种形式的影响?非选区议员将砍断各市镇会与政治代表的联系。当选的议员有权代表居民写信给政府,并能够掌控市镇会,使它对居民产生具体的利益。 因此,若砍断在野党对于市镇会掌控,等同于砍断他们能够为居民贡献的机会。 反观若人民行动党输了议员议席,该当如何?失去议席的人民行动党候选人还可以再基层担任基层领导,得到人民协会的大力支持。人民协会在2019年以5.16亿元持续经营。是的,你没看错,是将近5亿元的预算,可是输了的在野党却无法享有同等的待遇。 以《今日报》的报道为例,文章内也指出人民行动党如何利用市镇会来巩固人民行动党的权力。在竞选期未开始前,行动党的旗帜和海报已经充斥在马林百列集选区内,而市镇会的管辖亦包括协助挂上海报。 最后,也是最现实的问题,即使你想看到您属意的在野党,作为非选区议员出现在国会,你也得要把票投给他们,他们才有可能有机会成为非选区议员。 总而言之,请勿害怕投票给在野党! 原文阅读在此

公用局:若无法解决违约问题 将接管大泉水厂

公用事业局(PUB)于昨日(21日)发文告,表明若凯发集团无法在期限内解决大泉水电厂购水协议的所有违约问题,将终止购水协议,接管海水淡化厂。 公用局强调,将采取行动保障我国水供安全。考量到大泉水电厂目前财务状况,公用局献议以零元收购还是淡化厂,该厂无需支付任何赔偿。 本月5日,公用局就已向凯发的大泉水电厂发出违约通知,要求从当天起的30天内,必须解决违约问题。该局指出,大泉水电厂无法履行购水协议下的多项合约义务,尤其未能按照需求让水电厂继续可靠运作。 该厂甚至无法提供财务证据,证明水电厂有能力维持未来半年的运营。 该局称,大泉水电厂从2017年开始,就无法履行合约中的条款。当局已经给该厂足够时间去解决运营和财务问题,但现在的状况,违约情况很可能无法短期内改善,为此公用事业局需考量措施,确保我国的水供来源安全、充足。 大泉水电厂是在本周三询问公用局,若公用局有意收购,将接管整个水电厂,还是只接管海水淡化厂。 公用局表示,大泉水电厂此前曾表示,海水淡化厂即便未来几年还会继续亏钱,发电厂亦同。预见未来情况仍不会那么快好转。 公用局发出的违约通知截止日期是4月5日。 在2011年的水供协议下,从2013年至2038年,大泉水电厂每天必须提供7千万加仑的淡化水给公用局。 恐影响凯发“白武士”退出重组计划 公用局表示,收购大泉水电厂的价格将根据购水协议,由独立估价师评估。目前,该厂的估值为负值,即便完成收购,可能还要赔偿公用局。不过,公用局已表明,可以零元收购淡水厂并免除掉赔偿。 受到公用局违约通知影响,凯发的“白武士”印尼财团SM投资(SMI,或三林集团)的重组计划或有变动。凯发在本月18日指出,三林向该公司发出通知,指出若无法解决与公用局的违约通知,三林可履行合约权利,退出重组计划。…

NSP Sec-Gen announces her resignation from party after party re-enters 3-corner fight

Secretary General of National Solidarity Party (NSP), Hazel Poa has announced to…

No change in number of dengue infected cases for three weeks

National Environment Agency (NEA) has announced that there were a slightly hike…