Photos by New Naratif

On the New Naratif fortnightly podcast ‘Political Agenda’, Dr Thum Ping Tjin, historian and the publication’s Managing Director, discussed the state of the hawker industry in Singapore with three people in the business: the OG hawker Uncle Arthur who’s been hawking for decades, Lim Jialiang who’s been in the business for a few years now and relative newbie Yuting who only started last year.

The podcast conversation revolved around the challenges of being a hawker in Singapore from the perspective of those behind the stalls. The podcast provides a fresh perspective on the recent controversy surrounding hawker centres in Singapore.

One of the biggest issues on the hawker industry that has brought about much debate is the issue of prices and quality of food being provided at centres. There’s a general stereotype that the quality of the food is declining while prices are rising and neither hawkers nor patrons are particularly happy with the way things stand in the industry right now.

Arthur, who has been hawking since he was 10, notes that it’s not an easy job to be a hawker – it’s tough work, costs are rising, and customers are waning. Arthur said that many people are now taking shortcuts to stay cost effective while Jialing notes that many stalls now get their supplies from the same place, which is why food tends to taste the same in different stalls.

Yuting also added that running a hawker stall presents unique challenges that many people are unaware of such as having limited storage space which limits the amount of food they can sell per day. She says, “we’ve only two manpower and limited storage spaces. So there’s only so much we can do to earn our sales and revenue everyday.”

Moving on, they also discussed the issue of rent which has come up quite a few times these past few weeks. Apparently, hawkers like Arthur who has been in the business for decades pays rent at a much lower rate than newcomers. Of this, Jialiang said “like all good businessmen, we’ll not talk about how much our rents are, but I can safely say that Uncle Arthur’s rent is 25% of what I pay.”

They talked about the differences between a hawker centre and a food court – with the biggest difference being rental rates. Jialing talked about how the social enterprise model in hawker centres actually have rental schemes that are more like food courts. Yuting said that when she was considering renting a stall at the Pasir Ris Hawker centre which runs on a social enterprise model, the rates where exorbitant.

Yuting says “on top of the usual rental cleaning fee and such, we have a sales and marketing fee, plus a electronic cashless device monthly fee that we have to pay, and all this excludes GST. So you have to pay additional GST. And on top of that, we have to pay a fee to purchase the cutleries that are provided by the company itself, the social enterprise.” This makes it that much harder for any hawker to sustain their business. It was also pointed out that many of the hawkers at the Pasir Ris centre ended up closing shop after just three months.

Apart from the financial challenges that the social enterprise model presents, the group also talked about the role of the government in the current crisis, specifically how the government doesn’t consult actual hawkers before coming up with new policies for the industry. “So every few years they have a panel for hawkers, to talk about the hawker trade, and every single panel from the first—and now we’re at the third panel—none of them are hawkers. No single person sitting in that panel is a hawker,” said Jialiang.

Instead, they are factory owners, suppliers, and landlord. But no hawkers. That’s surprising to hear – how can the government hold a panel on the hawker industry without hearing input from hawkers themselves?

You can listen to the full podcast on New Naratif or read the transcript available on the page.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】病患曾到访女皇道购物中心健身房多次

卫生部指出,有冠状病毒19确诊病患曾到访樟宜机场第三搭客大厦的快餐店,更有确诊病患曾多次到访女皇道购物中心的健身房。 卫生部昨日(9月14日)发布文告,列出确诊病患曾到访过得新增地点和时段,并表示已向曾与确诊病患有亲密接触者发出通知。当局也促请曾于同一时段,和确诊病患到访同一地点的民众留意自身健康,若出现急性呼吸道感染症状、或发烧、味觉或嗅觉失灵,应尽快就医,并向医生坦承曾经到过的地点。 确诊病患曾到访的新增地点和时段如下: 9月1日晚上7时35分至9时:列大厦(Liat Tower)的Shake Shack汉堡店 9月3日晚上8时30分至9时30分、9月4日晚上8时40分至9时30分、9月6日晚上8时20分至9时30分、9月8日晚上8时25分至9时30分:女皇道购物中心(Queensway Shopping Centre)的Anytime Fitness健身房 9月6日晚上8时至8时55分:榜鹅水滨坊的Han’s咖啡屋 9月8日下午3时至4时15分:威城(West…

DPP: Budget needs to focus on positive and sustainable impact, long term challenges

By Democratic Progressive Party A country’s yearly Budget is not only about giving…

COVID-19: Two more SingPost employees tested positive for virus; cluster began when staff went to work while on medical leave

SingPost on Thu (2 April) confirmed that two more of its employees…

累积150起网购投诉 榴莲商品牌闹双包!

在冠状病毒19疫情期间,榴莲摊也提供网购服务,但正牌商家的品牌竟也出现“山寨”,而且两个品牌间的差别只是少了个“s”,使得顾客“错把冯京当马良”,累积150起针对投诉。 据《8days》报道指出,Durian Express Delivery网上商店于在2019年12月开始经营,但是和另一家较新的商店拥有相近的名字,Durians Express Delivery,多了个“s”字。两家店都有网上服务,且网址和商标都很接近,因此出现了不少乌龙事件。 正牌商家名誉受损 然而,当这些“搞错”的客户们在收到据说“烂”和“冷冻”的榴莲后,麻烦就开始了。少个“s”的榴莲商家Reece Lee(32岁)在接获民众抱怨时,倍感无辜,更因此导致名誉受损和失去客户信赖。 他指出,被误认为是恶劣商家,每天都要面对10到20个投诉,“如你所见,我们建立的形象都被(新店)毁掉了”。“对我们来说,开展业务和获得客户信赖并不容易,客户们必须信赖我们,才能在看到实物之前付款。但是这份信赖已经被人滥用了。” 商家列出了两家店的差别,包括其公司名称中的榴莲没有‘s’字母,商标也是用罗厘侧面,网站上的名字在脸书和Instagram是一样的。而Durians Express…