The leaked audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s remark over the public panic buying behaviour that circulated online captured the attention of Hong Kong media and netizens.

On 10 February, Mr Chan, who is the Minister for Trade and Industry, conducted a closed-door meeting with a group of business leaders organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCI) on the latest developments impacting the country’s economy and society.

As can be heard in the recording, Mr Chan used Singlish in the meeting, describing the government’s dilemma in handling the mask distribution and calling the Singaporeans’ behaviour of panic buying and hoarding essential items as “disgraceful” while describing people who do so as “idiots”.

Commenting on Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, who wore a mask at the press conference, Mr Chan frankly said that if everyone in the government wears a mask when attending press conferences like Ms Lam, it might stoke panic among the public and lead the country’s hospital system to being “broken down”.

He cited the media report on insufficient mask supplies for Hong Kong medical staff, saying, “What is happening to Hong Kong now? What did South China Morning Post just report about Hong Kong? They are down to less than one month supply of mask for their medical people. Which means that when the medical people don’t even get the mask, you think they dare to go and take care of the sick people?”

Mr Chan also criticised the behaviour of Singaporeans rushing to stockpile toilet paper like Hong Kong citizens as “monkey see monkey do”.

In fact, Hong Kong’s toilet paper supplies might come from mainland China but Singapore imports these goods from Malaysia and Indonesia, said Mr Chan.

He added, “No paper, water also can. So why do we behave so idiotically?”

Speaking on the panic buying of alcohol swabs as well as condoms, Mr Chan called them as “selfish idiots” because the alcohol swabs are originally used for medical purposes but people are now using them to “clean tables”.

He went on to say Singaporeans must not behave like idiots – as people are in Hong Kong. He further explained how this behaviour could impact the country’s international standing.

He noted, “Even if Hong Kong behaves badly like idiot, somebody will do business with them because they are part of China. Already got people trying to raise the price. Then you all behave like idiots, the foreign supplier lagi raise their price.”

The minister added, “Every country can behave like idiots, Singaporeans must not behave like idiots. Then we behave properly, then we show the world how different we can be. Then people will have confidence.”

 

Following the leak of audio recording, SCCI issued a clarification notice stating that the act of its grassroots member who leaked the audio recording is “unacceptable and deeply disappointing”.

The letter, which was penned by Mr Roland Ng, President of SCCCI, explained that the leaked audio recording was unauthorized and a clear breach of trust, noting that all its participating members were already informed that it was a closed-door dialogue and should be off-the-record before, during, and after the session.

“It has done damage to SCCCI’s standing as a chamber of high repute,” SCCCI stated in the notice. “This has betrayed the trust that SCCCI has built with Minister Chan over the years.”

Hong Kong’s response to Minister Chan Chun Sing’s remark

The remark of Mr Chan for calling people panic buying as “disgraceful” and urging Singaporeans to not follow Hong Kong citizen’s behaviour has been reported by Hong Kong online media, such as Headline Daily and Sing Tao Daily.

As a result, Hong Kong netizens felt offended by Mr Chan’s remark. They claimed that although it was not a good behaviour to practice hoarding, but for Singapore who does not understand the actual situation in Hong Kong and called it as “disgraceful” is not appropriate.

One netizen Andala Ho explained that the situation in Singapore is different with Hong Kong as Hong Kong was affected badly due to coronavirus outbreak because most of its food and essential items are imported from China.

(Translated: Indeed, but it is also inappropriate for a minister to comment and mock other country.)

(Translated: This is improper to criticise Hong Kong as Singapore also faced panic buying, rising price of face masks and spreading rumours.)

 

Few netizens also penned their opinion on the reasons behind the panic buying. One of the reasons cited was the lack of confidence in government – which can be seen in the protests that lasted for about eight months in Hong Kong last year.

(Translated: The dictatorship resulted from one-party ruling lead to lack of security and faith in the citizens. That’s why the panic buying situation happened in Hong Kong.)

(Translated: Hong Kong citizens panic buying showed government’s incompetence.)

 

Some netizens mocked that Singapore ought to have a good solution for the outbreak of coronavirus. But despite so, panic buying situation still happened in Singapore as well.

(Translated: We have to depend on ourselves as government could not provide any assistance. Hopefully Singapore find a solution to deal with the coronavirus when the outbreak happens.)

(Translated: Before criticising other countries, Singapore should find some measures to control the coronavirus epidemic first as there are more confirmed infected cases in Singapore than Hong Kong.)

(Translated: “Point at the mulberry tree and curse the locust tree”, panic buying happened in Singapore as well.) 

(Translated: Singaporeans show more extreme in panic buying where the supermarkets being cleared of items.) 

 

However, some Hong Kong netizens agreed that the panic buying situation in Hong Kong would likely be mocked by the entire world.

(Translated: This is true! It reflected our image in the international arena.)

(Translated: Hong Kong citizens showed global a negative example of how selfish and idiot we are.) 

(Translated: As a Hong Kong citizen, I also feel ashamed of our citizens’ behaviours.)

