Comments
Online users slam MP Chan Chun Sing’s reasoning for bringing in more foreign talents
On Monday (6 January), Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing said in Parliament that Singapore cannot turn down investments that bring in foreign talents into the country because it will create higher-paying jobs for the current generation of Singaporeans, as well as for the future generations.
He added that the Government understands Singaporeans’ worries, but the country needs “above average” foreigners in order to create a more competitive economy.
Mr Chan expressed this in an attempt to dismiss concerns about foreigners taking away better-paying jobs from Singaporeans, particularly in the current situation of economic uncertainties.
In response to questions raised by Member of Parliament (MP) Liang Eng Hwa and Workers’ Party Chief Pritam Singh, Mr Chan guaranteed Singaporeans that the Government understands their concerns and worries. “We will walk this journey together with you. The Government will always have your back,” he said.
Despite Singaporeans’ concerns, Mr Chan said that foreign talents are needed to complement the local workforce.
“We know we need the above average foreigner to complement our domestic workforce so that we can build a more competitive economy and to provide better jobs and better pay for all Singaporeans,” he said.
He added, “But we also know that foreigners will compete with us and we need to provide some safeguards for our people.”
To explain his point, Mr Chan illustrated a situation where a new investment creates two new jobs, one paying S$7,000 and the other S$10,000.
However, a Singaporean who is currently earning S$5,000 will only be able to land the job that pays S$7,000 because he “does not yet have the skills or experience” for the S$10,000 paying job.
Although the Singaporean may feel frustrated as he feels that he is being unequally treated, not accepting the investment would mean the country loses both the S$7,000 and S$10,000 jobs, Mr Chan said.
If that’s not all, the Singaporean will also have fewer opportunities to rise to higher paying jobs and, more importantly, his children “will not be able to aspire to the S$7,000 or S$10,000”, he noted.
He added that this situation has had happened before in the 1970s where the first three semiconductor companies in Singapore – National Semiconductor, Fairchild and Texas Instruments – created more than 7,000 jobs.
“But our people did not get the best paying jobs immediately. Indeed many of our Pioneer and Merdeka generations worked under higher paying foreigners. At that point in time, we lacked the skills and experience to take the highest paying jobs but we did not reject these investments as a result,” he said.
He added, “We learned, we upgraded our capabilities..and in time we took over many of these higher paying jobs, including the better trained and educated children of the Pioneer and Merdeka generations.”
In fact, many of the early engineers and technicians became senior executives in the sector, and in return mentored a new generation of Singaporeans, Mr Chan said.
Today, the same situation is happening in the info-communications technology (ICT) and software industries, the MP noted.
“When global companies like Google, Grab and Facebook invest here, the reality is that we do not have enough Singaporeans with the relevant skills and experience to fill all the jobs they are going to create,” he said.
“So do we go out and attract these investments like Google, Grab and Facebook, not just for this generation but more importantly also for the next?” he asked.
“I say we do, and land the investment first,” he told the House.
He then emphasised that Singapore needs to train its people and upgrade their skills to take over the high-paying jobs soonest possible.
“But do not exploit sentiments to create envy, anger and frustration towards that foreigner who is now taking the $10,000 job.”
Upon hearing what Mr Chan said, many netizens slammed him for not knowing what he’s talking about.
Penning their thought on the Facebook page of Mothership, they said that Mr Chan doesn’t “have the skill for the million dollars job” and he is “trying so hard to confuse” the people with his figures. Some pointed out that his analogy is “terrible”, “irrelevant to the topic”, and that he is deliberately attempting to “misdirect, confuse and deceive the public” with it.
Some felt that Mr Chan is underestimating Singaporeans’ capabilities and they actually have the skills that will allow them to get the high-paying job. One user said that Singaporeans’ skills are in demand and opportunities are readily available for them in other cities with much lower cost of living. Some even questioned if Mr Chan is saying that “our education had failed for new job opportunity or business?”
