On Thursday (5 December), political activist Brad Bowyer took to his Facebook to share his thoughts on how the People’s Action Party (PAP) is building more “legal walls to defend itself”.
In his post, Mr Bowyer who is currently a Progress Singapore Party member shared an article that was originally published in the Straits Times (ST) 7 years ago when he was still attached to PAP as a volunteer.
The ST article talked about why he got involved into politics and what he hoped to improve. “It gets to a point where you realise the world you live in is what you make of it. If you’ve got the ability to do something, you have a responsibility to do so.”
“I’d like my country to evolve by evolution, not revolution, and I was hoping I could play my part to make it a smoother transition,” he said.
However, in his latest post, Mr Bowyer mentioned that he decided to re-share the ST article for two main points.
The first being that his goals for the country have not changed at all, but he believes that PAP will not help him achieve it as the Party has strayed far from their roots.
“First my goals for Singapore have not changed just that I no longer have any illusion that they can be realised under the PAP flag as they have strayed so far from their roots and are apparently accelerating even faster away from the mass of Singaporeans in their actions regardless of rhetoric claiming otherwise,” he wrote.
Secondly, he also stated that the phrase “change by evolution not revolution” which he said in the ST article is “almost word for word what Dr Tan Cheng Bock said during the launch of Progress Singapore Party earlier this year”.
He also went on to say that the people of Singapore will eventually feel like they have “no democratic means to redress” what the ruling party is doing as they are continuously building more and more “legal walls to defend itself and imposes its will further on the people”.
One of the legal walls that Mr Bowyer mentioned is the latest “assault on the social media space”, which he’s seemingly implying the controversial Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).
The political activist was the first person in Singapore who was asked by the government under the Protection against Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) to post a correction on a Facebook post he published on 13 November.
Given all these, Mr Bowyer said that people should use their democratic rights to change the way the ruling party is leading the country, so that the situation in Hong Kong does not happen here.
“We don’t want a Hong Kong situation to ever develop here so please, while there still are alternatives, use your democratic rights as a citizen wisely and change the path we are being driven on before it reaches the tipping point,” he wrote.
He added, “When a government can’t stand on its own record but needs the past, fear, unjust laws and psychological games to hold its ground it no longer has a legitimacy and is only one step away from the final solution, force, to keep its power”.
As such, he asserted that Singaporeans must wise up if the PAP fails to do so.
“If the PAP will not wise up to where we are going then we must or Singapore could once again fall as it has done several times in its 700 year plus recorded history and this time it may not come back because the world is moving on and our luck of geography won’t be enough to save us this time.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Public consumption of liquor to be restricted

If the new Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Bill is passed in…

A simple solution of more drains for less floods?

By Terry Xu Yesterday morning’s heavy storm brought more than 100 mm…

Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam to be Acting Prime Minister during PM visit to Beijing

Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Deputy Prime Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for Economic and…

“法律不问琐事”? 范国瀚陈两裕    因脸书贴文被控藐视法庭

法律有句名言“法律不问琐事”(拉丁语:de minimis non curat lex),意即法律不过问对社会、他人财产、性命安危构成威胁和损害的事项。不过,在我国就有社运人士,却因为一则只有33个赞的脸书贴文招惹官司,在司法(保护)法令下,被提控藐视法庭罪。 总检察署高级政府律师在本月17日,在针对社运份子范国瀚和民主党副主席陈两裕的公开审讯时,认为脸书贴文是否构成藐视法庭,取决于一般民众如何诠释该贴文内容,而不是依据作者原意图。 范国瀚是在今年4月,于脸书的贴文称,马来西亚法庭处理政治个案比新加坡司法更独立,而被总检察署指控藐视法庭。有关贴文也转载新闻:“《当今大马》挑战反假新闻法违宪”。 随后,新加坡民主党党要陈两裕在脸书为范国瀚抱不平,指出总检察署的举措,更加证实范国瀚的批评所言不虚。结果也同样被控藐视法庭罪。不过,至今两人都仍未撤下被指藐视法庭的贴文。 2016年司法(保护)法令自去年10月生效,上述两人“抢了头香”,成为该法令生效以来首两位被指控藐视法庭的个案。 高级政府律师Francis Ng声明,范国瀚“没有可想象的理据”去挑出新加坡司法独立性的问题,范的言论等同向一般民众影射在马国进行的宪法挑战,若发生在新加坡必然败诉,是因为这里缺乏司法独立性。 “范国瀚是在质疑新加坡司法系统的公正与廉洁度。”…