The Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam revealed on Friday (2 October) that he will deliver a ministerial statement in Parliament in November on the questions raised about former domestic worker Parti Liyani’s acquittal of theft case, after the police and Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) completed their reviews.

Mr Shanmugam said this to Channel News Asia and noted that the reviews are expected to conclude in “two to three weeks’ time”.

Earlier on 16 September, the Minister said that he would be delivering a ministerial statement in Parliament in October about Ms Parti case.

His remark came following questions filed by a number of MPs, including Workers’ Party chairman Sylvia Lim. The MPs has also asked for an adjournment motion on the case for Parliament to debate at its next sitting.

While speaking to reporters, the Law Minister stated that it would be good to “openly set out what happened and deal with the questions”.

On 8 September, when being asked to comment on the case during the sidelines of a grassroots events, Mr Shanmugam said that the authorities take the judge’s comments very seriously, and will deal with what went wrong in the process of investigations.

He noted that it was good to see that justice has been served, based on the High Court’s judgment.

He also warned the public against prejudging on which part of the process errors had been made, and that they should wait for the outcome of reviews that are now being carried out by the authorities.

“In the process, we should not be defensive. It should not be a witch hunt. It’s good to be a fair process. We have to find out what happened, why it happened and then deal with it. And be accountable. That’s the best way to build trust in public, in the system. To come out in public and say what steps we have taken once the reviews are done,” the Minister remarked.

Background of case

For those who are not aware of the case, on 4 September, the High Court dismissed the convictions of Parti Liyani, an Indonesian domestic worker on four theft charges brought against her by the AGC, four years after she was first arrested by the Singapore Police at the Changi Airport.

Ms Parti was the ex-domestic helper of Changi Airport Group (CAG) Chairman Liew Mun Leong and his family, and had worked for them for eight years. She was arrested in December 2016 after returning to Singapore as there was a warrant out for her arrest.

Mr Liew had earlier filed a police report against her two days after her service was abruptly terminated and she was sent back to Indonesia, claiming that she had stolen valuables from family members amounting to S$50,000.

After a series of investigations and court hearings, Ms Parti was sentenced 26 months of imprisonment by District Judge Olivia Low on 25 March 2019. However, Justice Chan Seng Onn of the High Court overturned the conviction earlier in September, effectively clearing the Indonesian national of all charges made against her.

According to the Straits Times, on 29 September, Ms Parti had filed a notice to discontinue the proceeding against the deputy public prosecutors (DPP)—Tan Wee Hao and Tan Yanying—who conducted her trial for theft.

As such, the court has given Ms Parti two weeks to decide if she wants to go forward with her application to begin disciplinary proceedings against the two DPP.

In fact, Ms Parti has not been home to Indonesia in four years since this entire saga begun and that she is naturally eager to return as soon as possible.

Even so, Ms Parti is said to be “somewhat torn” because she still believes that the DPPs should answer to the allegations she has made against them in her affidavit, on their conduct of her case.

Following the hearing, the AGC said in a statement that the two DPPs “welcome the chance to present a full and transparent account of what transpired during the trial” and “will cooperate fully in any inquiry”.

In response to this, Mr Shanmugam told CNA that “the AGC did not object to the appointment of the disciplinary tribunal, because this would provide an opportunity for the prosecutors to give their account of what happened, and explain themselves”, adding that the matter remains before the courts.


Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like


8月4日新增的七起入境病例皆来自印度,其中包括两名本地永久居民、以及印度籍的19岁学生准证持有者、两名家属准证持有者和两名工作证件持有者。 据卫生部文告指出,昨日新增的冠状病毒19确诊病例为295起,其中有七起入境病例,都是来自印度。其中就有一名家属准证持有者是五岁的男童,曾经和早前确诊的27岁印度籍女子有接触。 社区病例占了两起,包括一名曾和之前确诊的38岁孟籍男子有过接触的孟加拉籍男子,而另一名则是从事必要服务,接受检测后确诊的31岁新加坡籍女子,暂时和其他病例无关联。剩余的286起病例,都是住在宿舍的工作准证持有者。 庆幸的是,昨日没有新增感染群,并且有九间宿舍转为安全宿舍,脱离冠毒感染群名单,包括有SCM大士客工宿舍以及大士村客工宿舍(Tuas View Dormitory)。 昨日的出院及离开隔离区人数达275人,将康复人数累计到4万7454人。 目前,我国病例已经达到了5万3346起,接受护理或隔离的人数有5740人,住院人数有125人,包括一人尚在加护病房留医。

别让“天声人语”变成“天怒人怨” 政府受促先专注疫情

冠状病毒19肆虐全球,但若政府有计划举行选举,究竟政治和生命,孰轻孰重? 新加坡前进党昨日就上载了广东话线上访谈节目《天声人语 第二集:生命比政治重要》,明确表明了他们的立场。 视频嘉宾,新加坡前进党助理秘书长梁文辉在接受黄志伟访问时,就分享了他认为目前疫情严峻不适合举办大选的原因,其中包括危及我国人民,尤其是年长者的健康安全、会分散防疫工作能力、距离本届政府届满还有将近一年的时间。 他鼓励人们在这段时间内,促进和家人的关系,并且照顾年长者的健康。他分析道,年长者为冠毒的高风险人群,若现在举办选举,所有防疫措施都要一步到位,否则投票时用的笔和选票都可能成为传播病毒的媒介。 此外,他希望政府能够关注在防疫工作上,尽量不要分散相关工作的人力、物力和财力,否则会加重防疫前线人员的工作,而一直以来的努力也白费了。 “新加坡的宪法规定,我们的大选期限是到2021年4月。所以时间很充裕,至少有一年以上,政府不需要急着举行大选。” 他也提到,基于外劳宿舍的交叉感染导致国内病例增加,因此呼吁政府“集中精神,先解决疫情这个问题”。

Singapore banks told to phase out SMS OTP as sole factor of authenticating high-risk transactions

The Monetary Authority of Singapore has required banks to phase out SMS OTP as a sole factor to authenticate high-risk transactions,” said Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in a recent parliamentary reply

Visit by PM Lee Hsien Loong to Bali, Indonesia, for the Singapore-Indonesia leaders’ retreat and ASEAN leaders’ gathering

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is paying a visit to Bali, Indonesia,…