Regina Hou explained that Singaporeans’ education and skills are “comparable” if not better, than other countries in the world. As such, she said “it upsets me listening to this when SGreans overseas are being recognised and lauded but not in our home country”.
She added, “The SG government has been very discouraging towards its own people, especially the fresh graduates”.
“To recognise qualifications and experience from some backwater villages in developing countries and say it is comparable and superior to our local standards is an insult to not just our people but education system and the government themselves.”
A number of online users stated that Mr Chan failed to know what is happening on the ground to give such an explanation, adding that he oblivious as many jobs in the country are filled by foreigners. They also explained that the scenario that he described is not realistic as “SME workers (90% of SGreans work) do not suddenly get a $7K MNC job”. They also added that
Comments
Netizens: 8World News anchor’s defence of Singapore’s success overlooked key domestic concerns
In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie, a news anchor from 8World News, defended Singapore’s achievements and countered foreign criticisms about its governance. While highlighting the nation’s success, Ms Zhang’s defence of the status quo was criticised by netizens for overlooking pressing issues like the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges faced by ordinary Singaporeans. Additionally, some questioned whether Singapore’s solutions could address similar problems in Western countries.
In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie (张海洁), a news anchor with Singapore’s state media 8World News, staunchly defended the country’s achievements while dismissing criticisms from abroad.
In the video published on 12 September, Ms Zhang highlighted the criticisms Singapore often faces from international human rights organizations and Western media, especially regarding the perceived lack of freedom in its governance.
She highlighted how Western countries view Singapore’s democracy as abundant but its freedom as limited, whereas from a Singaporean perspective, Western freedoms sometimes go too far, such as in the case of legal gun ownership in the U.S., which raises concerns about public safety.
Zhang pointed out that while Singapore is frequently criticised for its lack of free speech, authoritarianism, and harsh legal punishments like caning and fines, these critiques are often convenient narratives used to attack Singapore’s system.
She acknowledged that these perceptions are deeply ingrained but argued that Singapore’s success, both in terms of social stability and economic prosperity, speaks for itself.
“Singapore has its own way of defending democracy and freedom; Western-style democracy and freedom don’t apply to us, ” Ms Zhang said.
“As a tiny nation with nothing, we first have to survive before we can afford the luxury of pursuing freedom and democracy.”
In her talkshow, Ms Zhang highlighted a recent article by Graham Allison, a Harvard professor and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, published in Foreign Policy magazine.
The article, titled “What the West Can Learn From Singapore” poses a thought-provoking question: while Americans and Britons highly value freedoms like speech, press, and assembly, would they be willing to accept some limitations on these rights in exchange for the high standards of governance that Singaporeans enjoy?
Ms Zhang further highlighted that Singapore’s success is not merely the result of authoritarian governance, but stems from the fact that “Lee Kuan Yew and his nation-building team made the right decisions, even when they were difficult to understand or unpopular, which ultimately propelled Singapore to its current heights.”
Zhang cited the 1992 ban on chewing gum as an example, explaining that it was implemented to reduce societal costs and prevent vandalism on public property.
Although Singapore faced criticism for this decision—especially during U.S. negotiations—it reflected the country’s bold and pragmatic approach, she added.
Ms Zhang said despite external mockery, Singaporeans now view the ban as a success, showing how restrictions can lead to better living conditions.
She also referenced Lee Kuan Yew’s comment to the BBC, acknowledging that Singapore has been labeled a “nanny state.”
However, she argued that this governance model has fostered a more disciplined and livable society over the years.
Zhang emphasised “Uniquely Singapore” governance system, which is tailored to its specific needs and environment, including policies like the Certificate of Entitlement (COE), government housing, ERP, and a strong anti-corruption framework.
Nevertheless, Ms Zhang acknowledged that while the Western governance model has its advantages, especially in inclusivity, Singapore’s tailored system has proven effective for its unique circumstances.