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

India’s External Affairs Minister: SG and India are “solid partners” and Delhi Chief Minister doesn’t speak for India

It was reported that the Ministry of Health (MOH) issued a statement…

DBS customers can now use face verification technology for digital banking services

DBS customers can now use a face verification feature to conduct digital…

主妇叹差太多了 不同诊所购疫苗价格差一倍

同一种疫苗,两个诊所卖两个价,价钱差几乎一倍,令求诊者费解。 有关疫苗为成人的麻疹、腮腺炎、德国麻疹联合疫苗(MMR)。一名不愿具名的家庭主妇(50岁)因下个月将到菲律宾旅游,需事先接受麻疹疫苗(MMR)注射,因此拨电到国立健保集团旗下的大巴窑综合诊所,询问有关疫苗价格,被告知每剂疫苗注射收费40新元。 不过,主妇的丈夫较早前,前往陈笃生医院的旅客保健及疫苗诊所接受注射,只收费29元。 而主妇的胞妹随后拨电询问新保集团旗下,淡滨尼综合诊所有关MMR疫苗注射收费时,被告知每剂疫苗收费仅20元3角。 主妇发觉,三间诊所的疫苗注射价格差距后,感到费解。她说道,虽然理解不同地方的价钱会有所差异,但是相差一倍是在太离谱了,更何况综合诊所都是政府的。“这种算是普通的疫苗,没理由价格相差这么多。” 新加坡卫生部在全国成人免疫计划下,促请成人能够注射两剂MMR疫苗,而注射费用也能使用保健储蓄支付。这个疫苗在我国三大区域医疗系统的综合诊所都有提供。 新保集团:多年未调整 国大综合诊所集团透露,每剂MMR疫苗注射收费40元;国立保健集团和新保集团告知媒体,他们综合诊所向7岁以上求诊者收费分别是40新元和20新元3角。前年甫成立的国大综合诊所,当时旗下共有五间综合诊疗所,其中四间还是从国立健保集团那儿接手的。 新保集团表示,虽然他们知道公共医疗机构的收费有所不同,但是该集团的MMR疫苗价格并没有根据多年来的价格变动而做出调整,所以收费仍是较为廉价。“在未来检讨价格时,MMR疫苗价格也会被列入当中,并把最新成本和病患所能承担的负担纳入考量中。” 另外两家疫苗收费较高的集团则表示,他们致力于为病患提供能负担得起的优质护理服务。 药物价格差别原因多 卫生部长颜金勇曾在2012年国会上提到,公共医院药物价格有差别的原因很多,包括他们在药物新旧合约上的买卖价格有变动、各机构的价格框架不同等。…

泰国法院指证据充足 爱国党命运3月7日定案

泰国宪法法院下周四(3月7日)裁定,是否解散泰国爱国党。 宪法法院指出,法院认为选委会做出的解散爱国党申请证据充足,无需进一步调查,一次将在下个月7日开庭审案,并且在同一天宣布判决。 亲泰国前首相他信的爱国党于2月8日宣布,提名泰国公主乌汶叨参与首相竞选,引起轩然大波。泰王于同一天表示反对公主参政,并表示皇室地位超越政治。选委会随后宣布乌汶叨公主不具备参选资格,更指爱国党此举有违反君主制,违反宪法,因此申请解散爱国党。 大选后决定是否提空塔纳通 另外,泰国间房指出,将在3月24日泰国大选后,于3月26日决定是否提空另一位政党党魁,即未来前进党党魁塔纳通。塔纳通被控违反电脑犯罪法,涉嫌于去年6月29日,在社交媒体脸书散布有关泰国军人政府的假消息。一同被控的还有两名党员。 塔纳通昨日(2月27日)遭检察官传召问话后,怒斥对手企图耍阴招。他表示该党无畏阻挡,将继续前进。“我们相信自己的清白,也相信人民的力量。” 塔纳通是泰国最大汽车零件制造上,高峰集团的执行副总裁兼董事,与去年3月设立了未来前进党,打开了泰国政坛新局面。 塔纳通在竞选活动的政策辩论上,表现出色。他所提出的政策和帅气的外表,为他吸引了不少支持者,更成为年轻选民的追随者。自竞选活动开跑以来,他就不断的批评泰国军方的开销,以及泰国自从武装部队总司令巴育就任后,就陷入了独裁主义者的手中。 巴育不参加政策辩论 相反的,巴育于周二(2月26日)指出,他将不会参加任何政策辩论,不是因为害怕人民批评,而是因为他的工作很忙,辩论使他感到“头痛和浪费时间”。 泰国大选落于3月24日,选举委员会将首度举办辩论会,让候选人们能够发表各自的施政理念。多名候选人呼吁巴育参与辩论,而公民力量党作为提名巴育的政党则指出,巴育目前仍然是公仆,必须保持政治立场中立,因此向选委会申请,让巴育不用参与辩论。 巴育于26日内阁会议后的记者会上,未等选委会决定,就已经宣布不会参与辩论。