Earlier on 21 May, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung addressed some of the concerns that many parents have raised following the Government’s announcement to reopen schools after the country exits the circuit breaker on 2 June.
The Minister remarked that attending schools cannot be made “voluntary” as such a system is “not good for the morale of both students and teachers”.
In addressing the concern of children having problems in wearing a face mask for the whole day at school, Mr Ong noted that they can opt to wear a face mask or a face shield when in school or on campus.
“Schools will be arranging to distribute face shields to all preschool and primary school students in Term 3. Teachers will help the young children get used to the masks or shields with time. If there are special circumstances, teachers will also exercise flexibility,” he said.
In response to that, Mansura Sajahan – a member of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) – took to her Facebook on Tuesday (26 May) to call out the education minister for being “very irresponsible” for not making it compulsory for students to wear a face mask.
“Mr Ong is being very irresponsible in not making wearing of masks compulsory for students. Infectious disease experts caution that face shields provide limited protection and should be worn together with other masks in order to be effective,” Ms Mansura wrote.
She added, “This is on top of making school compulsory, yet wearing of masks not compulsory.”
Ms Mansura said that when the COVID-19 infection in the country was still considerably low, the ministers and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong “discouraged” Singaporeans to wear a face mask, even though many health experts have warned that masks should be worn by all.
“One Minister even said they distributed a number of masks to each household just to make Singaporeans feel ‘shiok‘,” she asserted.
But when the infected cases increased, “mask-wearing was made compulsory”, Ms Mansura added.
She went on to say that Mr Ong is “acting in an arrogant manner” when it comes to the safety and health of the students. She also questioned the Minister if he would take responsibility in case one of the students gets infected with the virus for not wearing a mask.
“Is he going to take responsibility if even one student gets infected with COVID-19 through not wearing of masks, let alone if a cluster forms? Accountability is low or non-existing in our present government, that is perhaps why Mr Ong is acting in this manner,” Ms Mansura stated.
On that note, she remarked, “At the most, they might apologise. But as a parent, I cannot allow this to happen to our children.”

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Two men who met up at Robertson Quay during CB charged in court today

During the circuit breaker (CB) period where social gatherings were prohibited, people…

A memorial gathering in honour of Tan Jing Quee

by: Teo Soh Lung/ Tan Jing Quee, historian, writer, poet and lawyer…

醉酒洋汉殴打商场保安 被判监禁一周

今年4月,因找不到商场出口而迁怒商场保安的洋汉,涉及蓄意伤人与抵触防止骚扰法令两项罪名,昨日(23日)被法院裁定监禁一周。 被告米尔斯(Stuart Mills)是我国永久居民,今年4月4日,在东海岸乐路乐斯广场(Roxy Square)凌晨12点左右,与受害者保安林清福发生争执,甚至挥拳将保安打倒在地,导致林清福右眼红肿、脖子扭伤,而被告在打完后随之逃之夭夭。 据当天案情显示,被告在和朋友喝了酒后,打算离开商场,但由于已凌晨,找不到出口,便向保安林清福反映,林清福向他解释入夜后大部分商场出口已关闭,但仍有三个出口,他也愿意带男子到出口。 然而,米尔斯不满意林清福的解释,不理会保安的解释,甚至是用手阻挡保安的去处,而当保安试图推开时,米尔斯却声称保安推撞。后来还三番四次挑衅林清福打架,直到林清福受不了,对他大喊“够了”,米尔斯当即挥拳,将林清福打倒在地。 林清福在事后表示,他当时有试图向米尔斯解释,但米尔斯态度强硬,不予理会,且情绪看似愈发激动。他曾经问米尔斯是否想动手打他,洋汉愤怒表示有想打他的意愿。考量到自己的安危,便示意身旁同时录影,而被告在打了林清福后,甚至还威胁试图录影的同事。 米尔斯代表律师在庭上则向法官求情,对此被告已忏悔,并曾回到商场向林清福道歉,且作出2000元赔偿,随后还被带回警局调查。 律师也指出,由于视频被疯传,其个人资料被泄,导致被告在案发后五个月仍受到骚扰信到他家中,他也患有严重忧郁症,目前正在接受治疗。 法官在宣读判决时表示,被告在毫无人挑衅下迁怒与他人,也接受检方的说辞,有别于拥有正当权力的警察,保安更应受到法律的庇护,因而判刑被告一周监禁。