Wuhan Medical Treatment Centre

The incubation period for Covid-19 could be as long as 24 days, instead of the previously thought 14 days, according to new research by researchers in China.

The study, based on data gathered from 1,099 patients diagnosed with the new coronavirus at 552 different hospitals in China showed that the incubation period for the virus ranged from zero to 24 days, with less than half of patients (43.8%) having a fever when they first see a doctor. The numbers increased to 87 percent after hospitalisation. About 67.7 percent of patients also had a cough.

This could mean that a more extended period of isolation/quarantine is required than the 14 days many health authorities around the world are currently using, including Singapore.

About three dozen researchers in hospitals and medical schools in China led by Dr Zhong Nanshan, the epidemiologist who discovered the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus back in 2003, noted in the study that early identification methods could be defective given what we now know, meaning that many infected people could go undiscovered.

The frequency of Covid-19 cases with no fever is higher than those in SARS and middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS), the study found. So surveillance measures and case definition guidelines that focus heavily on fever detection could lead to these infected patients being missed initially.

The study was published on Sunday (9 February) on a medical research archive called medRxiv. The site noted that the paper is a ‘prepublication’ and has not been peer-reviewed, so it should not be used to guide clinical practice.

CT scans fail to identify many who are infected

Another revelation of the study is that relying on CT scans to identify those who might be infected with Covid-19 is not entirely reliable since only half of those who underwent CT scans showed ground-glass opacity, and only 46 percent showed bilateral patchy shadowing.

On 27 January, China’s National Health Commission revised its diagnostic criteria to no longer require CT scans showing pneumonia in identifying suspected cases. However, there was a concern that the nucleic acid tests (NATS) alone were producing too many false-negative results, leading some doctors to suggest that CT scans be used as a basis for diagnosing the infection.

Most transmissions are human-to-human

The study also showed that only 1.18 percent of patients had close or direct contact with wildlife, which is where experts believe the virus might have emerged. However, about 31.3 percent had been to Wuhan City, the epicentre of the virus, and 71.8% had close contact with those from Wuhan.

This tracks with reports of people being infected at gatherings and events – such as the business meeting held in Grand Hyatt Singapore which led to several infections. This presents a risk that the infection could spread further via a small group of people transmitting the virus to others.

The study concluded that Covid-19 is transmitted via the conventional route of respiratory droplets and direct contract. However, it also found that 6.5 percent of 62 stool specimens tested positive for the virus, while testing of four more patients show the presence of the virus in their gastrointestinal tract, saliva, and urine.

The researchers, therefore, urged for protection measures to take into account possible transmission via gastrointestinal secretions.

Lower fatality rate and a threat to medical workers

The study also showed that about 2.09 percent of patients are healthcare workers, shining a light on how the outbreak could be a threat to medical workers on the frontlines.

Though China’s health authorities have not said how many medical workers have been infected, a different paper released by South Central Hospital of Wuhan University said that 40 doctors and nurses were confirmed to be infected as of 28 January.

Finally, researchers found that the fatality rate of Covid-19 is lower compared to that of SARS or MERS which have been reported to be 15 percent and 35 percent respectively.

According to the World Health Organisations (WHO) latest situation report on 11 February, there are now 43,103 confirmed cases of Covid-19 around the world, with 42,708 being in China, which reported 2,484 new cases in just one day. As the country that is hardest hit by the virus, China has also reported 1,017 death due to the virus.

Only one person has died due to the virus outside of China, though he was from Wuhan in Hubei Province, and is believed to have been infected before leaving the country.

In Singapore, the Ministry of Health (MOH) announced two new cases yesterday (11 February), bringing the total up to 47, with 25 of those being locally transmitted cases. Of the confirmed cases, nine have fully recovered from the infection and have been discharged from hospital, said MOH.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

逾76万公积金会员 获得家庭保障计划保费回扣

逾76万名公积金会员获得家庭保障计划(Home Protection Scheme,简称HPS)的保费回扣,总额达6亿4000万元。 中央公积金局昨日(9日)发文告,由于投资取得更好的回报,加上索偿比预期来得少,因此会员将会获得保费回扣(Premium rebates),其中半数保费回扣至少500元以上。 文告指出,回扣会直接存入受惠会员的公积金普通户头,用来支付今后的保费和其他费用如贷款。 会员也会在1月中旬以信息、电邮或信件的方式获得通知。此外他们还可以通过电子政府密码SingPass登录公积金网站,在交易记录(Transaction History)一栏查看自己是否获得保费回扣。 上次回扣已经是2015年11月。

From Hard Truths to Hard Choices – Singapore thinkers take on PAP's entrenched governance mindset in new book

By Howard Lee Singapore can no longer rely on a fixed set…

New Naratif’s podcast presents a fresh perspective on the recent hawker industry controversies

On the New Naratif fortnightly podcast ‘Political Agenda’, Dr Thum Ping Tjin,…

职总企业并购KOPITIAM:关乎竞争垄断与公共利益透明化?

最近媒体报导,职总创优企业合作社收购本地咖啡店和小贩中心运营商KOPITIAM集团,但是实际并购价格至今未公开。 据报导,KOPITIAM集团在全岛有80分行,预计并购交易将在年底完成。 并购若成功,将造就全国最大规模的餐饮中心巨头– 这似乎正走向一个竞争减少、约趋垄断的市场局面? 新加坡竞争与消费委员会的官网,对并购垄断的观点是这样的: ”竞争与消费委员会,透过推演并购、假设不并购可能出现的市场后果,来评估并购造成的影响,以及是否出现竞争减少到状态。“ 但我们想想,职总企业并购KOPITIAM,是否与不久前发生的私召车服务公司GRAB并购优步,有相似之处? 职总企业声明:并购符合职总社企的社会使命,确保提供民众可负担的熟食服务(9月21日报导)。可是据《网络公民》早前揭发,有小贩中心业者缴付近1千600租金之余,还要承担逾2千元的杂费。职总不应对外公布,此次并购究竟花了多少钱? 并购涉及公共利益 并购一事涉及公共利益,诚如研究蓄意散播假消息特委会的建议,如果涉公共利益事项选择不公开,政府(当中有许多工运议员)似乎有必要给个说法。 知名美食家司徒国辉在美食指南部落客”食尊“(Makansutra)揭露社会企业管理的小贩中心,却实行最为商业化的餐饮业管理模式。小贩除了租金还要缴交各种杂费,平均每月支出4千元,比新加坡知名麦士威小贩中心最高标价者,平均2-3千元的每月指出还要高。 司徒国辉也指出,职总富食客向摊位征收每月1千608元的租金,比起环境局管理的小贩中心平均1千514元的租金,稍微高些。…