On 17 September, two workers were preparing for a pipeline for maintenance works at 1 Merlimau Road on Jurong Island, which was also the location of Singapore Refining Company.

The Ministry of Manpower revealed that the workers were overcome by residual toxic gas in the pipe at 6 pm. As the third worker attempted to rescue them, he was also overcome by the toxic gas.

It was reported that the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) was alerted at 6:10 pm that evening, and the officers sent all three workers to Ng Teng Foong General Hospital. One of the workers was already unconscious at that point in time.

A MOM spokesman told The New Paper that one of the workers, who is a 30-year-old Indian national, passed away on 22 September after spending five days fighting for his life.

The employer of the workers was identified by the MOM as PEC, a plant and terminal engineering specialist provider.

The chief executive and general manager of Singapore Refining Company, Bill Stone, confirmed the tragedy and revealed that all three workers involved were contractors and the toxic gas was hydrogen sulfide.

Mr Stone expressed that he was “deeply saddened” by the death and injuries from this incident, and mentioned that his company is cooperating with the relevant authorities for investigations.

“We are deeply saddened by the loss of life and injuries resulting from this incident.”

“The safety of our personnel and partners is our immediate priority while we fully cooperate with the relevant authorities in their investigation.”

The other two workers were reported to be recovering.

The MOM spokesman mentioned that the maintenance works at the site had been ceased and investigations are in progress.

Following this particular incident, the Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) Council issued an alert on 29 September, advising that risk assessments and control measures must be implemented work is conducted to isolate pipelines.

The Council added that workers are required to be provided with the appropriate personal protective equipment to protect them from the hazardous gas and liquid releases.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Expats request Indian High Comm and SG Govt to get them back to SG soonest possible

Last month, it was reported that Indian nationals were asking their government…

An opportunity to have voices heard: Roy Ngerng to Australian radio

The following is a transcript of the radio interview which Australian ABC…

耶鲁-国大学院取消《异议与抵抗》课程,特斯拉:不应成为限制学生思考的理由

官委议员特斯拉博士(Walter Theseira)对耶鲁-国大学院异议课程被取消一事表达担忧,认为保护学子们免受敌对意识形态影响固然重要,但也不应限制他们的思想。 他昨日(8日)在脸书上分享其国会陈词,提到日前因开设《新加坡的异议与抵抗》而被耶鲁-国大学院取消课程,表示该事件也引起公众舆论意见分歧。 “有些人认为取消课程的决定已妨碍学术自由,另外则有人认为这门课程的设计相当于党派政治的入侵,甚至会带动新加坡大学的”颜色革命“,他说。 教育部长王乙康日前也声称,耶鲁-国大学院之所以会取消全因课程安排的严谨性不足,他也进一步表示,新加坡大学享受学术自由但并不代表允许党派政治或不合适的教师开课。 “本地学府被用来进行党派政治平台,表达对政府异议,不是空穴来风”,而教育部了解有关课程后也表达了担忧。 他说,课程也让外籍学生参观芳林公园和展示示威标语,而这可能让学生面对触法的风险。 但此番言论遭巡回大使许通美教授反驳,他于脸书发文非议王乙康的做法,认为后者不应妖魔化亚菲言,并指亚菲言是新加坡的“友爱批评者”。 特斯拉:不应以保护学生免受影响为由,限制学生的思想 对此,特斯拉提出五点。他认为,通识教育(liberal education,或称博雅教育)与所谓煽动或异议来影响学子毫无关联。反之,乃透过鼓励学生学习批判性思维、开拓其思想以及审视他人与自己思想和行动上的差异。 其二,尽管学术自由不意味着容许(缺乏严谨、过于偏激)的课程或导师。但也应提防借保护学生免受不良影响为由,封闭自身的思考。…

装修工疑偷工减料 以报纸填塞墙内空隙

用旧报纸填充边墙空隙交差?建屋发展局昨日在其官方脸书专页,揭发某组屋单位的天台边墙的窗户边框,竟是以旧报纸填充,令住户怀疑相关组屋承包商在整修时,是否为偷工减料省成本,以报纸填塞缝隙了事。 在接获住户投诉后,建屋发展局派员前往视察,了解该单位是在1984年完成。有关住户在1999年时,为该天台处窗户进行翻新,相信是负责翻新工作的承包商,以报纸填塞连接窗户的边墙。 对此住户一直被蒙在鼓里,直到近期他打算换薪窗户,在拆下窗户时,才揭发此事。 建屋发展局在帖文中表示,经过检查已得知有关以报纸填塞的边墙缝隙,未构成结构安全威胁,不过也立即进行修补。该局称目前仍在进行调查,一旦发现有关装修承包商有失误,会马上采取行动对付。 立即就有许多网民在有关建屋局贴文留言,除了要求彻查偷工减料一事,也再引起大家对组屋品质的关注。一些网民纷纷留言申诉,在装修厕所时,还有装修工斗胆问他,有没有多余的旧报纸,好让他可以填补墙壁空间。 网民May Ngway也表示,有次装修时看见工人也这么做,立马要求他们拿出旧报纸,用真材实料补洞。 网民:空隙是否本就存在? 不过,有者就提出质疑,装修工以报纸填塞缝隙确实错了,但原本的缝隙,又是从何而来?是否有关组屋单位刚建造时,墙内本就是中空的? Lawrence Marshall则指出,填充旧报纸绝不是好注意,许多在中国和台湾的豆腐渣工程,就是因为发展商用旧报纸来填塞建筑物结构,而导致后来发生倒塌事故。 审视公共组屋问题…