The following is an article by Very Fine Commentary posted on 7 February 2011.

by Hou Shi Hang

Free market or government intervention? It depends on your priorities.

Despite the strong stance of the Washington Consensus against government intervention, it is not a logical inevitability that governments will mess up the distribution of goods and services. It is merely a tendency that governments generate a degree of inefficiency. Inefficiency is not in itself a condemnation, while efficiency should be seen as an advantage rather than a definitive end, as there are inevitably other social goals that must be considered. Similarly, the efficiency of the free market is not proof that it is the “correct” method of economic distribution.

My Waterway at Punggol (HDB)

One good example of this principle is the Singaporean housing system. In most countries, the housing market is dominated by the free market. The government usually acts to supplement the market by providing for low-income households, or to promote home-ownership through legislation or housing subsidy. Unlike most other countries, Singapore does not emphasise the role of the free market in the provision and distribution of flats. For new flats, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) has relied on queuing, and, since 2002, the Built-To-Order ballot system. This is highly reminiscent of the heyday of central planning. The rationale for indulging in central planning in this case is to avoid price volatility in the housing market and to make sure low-income households are not left out. This is an attempt to “legitimise” the market by making the prices more palatable to low income groups. The high degree of control the government wields also allows it to use housing policy for social ends; the government incentivises marriage by making new HDB flats eligible only for married couples or two or more singles above 35. Similarly, HDB flats have to abide by an ethnic integration policy and maintain a certain ethnic ratio, all in the name of maintaining racial integration.

To continue reading, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“Count on me, Singapore” turned into spiritual song in India and sold for US$0.50 per download

Singapore’s national song, “Count on me, Singapore”, appears to be very popular…

Netizens sympathise cabbie who was begging traffic wardens not to fine him for smoking in taxi

On Thursday (3 October), a photo of a taxi driver kneeling and…

振瑞路铁锅烧尸案:各机构单位对孩子失踪”并不起疑“

振瑞路铁锅烧尸案曾和多个社区组织和援助机构有过接触,据当时访视社工与相关官员与涉案家庭的接触,他们并不曾怀疑过孩子已失踪或可能面临生命危险。 社会及家庭发展部部长李智陞昨日(7日)在国会期间,针对案件作出回应,该涉案家庭已有不同的政府单位与民间机构接触,为该家庭提供经济援助、家庭福利以及儿童保育问题如学前教育等。 根据《亚洲新闻台》报导,李智陞也指出,教育部也有数项针对无法提供孩子登记小学一年级的措施,向这些家长伸出援手,除了发出通知信以外,亦会派遣官员前往家庭访视。他强调,如果孩子并不是和家长同住一屋檐下,教育部也会联络各个机构试图与孩子所寄住的家庭联络。 “该涉案家庭表示,他的孩子目前交由亲友照顾,而且一个两岁的孩子通常都不会是和机构互动的对象。” 李智陞也表示,目前已交由法庭处理,正在进行刑事诉讼调查,因此不便透露该案详情。另外,针对该涉案夫妻仍有其他孩子一事,该如何处置,李智陞表示社会及家庭发展部会持续提供孩子们的资源,确保他们的安全与福利能够被保障。 振瑞路铁锅烧尸案曝光后震惊社会,两名男女涉嫌于2014年3月在振瑞路的一个组屋单位,谋杀当时年仅两岁半的女童,嫌凶是女童的亲生父母。当时该单位传出浓烈的臭味,警方在接获通报后,发现厨房的铁锅中装有一具尸骸,骨骸几乎已经烧成灰烬。 警方在初步调查以为尸骸是一个胚胎,但其后证实死者是一名两岁半的女童,可能已经死亡超过五年,而涉案凶手是女童的亲生父母(男三十一岁,女三十岁),为保护受害人与家属身份,法庭已发出限制令,禁止报道被告身份。 目前两名被告已被还押,正接受精神鉴定,而其母亲则因毒品与盗窃相关罪行被判处五年两个月的监禁。

Kitchen floor tiles in a Toa Payoh HDB flat began emitting popping sounds before cracking open

On a Sunday afternoon (21 March), a Singaporean woman and her mother…