Source: Google map screengrab.

The Ministry of Manpower has issued three Correction Directions (CD) under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) to online postings by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).
The three posts are:

  1. A sponsored Facebook post on 2 Dec 2019,
  2. a post on the SDP Facebook page on 30 Nov 2019,
  3. and an article on the SDP website on 8 Jun 2019.

The CDs will require SDP to carry a correction notice stating that its sponsored Facebook post, the post on its Facebook page, as well as the article on its website, contain a misleading graphic and false statement of facts.
A statement containing the corrections ordered by MOM, has already been published on government website, Factually.
The ministry claims that the graphical illustration depicting that plunging local PMET employment featured in SDP’s sponsored Facebook post on 2 Dec, is wrong.

Image posted by SDP
MOM pointed to its Comprehensive Labour Force Survey which showed a steady rise of local PMETs employment since 2015.
However, TOC would like our readers to note that the figures of local PMETs include Permanent Residents and the results are based on the survey with 33,000 Households.
Comprehensive Labour Force Survey
MOM also took issue with a statement in an article, “SDP Population Policy: Hire S’poreans First, Retrench S’poreans last”, published on SDP’s website on 8 June. The statement wrote, “The SDP’s proposal comes amidst a rising proportion of Singaporean PMETs getting retrenched”.
MOM claims that this statement is also wrong as there is no rising trend of local PMET retrenchments.
It noted that the number of local PMETs retrenched in 2018 was, in fact, the lowest since 2014. Local PMETs retrenched as a proportion of all local PMET employees, has also declined since 2015, said MOM.
However, TOC would like our readers to also note that there is a practice called, ‘disguised retrenchments’. An example is the incident with Surbana Jurong in 2017, where employees were made to choose between two letters;  a letter of termination and a letter of resignation. Those who were still of employable age were compelled to take up the option of resignation letter as a termination will leave a bad mark on their employment history.
MOM claims that SDP’s statements seek to mislead Singaporeans
According to MOM, the Singapore economy is continuing to create jobs despite the economic headwinds. It emphasised that local PMET employment has increased consistently and there is no rising trend of retrenchment, whether amongst PMETs or otherwise.
It went on to state that the alleged false and misleading statements by the SDP have a singular objective, which is to stoke fear and anxiety among local PMETs.
It is important to set the facts straight so that Singaporeans are not misled, said MOM.
SDP has said it is looking into the directions. If it does not comply with the correction orders, the party may be subjected to a fine of not exceeding $500,000.
This is the third corrective order issued by the government so far since POFMA came into force.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

India’s taxi app Ola backed by GIC and Temasek loses its licence to operate in London

The BBC reported on Sunday (4 Oct) that London’s transport authority, Transport…

被要求把头巾取下 锡克教徒摄影师揭发遭无礼歧视

一名锡克教徒的摄影师,准备会见业务上的主办单位,但是代理商却要求他,可否在会面之前拆除头巾。 这名摄影师帕维达星(Parvitar Singh)昨日(7月20日)在脸书帖文,指出一名女代理人对他做出无礼和具种族歧视的要求。 他指出,他是因为业务需求而向一家代理商做出申请,但是代理人却将他的头巾暗喻为“杂物”,并希望他将头巾取下。当帕维达星表示无法取下时,代理表示“不确定这样是否会引起发起人的不满”。 帕维达星则反驳女代理,我国宪法下保障的公民权益,包括允许他作为新加坡公民,戴着头巾生活和工作。他之后也表示会就此事报警,确保不会再有人因此而被歧视。 很多评论者对他的经历表示震惊,并且赞成他报警之举。 他之后在昨日下午2时发帖跟新情况,表示他已经寻求法律途径,并要求相关公司的发起人在24小时内道歉,并交代会对女代理所采取的行动。 接着在晚上10时许,帕维达星再次帖文跟新有关事项,他表示相关公司已和他取得联系,已经着手调查此事,希望他能够给予多些时间和空间。 对此,帕维达星指出,他在过去五年一直都积极参与信仰活动,并致力于建立更团结的社会,让社会中的各种族和宗教团体彼此了解。 他表示,此次事件让他想起了在成为锡克教徒后,面对了不少的歧视、种族主义和偏见。“作为新加坡的少数民族,从来都不是容易的事,甚至有人针对我的头巾说事。” 他强调,公布有关事件并没为了针对任何人或公司,旨在提醒民众我国仍然有这些歧视现象出现,因此选择不透露公司和代理名字。他并不希望有关帖文导致相关单位或人士被抹黑,或影响他们的生活、生计,甚至是家人。“我坚信给予第二次机会、救赎和宽恕。” 他也感谢民众所给予的支持和鼓励,甚至给予他可采取行动的建议。“让我们一起携手捍卫和平、团结的新加坡。”

对王瑞杰动议“感到不舒服” 官委议员王丽婷、特斯拉弃权表决

官委议员王丽婷和特斯拉博士也参与王瑞杰动议的辩论,他们虽认同议员应维持高标准诚信,惟质疑是否有通过此动议的必要。基于动议无法分项表决,他们只得放弃表决权。 副总理王瑞杰提呈的动议分为两大部分,第一点重申国会议员应维持高标准的诚信和责任感。 第二部分提及此前高庭对阿裕尼后港市镇会诉讼的判决,指林瑞莲和刘程强行为不诚实、有违受托责任,应该回避一切阿裕尼—后港市镇理事会相关的财政事务。 在辩论中,王丽婷先是认同议员需保持高度诚信的原则,但也质疑有关动议的动机,指动议即无法律效益,再者《市镇会法》也已赋予部长权力,可要求阿裕尼-后港市镇会采取必要行动处理不当行为。(参考市镇会法43D项) 在国会讨论法庭诉讼“感不舒服” 再者,他也提及在国会讨论法庭的诉讼个案感到“不舒服”(uncomfortable),再者工人党议员林瑞莲已表明将上诉,故此即便有议员发言免责的权限,仍恐有“藐视法庭”之嫌,干预司法程序。 特斯拉博士提及,此前法庭判决虽指林瑞莲等人,由于无法与前管理公司合作,而未招标即委任FMSS公司管理市镇会事务,有欠妥当;但他指出,根据判决他也未看见有任何证明,当事者是为了个人利益动机这么做。 市镇会实为“政治性的机构”,由民选议员领导,上述动议要求工人党采取行动,动议本身就已涉及政治解决的作用。 故此,尽管他认同议员需保持高道德标准原则, 但以非民选的官委议员身份,去参与表决具有政治意味的动议,同样令他感到不舒服。

Housing Singapore

The following is an article by Very Fine Commentary posted on 7…