Netizens criticise Ms Zhang for overlooking Singaporeans’ pressing concerns, lack of balance discussion
8World News is a Chinese digital portal under Mediacorp, a state-owned media company under Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek Holdings.
Despite the supportive comments on 8World News’s YouTube channel and Facebook page reflecting Ms Zhang’s defence of Singapore’s democracy and achievements, some netizens have pointed out that her arguments overlooked criticisms and concerns raised by ordinary Singaporeans.
These concerns include pressing issues such as the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges, which have been increasingly alarming for many on the ground.
A comment emphasised the importance of “press freedom” as a reflection of society, comparing it to the necessity of having a mirror in every household. He suggests that just as a mirror reflects one’s appearance, a free press reflects societal issues and concerns.
Netizen suggests 8World News seek diverse opinions on Singapore’s democracy
A YT user suggests that discussing the topic solely from one’s own perspective may not be suitable.
The user recommend that as an individual media platform, the best approach is to invite several guests to share their personal viewpoints, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions based on a range of opinions.
Netizen asked: Can Singapore’s solutions solve problems in the Western world?
Another comment questions the assertion that Western-style democracy is not applicable to Singapore by highlighting that Singapore’s system is built on parliamentary democracy, elections, a fair judiciary, and a neutral civil service.
These elements, the netizen argues, are essential to Singapore’s success and are not exclusive to Western models.
The netizen further argued that Singapore’s economic prosperity is rooted in the post-war world order led by the U.S., which promoted free trade and provided technology and capital from the West.
He then questions whether Singapore’s model could be applied to the UK or the US, noting that these countries have long histories of stable governance while Singapore is still in its early stages of development.
“The crises faced by the US and European societies are reactions to globalization, such as issues with immigration and unemployment due to industrial shifts. How has Singapore addressed these problems? ”
“For immigration, it firmly denies long-term residency to foreign workers. For unemployment caused by industrial shifts, it opened two casinos and developed the tourism and service industries. Do you think these solutions could be applied to the West? Can they resolve the West’s issues?” The netizen asked.
Rising living costs and employment challenges highlighted amidst growing concerns in Singapore
In recent years, there has been growing concern over rising living costs in Singapore, with many experiencing increased hardships due to policies that have driven up everyday expenses.
Escalating grocery prices, million-dollar HDB flats, and COE premiums exceeding S$100k set records, reinforcing Singapore’s tag as one of the world’s most expensive cities, surpassing even New York.
Last year, Singapore’s Workers’ Party proposed a motion urging structural changes to alleviate financial burdens on citizens, calling for measures to reduce living costs.
However, the ruling party’s proposed modifications to the motion, which the WP strongly opposed, were seen as diminishing the government’s responsibility to address these issues.
On 17 September, The Labour Market Report for Q2 2024, released by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower, revealed that all job growth was driven by non-resident workers, while resident employment declined by 600.
Time-related underemployment among residents rose to 2.2%. Of the retrenched residents, 55% found new jobs within six months, but 41.4% had to accept lower wages.
Only 32.2% of retrenched residents managed to secure jobs with similar or higher pay. Older workers, particularly those aged 50 to 59, faced the biggest challenges, with their re-employment rate dropping to 41.6%.
Non-resident workers continue to fill roles in sectors like Construction and Manufacturing, which struggle to attract local residents due to the physically demanding nature of these jobs and the rising cost of living.
Over half of Singaporeans polled consider relocating to Johor Bahru to escape high living costs
A recent survey by Singlife found that more than two in five Singaporeans believe they will never achieve financial freedom.
The poll, part of Singlife’s second Financial Freedom Index, reveals significant concerns about the financial future of Singaporeans and permanent residents.
According to the survey, 44% of respondents doubt they will ever reach financial freedom, citing major obstacles such as insufficient income (53%), unforeseen expenses (38%), job insecurity (32%), and debt repayment burdens (28%).
