• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Laid off workers of Surbana Jurong given two letters to choose from, letter of termination and letter of resignation

by Terry Xu
17/01/2017
in Current Affairs, Labour
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0

Workers who were dismissed by Surbana Jurong for “poor performance” have shared with The Online Citizen that they were given two letters to choose from after meeting their Human Resource department on Friday, 6 January. They had to make a Hobson’s choice between a letter of termination and a letter of resignation.

Surbana Jurong Private Limited or Surbana Jurong is a newly merged entity that is a combination of Surbana International Consultants and Jurong International Holdings in 2015.

Surbana International Consultants was formerly the Building and Development Division in Singapore’s Housing and Development Board which was formed in 1960, which was then corporatised as HDBCorp in 2003 and acquired by Temasek Holdings in 2004.

Just last week, Straits Times reported that a bunch of workers were laid off by Surbana Jurong and its spokesman said that less than 0.5 per cent of its global 13,000-strong workforce had been affected.

As the meetings were held at different locations, the workers are unsure of the exact number of fellow workers who are also dismissed. We can only estimate the number of workers affected by the dismissal through the company spokesman’s rough estimate.  The number of affected workers is in the “dozens” up to as many as 65 workers as it employs about 3,000 workers locally.

Despite the number of workers being laid-off, the company spokesman was quoted to have said that the dismissal is not a retrenchment exercise but “rather, a small number of poor performers were communicated with and released”

According to workers who spoke to TOC on condition of anonymity, said that they were informed on 5 January (Thursday) to meet with the HR department on Friday, the following day at 5.30pm. There was no mention of what the meeting was about.

At the meetings which were held in the respective departments, the workers are handed two letters each, a letter of termination and a letter of resignation for them to choose. All they need to do is to sign on the resignation letter for it to take effect. If one does not take the option of resignation, the company will then serve the letter of termination to the worker.

Those who were still of employable age were compelled to take up the option of resignation letter as a termination will leave a bad mark on their employment history. However, those who were over the age of 62 did not accept their dismissal and took the issue to union officials and the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).

According to ST’s report, workers were then represented by the Singapore Industrial and Services Employees’ Union and the Building Construction and Timber Industries Employees’ Union (Batu), both affiliated to NTUC.

The two unions said 18 union members were affected and their re- employment contracts were prematurely terminated.

Under the Retirement and Re-employment Act (RRA), the minimum retirement age is 62 years. Employers are not allowed to dismiss any employee below this age because of the employee’s age. Employers must offer re-employment to eligible employees who turn 62, up to age 65, to continue their employment in the organisation.

The potential loss in retrenchment benefits for workers

From 1 April 2015, an employee who has been employed in a company for at least two years, can request for retrenchment benefits if he or she is retrenched.

Retrenchments are defined as dismissal on the ground of redundancy or by reason of any reorganisation of the employer’s profession, business, trade or work. This applies to permanent employees, as well as contract workers with full contract terms of at least 6 months.

According to the workers, those who are of the age of 62 and above have been working in the company for twenty years or more, back when the company was still a statutory board under HDB.

Starting from 1 January 2017, employers must notify MOM of retrenchments within 5 working days after they notify the affected employees. MOM’s website further states that it is mandatory for employers with at least 10 employees who have retrenched 5 or more employees within any 6-month period to notify MOM of the retrenchment exercise. For those who have served five years or more, MOM stipulates that the staff be given a notice period of 4 weeks or more.

While the Employment Act does not dictate the nature or amount of such benefits and leaves it to the mutual agreement between the employee and the employer. The common practice in Singapore is to pay between 2 weeks’ to one month’s salary per year of service. This would mean a sizeable amount of retrenchment benefits that the company would have to pay out to the staff if it had label its dismissals as a retrenchment exercise.

Totally unfair for dismissed workers

Peter (not his real name), one of those who were affected by the disguised retrenchment, said that it is ridiculous for the company to do such a thing upon to workers who have been slogging for the company.

He voiced his displeasure over the statement by the company, “It is irresponsible for the company to say that the dismissed were underperforming, how can they look for a job after such news go out?” and said that if underperformance was the issue, there should have been a period of time where the employee can address the issues that the company have with him or her and not to terminate one’s service without any prior warning.

In fact, that was exactly what happened to him when his job offer failed to materialise after the statement about its laid-off workers by Surbana Jurong got out. He was supposed to receive an official confirmation of his new job just this week.

Peter further noted that the company is heartless to have made such a move given that it is nearing the Chinese New Year Festival.

However, workers are too scared to voice against the company or be identified to be speaking to the press as they feel that they have no means of seeking redress against the company’s actions.

Union and MOM keeping quiet over disguised retrenchment exercise?

In October last year, NTUC expressed concerns that employers were disguising retrenchments to circumventure labour laws. One such modus of operation listed by NTUC is terminating with poor performance cited as a reason, a curious sign of a disguised retrenchment is when the poor performance rating comes abruptly following a consistently good ratings.

In ST’s report, Batu was quoted to have said that the unions are working with Surbana on how to help the affected union members and that it is still talking with the company. TOC has since written to the union about the claims and it has yet replied. But if Batu is hearing the same thing that TOC is hearing, why is the union keeping quiet about the actions by the company and whose interest is the union and NTUC looking after?

Mr Leong Sze Hian has noted in his article that the number of dismissed workers and the workers seeking help with the unions do not match. TOC understands that is because the staff that have been dismissed are not all union workers as some are not covered under the employment act due to their executive role in the company.

However, does it mean that MOM and the unions do not voice out for their unfair treatment as they are not covered the employment act? What happened to Singaporean First?

What will MOM, unions, Ministers and MPs do?

