Singaporeans are “wise enough” to make judgments based on the Government’s long term performance, not just based on “an episodic event” during the coronavirus pandemic, the Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing said in an interview with Bloomberg TV on 20 May.
In the interview, Mr Chan noted that there’s “not much time” left for the Government to hold its next general election (GE) as the country has to dissolve Parliament by January 2021.
“We would like, when the opportunity arises, to have a strong mandate because the challenges that we are going to face in the coming years will indeed be the challenge of an entire generation,” he told the Bloomberg reporter.
Singapore People’s Party (SPP) chairman, Jose Raymond, concurred with the minister’s remark that Singaporeans are wise enough to look at the Government’s long term performance. But at the same time, Singaporeans should also remember some of the issues that arise under the current Government’s ruling, said Mr Raymond.
Mr Raymond took to Facebook earlier today (21 May) highlighting six issues that Singaporeans should keep in mind when they are called up to decide in the next GE.
“I do agree with him, in that Singaporeans should be wise enough to look at the performance of the Government over the long (in my view, the last) term and make that call. They should remember these points and more when they are called up to decide,” he wrote.
These six issues include:

  1. the rising cost of living in Singapore;
  2. depressed wages due to influx of cheap foreign labour;
  3. diminishing value of HDB homes due to lease decay;
  4. Singapore’s problematic elected presidency policy shift;
  5. inequality;
  6. and lack of job opportunities for Singaporeans.

Mr Raymond indicated that it is “almost a given” that the country will face challenges in the future, but for now it should look at the challenges that will arise tomorrow, next week, and in the coming month as Singapore moves into Phase One after the Circuit Breaker.
“Jobs are being lost, businesses are being shuttered, livelihoods are at risk,” he stated. “People are going to have to put food on the table and still give their children the promise that they too, will have a fair shot at opportunities in future.”
On that note, Mr Raymond questioned the Government’s next move, “How do we restart? How do we reconfigure? How do we adapt? How do we lead?”

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank’s internal review found ‘no evidence’ of China influence

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) stated that there is “no evidence” of Beijing’s dominance over the bank, following allegations made by a former executive. The AIIB conducted an internal review and found no improper influence, affirming its adherence to multilateral governance standards. The bank acknowledged the need to address certain issues raised during the review but dismissed the allegations as unsubstantiated. The AIIB, established as a counterweight to Western financial institutions, has 106 global members but not the United States.

PV’s Azlan Sulaiman pledges to raise issues on jobs and living costs in Parliament

Peoples Voice (PV) is in the process of introducing their candidates who…

Parliamentary motion on recusal of WP MPs should serve as "solemn reminder" to set "higher bar" for S'pore's leadership: DPM Heng

The Parliamentary motion on “should be a solemn reminder” for Singapore’s leadership…

K Shanmugam accused of misleading Parliament on “fugitive” label, disregarding context of LHY’s statement

Former Singaporean political activist Tan Wah-Piow accused Minister Shanmugam of misleading Parliament and unfairly attacking Lee Hsien Yang and his wife. Tan argued that LHY was not obligated to assist the police and was pushed into being a “fugitive from injustice.” He also criticized the Minister for character assassination and the People’s Action Party for targeting perceived political threats.