These factors have contributed to a drop in the overall Financial Freedom Index score, which fell from 60 in 2023 to 58 out of 100 in 2024.
As Singapore’s cost of living rises and concerns about retirement fund adequacy mount, an increasing number of residents are considering relocating to Malaysia, especially Johor Bahru (JB).
According to a recent poll by Answers.sg, which surveyed over 1,500 respondents, more than half expressed a willingness to move to JB to escape Singapore’s high living expenses.
Comments
Tan Kiat How: Police called after resident ‘became aggressive’ at meet-the-people session
Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How shared on TikTok that police were called to his meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok on Monday (17 Sept) evening after a resident ‘became a little more aggressive’, reportedly over a job issue. While the PAP MP emphasized the efforts made to assist residents, some netizens questioned the volunteers’ handling of the situation and urged more proactive measures from the MP.
SINGAPORE: Police were called to a meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok after a resident became aggressive, causing a disturbance, according to Member of Parliament (MP) for East Coast GRC Tan Kiat How.
Mr Tan, who represents the Kampong Chai Chee ward, addressed the incident in a TikTok video posted on Monday (17 September).
In the video, Mr Tan, who is also Senior Minister of State for National Development, emphasised the need for mutual respect at these sessions, which are intended to be safe spaces for both residents and volunteers.
“It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive,” Mr Tan said, acknowledging the incident that occurred during the Monday MPS session at Block 408 Bedok North Avenue 2.
Mr Tan expressed empathy for the challenges faced by residents but urged individuals attending MPS to remain respectful towards volunteers.
“Sometimes you see such cases at MPS, where one of the residents get more aggressive and can be a little bit more violent,” he noted.
He added that while efforts are made to assist residents, certain matters are beyond their control.
“For example, we can’t write to a government agency to demand the agency to offer a job to a person … but we can facilitate and make sure that opportunities are available for our residents,” he explained.
@tankiathow It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to #MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive. We always do our best to help #KampongChaiChee residents, but some things are beyond our control. Let’s work towards mutual respect and ensure MPS remains a safe space for both residents and volunteers. #caringeastcoast
Netizens Question Volunteers’ Handling of Situation and Call for Greater Action from MP
The incident drew numerous responses on TikTok, with some expressing support for Mr Tan and others sympathising with the unnamed resident.
One comment suggested that the individual may have been “desperate” for a solution to their issue, while another urged patience, noting that not all cases can be resolved immediately.
Separately, Mr Tan responded to one user by confirming that he had previously helped the resident’s parents.
Some questioned whether the issue arose from a lack of tact by certain volunteers in handling the situation, suggesting that they receive proper training to address residents’ concerns effectively.
In response, Mr Tan emphasized that his volunteers always do their best and that empathy is crucial in such situations.
Another user noted that empathy should be mutual, suggesting that while residents are trying their best, they may feel they have no other solutions, urging Mr Tan to show greater understanding.
One comment pointed out that something significant might have affected the resident, possibly leading them to drastic actions, and called for more proactive measures from the MP rather than just expressing empathy.
This is not the first time an MPS has been marked by aggression.
In 2018, Jurong GRC MP Tan Wu Meng was assaulted by a 32-year-old man, leaving him with injuries.
The assailant was arrested after rushing into the MPS area and attacking Dr Tan.
Similarly, in 2009, Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Seng Han Thong was attacked when a resident doused him with paint thinner and set him on fire. Mr Seng survived but required extensive medical treatment.
-
Singapore7 days ago
Minister K Shanmugam transfers Astrid Hill GCB to UBS Trustees for S$88 Million following Ridout Road controversy
-
Politics4 days ago
Dr Tan Cheng Bock questions S$335 million Founders’ Memorial cost, citing Lee Kuan Yew’s stance
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Parliament1 week ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Diplomacy2 weeks ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Parliament1 week ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics2 weeks ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Politics2 days ago
Lee Hsien Loong warns of limited political space if election margins narrow