Executive Sub- Editor of Lianhe Zaobao, Choo Lip Sin (Choo) shared his views in relation to reports on the upgrading of The Substation’s premises at 45 Armenian Street. Choo also further shared some of the sentiments expressed by the ex-Artistic Director of The Substation, Fendi, on the matter.

For those unaware, The Substation, which is Singapore’s first independent arts centre, will be vacating its iconic premises on Armenia Street in July 2021. The Substation has been at its current premises since 1985 and after more than 30 years, the National Arts Council (NAC) will be taking back the space for renovation works.

There are a few potential replacement premises that the arts centre is considering which include Goodman Arts Centre in Mountbatten, Aliwal Arts Centre in Kampong Glam as well as a few other venues sourced by The Substation’s team.

While members of the arts community rued the loss of the space which they described as integral to supporting less conventional works and collaborations within the arts community, there may be a chance that The Substation could return to the premises post-renovation.

In talking about The Substation, Choo first quoted some of the sentiments that were expressed by Fendi, who felt that the beginning of the end came with the opening of The Esplanade which led to The Substation becoming “neglected and increasingly irrelevant”, a testament to the “near perfect engineering and conditioning of memories and purpose by the State.”

Fendi was quoted as saying: “But one thing I will say is that an arts venue/space, any arts venue/space, especially one that claims aloud to be by and for the community MUST be stubbornly inclusive and diverse, and have great imagination in poverty.”

“This mission, one The Substation valiantly upholds and the legacy of Kuo Pao Kun, unnerves the State,” Fendi added.

He went on, “Many in the arts community still have reservations or difficulty with navigating or comprehending the what and how of being inclusive and being diverse. And no one wants to remain poor.”

Choo then penned his own opinion on the issue, noting that “all sorts of art “homes” have a place in Singapore, and the rustic, rudimentary, no-frills home for artists and art lovers that The Substation is deserves its solitary, undisturbed place on this island.”

He further opined that “The Substation offers an intimacy for exchanges, experimentations and experiences that the above-mentioned monumental spaces cannot emulate.”

Choo further stated that “losing The Substation as an independent and ungentrified art space is like what bull-dozing over Kampong Lorong Buangkok to build a new ‘Sengkang (a-la-Tampines) Hub’ will do to Singapore’s urban and social landscape. We give up a part of our collective souls in that process.”

He concludes his post noting, “We should ask why students, teenagers and emerging talents, young and less young, are not embracing the simple, unglorified setting that the Substation offers. It is more than a poverty issue.

Choo surmised that this is perhaps the same reason why many experts, academics and policymakers lament that the conserved shophouses in Kampong Gelam, Chinatown, Duxton-Tanjong Pagar, some parts of Little India, and Geylang “lack that vibrancy and rootedness to Singaporeanness”. This is “because no one lives in them, but they are also the same people who will never want to move in to live in a Singapore shophouse,” he added.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

记者质问新马领导对假新闻法立场 敦马:人民要我们废除

李显龙总理在马来西亚出席第九届新马领导人非正式会议,早上同马国首相马哈迪举行双边会议,而两人率领两国代表团举行会议后,在中午召开联合记者会。 记者会上,马国网络媒体《当今大马》记者,对两国领导抛出辛辣课题,针对新加坡近期将推行《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》,询问李显龙和马哈迪的立场。 记者质问,防假消息法遭到新加坡国内外人士质疑,包括”无国界记者“组织也抨击新法案可能赋予政府过大权力;反之,马国走完全不同路线,反而有意要废除前朝政府通过的《反假新闻法》。 李显龙对此则表示,不清楚马国《反假新闻法》具体内容,但可能和新加坡的防假消息法会有所不同。 他强调,网络假消息都是多国面对的严重问题,不止新加坡,德国、法国和澳洲都有立法对付,连英国也考虑透过司法管制网络假消息。 他解释,新加坡立法前有经过漫长的过程,成立特选委会听证和咨询,希望能在国会通过。 ”对于无国界记者的批评我不感意外,他也对我国的媒体管制诸多意见,但我们的目的,是落实能在新加坡可行的方针。“ “限制言论法恐遭滥用” 至于马国首相敦马则回应,废除假新闻法是希盟政府竞选承诺之一,“这是人民要的,我们尊重投选我们的人民的声音。” 他不排除社交媒体确实会被滥用,但马国选择接受挑战,学习如何应对处理。 他也表示,如果制定法律限制人民的表达意见,恐怕该法也可能被政府滥用,就如马来西亚的前朝政府一样。 “政府自己也可能制造假新闻,来保障自己的政权。”

博客鄞义林为诽谤和公众骚扰起诉出席法院

博客,鄞义林今早为他的两个不同的告状出席法院,分别是在高等法院诽谤起诉举行的审前会议和在国家法院出席有关芳林公园的诉讼案件。 新加坡总理, 李显龙在2014年5月份起诉鄞先生诽谤. 原因鄞先生写了一篇文章(“你的公积金款项去了哪里?城市丰收教会审讯的启示”),提到政府拿退休金和公积金用,进行投资,但是没有把利息还给新加坡人。在文章里,他将政府拿公积金使用和一个教堂资金的用法进行比较,说的是教堂牧师和他的两个同事开了两个机构,将钱转进去,让他们的妻子使用。 代表李总理的律师表示鄞先生的断言是没有根据的,而诋毁了李总理的名誉。 接着,鄞先生与其他五人被指在今年9月27日下午4至5时之间,在芳林公园和直落亚逸芳林公园联络所一带,与至少20个人共谋干扰基督教青年会举行的户外活动,对公众构成骚扰。他们涉嫌游行、大声叫喊、高喊标语和打鼓等。 以下是博客,鄞义林先生在前往高等法院和国家法院出席今天举行的审前会议发表的讲稿。   我现在正在要前往出席审前会议。 我必须在出席审前会议前最后的一分钟的前一天晚上更我 辩护的律师。 我正在前往出席今早9时在高等法院举行的审前会议。接着,在十点钟我将前往国家法院出席有关芳林公园的诉讼案件。…

欺骗分时度假会员取消配套可领回资金 法院判男子四年两周监禁

一名男子因涉嫌欺骗分时度假会员,取消配套可领回资金,被法院判处四年两周的监禁。 警方昨日(3日)发出文告,42岁的亚新(译名)涉嫌诱骗分时度假会员在终止会籍后,只要支付一定费用,便可索回资金。 据警方表示,他透过Solution One私人有限公司作为实施诡计的媒介,并且招募训练员工招揽客户。 “在2013年8月至2015年9月期间,已有47名分时会员接受这项服务”,警方表示。 实际上,亚新知道Solution One私人有限公司并没有这项服务,最终受害者支付94万2141新元后,却没有得到如预期的结果。 2018年6月28日,亚新被控欺诈营商(Fraudulent Trading),违反了公司法第340条。另一名与亚新共同经营Solution One私人有限公司的罪犯,亦被控相同罪名。 警方指出,目前两起诉讼仍在进行中。 另一方面,亚新在2015年的1月至7月期间,透过Allied…