Back in September 2016, Minister of Manpower, Lim Swee Say said in response to questions by Mr Patrick Tay, MP of West Coast GRC:

“Affected employees who encounter irresponsible retrenchment practices not in compliance with the Employment Act can approach MOM for assistance. Those not covered by the Act can approach their unions if they are union members. For non-union members, if their contract stipulates a notice period or the retrenchment benefits quantum, they have recourse through the Civil Courts. And with the setting up of the Employment Claims Tribunals in April 2017, they will have a more affordable and expeditious avenue to resolve their contractual disputes including retrenchment benefits.”

But so far TOC’s query to MOM about the treatment towards to workers has been ignored.

Given that Surbana Jurong is jointly owned by Temasek Holdings and JTC Corp in a 51-49 partnership. Will MOM, unions, labour Ministers and the MPs do anything about the apparent injustice to the workers despite the uncomfortable confrontation with a state-owned company?

And what kind of example is the company giving with such labour practices?

Minister Lim also said in Parliament on November last year that there is no evidence of irresponsible retrenchment.

There is no clear evidence that irresponsible retrenchment is on the rise. Under the Employment Act, an employee who has served less than 2 years is not entitled to retrenchment benefits. For those who have served more than 2 years, payment of retrenchment benefits is mandatory if it is specified in their individual employment contracts or the collective agreements negotiated by their unions.
Even so, based on the last survey conducted in 2013, 9 out of 10 companies with more than 25 employees do pay retrenchment benefits. The prevailing norm then was 2 weeks to 1 month of salary for each year of service. We are now conducting another survey and findings will be ready by end of the year.

Does it mean that 1 out of 10 companies is a state-owned company?

TOC has written to the company on the claims by the workers on 15 Jan and yet to receive any form of response. We will include the company’s reply once they respond.

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.

Related Posts

AFP

India’s Modi hits back at opposition after Adani furore

08/02/2023
Pritam Singh’s speech on HDB affordability and accessibility
Politics

Pritam Singh’s speech on HDB affordability and accessibility

08/02/2023
Taiwan 34th Lantern Festival celebration signifies return to pre-pandemic normalcy
Arts & Culture

Taiwan 34th Lantern Festival celebration signifies return to pre-pandemic normalcy

08/02/2023
Six dead and eight injured in accident at Genting Highlands
Malaysia

Six dead and eight injured in accident at Genting Highlands

08/02/2023
Labour

Close to 70% of working Singaporeans above age of 65 earns less than S$2,500 a month

08/02/2023
Minister K Shanmugam appears to lack understanding of case where judge found bodycam footage debunked police officers’ sworn affidavits
Politics

Police investigations into conduct of WP’s Pritam Singh and Faisal Manap still ongoing: K Shanmugam

08/02/2023
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
Connect withD
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

India’s Modi hits back at opposition after Adani furore

08/02/2023
Pritam Singh’s speech on HDB affordability and accessibility

Pritam Singh’s speech on HDB affordability and accessibility

08/02/2023
Taiwan 34th Lantern Festival celebration signifies return to pre-pandemic normalcy

Taiwan 34th Lantern Festival celebration signifies return to pre-pandemic normalcy

08/02/2023
Six dead and eight injured in accident at Genting Highlands

Six dead and eight injured in accident at Genting Highlands

08/02/2023

Close to 70% of working Singaporeans above age of 65 earns less than S$2,500 a month

08/02/2023
Minister K Shanmugam appears to lack understanding of case where judge found bodycam footage debunked police officers’ sworn affidavits

Police investigations into conduct of WP’s Pritam Singh and Faisal Manap still ongoing: K Shanmugam

08/02/2023
Malaysia’s seven-time Asean Para Games champion seen selling tissues at Bukit Bintang

Malaysia’s seven-time Asean Para Games champion seen selling tissues at Bukit Bintang

08/02/2023
53-year-old Singaporean worker dies after glass doors topple on him, fourth workplace fatality in 2023

53-year-old Singaporean worker dies after glass doors topple on him, fourth workplace fatality in 2023

08/02/2023

Trending posts

Cognizant India transfers staff to work in Singapore as recently as this year

Local IT grads can’t find jobs while engineers constantly transferred from India to work in SG under CECA

by Correspondent
05/02/2023
113

...

No response from Josephine Teo on whether Mediacorp has been instructed to stop coverage of SMT circulation scandal

No response from Josephine Teo over alleged blackout of coverage by Mediacorp over SMT circulation scandal

by Terry Xu
06/02/2023
13

...

Adani’s brother runs SG company and registers as director with local ID

Adani’s brother runs SG company and registers as director with local ID

by Correspondent
03/02/2023
26

...

Japanese-Canadian junior high school girl breaks national record with 3km in 9:02 mins

“I want my normal life back,” Sherry Drury withdraws from National Junior High School Tournament due to overheated public attention

by Yee Loon
06/02/2023
4

...

They have done a fine job of confusing us about the jobs situation

They have done a fine job of confusing us about the jobs situation

by Augustine Low
01/02/2023
48

...

19-year-old delivery rider in China covers 5km in 22 minutes to deliver antivenom to woman who had bitten by snake

19-year-old delivery rider in China covers 5km in 22 minutes to deliver antivenom to woman who had bitten by snake

by Yee Loon
06/02/2023
5

...

January 2017
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Dec   Feb »

The Online Citizen is a regional online publication based in Taiwan and formerly Singapore’s longest-running independent online media platform.

Navigation

  • Editorial
  • Commentaries
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Community

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Letter submission
  • Membership subscription

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2022 - 2023 The Online Citizen Asia

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2022 - 2023 The Online Citizen Asia

wpDiscuz