Singapore Airlines A-380 taking off at Terminal A of Zurich Airport on September 8, 2018 in Zurich, Switzerland. (Image by Fedor Selivanov / Shutterstock.com)

A passenger on Singapore Airlines (SIA) flying from Singapore to Delhi took to Facebook on Sunday (1 December) to slam the airline for its “pathetic preparedness and service” after the flight was delayed for 16 hours.
Facebook user Deep Roy wrote a lengthy post on SIA’s Facebook page describing the “inhuman torture” he experienced on 29 November when the SIA flight that was due to depart from Singapore at 4.25 pm was delayed.

First, the flight was delayed for a couple of hours due to rain. Passengers had already boarded the plane at this time and were inside the cabin for more than an hour, said Mr Roy, adding that it had become “terribly hot without AC”.
Just as the plane was about to take off, the passengers were told that there was a problem with the braking mechanism. The plane headed back to the terminal where the passengers disembarked.
Mr Roy said the estimated time of departure was moved first to 8.50pm and then 11.30pm when the engineers discovered that they needed to replace a faulty brake pump.
As the passengers were waiting in the airport, they were offered some credit for food.
Mr Roy said, “We were just offered a measly SGD 15 credit for getting some dinner as the SQ staff refused to take out the meals from the aircraft that we were supposed to have been given had we been airborne.”
Later at 11.00pm, passengers boarded the plane for a second time after being informed that the test run was successful. Unfortunately, just before take-off again, there was another problem with the braking mechanism. Passengers were again asked to disembark and return to the terminal. This was around 1 am the next morning.
Mr Roy explained, “When we insisted that we did not want to get into the same plane again as it was clearly unsafe, they told us they did not have any other A380 planes available, even though we were in Singapore which was their Hub and they are the National Carrier!”
He continued, “They also refused to provide any hotel accommodation claiming all hotels were full (which was established to be a blatant lie). Their Ground Staff Executives kept feeding us one lie after another and did not show any concern for the problems we were facing!”
The irate passenger then said that the airline eventually arranged for some sandwiches, tea and coffee after “continuous yelling and protests”.
They were also later informed that they would be put on a different A380 that was flying in from Melbourne that morning.
“We finally boarded the new plane (our THIRD BOARDING) which eventually took off around 9:00 am SGP Time and reached New Delhi around 12:00 pm India Time after more than 16 HOURS DELAY! “
Mr Roy added, “Thankfully this time we did not have any braking problems!! At this time, we were all just relieved to finally get back home after this relentless & inhuman torture!”
He lamented that the delay caused him to miss his child’s award ceremony.
He said, “Despite charging much higher fares, Singapore Airlines demonstrated pathetic preparedness and service! This ordeal made one thing very clear to me & all my co-passengers – #NeverEverFlySingaporeAirlines!!”
Mr Roy ended his post with a demand for a full refund and an unconditional apology from SIA.
Other passengers on the same flight chimed in as well, adding that the SIA team was “unprofessional” and described the ordeal as “torture”.



However, other netizens commenting on Mr Roy’s post, mostly Singaporeans, jumped in to support the Airline and ask him to “stop complaining” and be thankful that he arrived safely despite the delays.
Many pointed out that they would rather be safe than sorry and praise SIA for putting safety first:







One person noted that delays are inevitable, no matter the airline She also acknowledged that a 16-hour delay is mentally draining but added that SIA managed to get passengers to arrive at their destination safely, which is the most important thing.

One person shared their own experience of a delayed flight with SIA, saying that the problem was in “poor communication” and the ground staff’s handling of the situation.

One person called for compassion, asking other commenters to put themselves in Mr Roy’s shoes and think about moments when they were upset and took to Facebook to rant about unhappy experiences.

SIA has won the title of World’s Best Airline in the Skytrax World Airline Awards four times including in 2018 and has been consistently ranked in the top 3 for the past 12 years. However, it was knocked off the top in 2019 by Qatar Airways which reclaimed the top spot.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

连氏基金长期护理研究(2)– 终身护保索赔条件严苛 学者:依级别赔付扩大安全网

连氏基金会和国立大学社会科学研究所两位助理教授何琳贻和黄瑞莲,针对我国长期护理前景进行研究。 除了昨日《海峡时报》所报导,强调更多年长者选择居家或中心式看护服务,且成本高昂,显示有必要提升现有社会保障机制。有关研究报告也针对现有医疗保健政策提供建议,特别呼吁应改善终身护保计划(CareShield Life)的受保赔付条件,让保户获得较广泛的保障。 报告列举出一些新的看护政策或计划逐步涌现,例如整合式居家和日顾计划(IHDC),让那些无法离开住家的年长者,中心能暂时派看护人员到家服务,至于那些在家护理者,则被鼓励在行动便利下能转移到中心接受看护。 至于“活跃乐龄中心”也在新的公共组屋区提供整合式乐龄看护服务,例如日顾、复健和代送日用品等。 “近年来,私人领域填补了乐龄看护领域的空洞,特别是针对想获得更多元和专属服务的中产和中上阶级。自愿福利组织也开始与私人业者合作。” 该研究发现,缔造获颁关系是实现规模经济和专业化的有效手段,同时也能落实提供全方位和持续性服务的目标。研究也认为,社会与家庭发展部把社会关怀任务,转交给卫生声部,使得看护领域获得更集中的规划和精简化,有望使该领域受惠。 研究报告欢迎政府推出终身护保计划,在应对长期护理成本日益攀升,提供民众保障。然而研究也点出其问题,包括终身健保符合赔付的条件严苛、相对较低的保赔和妇女需支付出更高保费。 去年仅6.6巴仙长者严重伤残 保户需符合严重伤残资格,即日常起居至少三项无法自理,才能领取每月600新元的赔付。然而,报告指出在2017年,只有6.6巴仙长者—约3万4千人面临严重伤残情况。这意味着,有大部分人都在符合申请赔付的范围外。 Elaine Ho指出,许多新加坡人的长期护理可能面对保障不足。在2017年,有三分之一年龄介于40至84岁人士,仍未购买基础乐龄健保(ElderShield)。…

Anguish in lack of help as Sabah quake confirms victims

Updates from the Ministry of Education at on 8 June, 12.20pm: A…

请假办宣誓手续未获批 服役青年痛失公民权

现年23岁的许姓青年,在服役期间得知需前往宣誓(ORAL)以保住公民权,为此向军队申请年假但未获批,致使他无法出营完成手续,过了宣誓期限而痛失公民权。 根据《联合晚报》报导,这名青年父亲是新加坡人,母亲泰籍。当年他是在母亲返泰探亲时出生,一个月后回狮城,取得新加坡公民权,自此一直在本国求学、成长。 许姓青年和其他人一样,他在两年前被征召入伍,在该年9月5日满21岁生日,收到移民局来信,称他是通过血缘与注册获得公民权的未成年公民,为此需在一年限期内,完成宣誓手续,正式成为公民。 许先生需前往泰国,办理证明放弃泰国国籍文件,再到泰国领事馆宣誓放弃泰公民权,需要花时间办理。这些都是在宣誓新加坡公民权时,需向移民局提交的文件。 许先生称,曾多次向军中请假但是都不被批准,致使错过宣誓期限。 国防部:青年未提交相关文件 不过,国防部否认许姓青年说辞,指出后者在服役期间,都不曾请假,也没有提交任何相关文件,为此才不批假期。直到去年7月,在许姓青年宣誓截止日前的两个月,许姓青年才开始申请假期。 许先生在军中担任负责培训新兵的组长,直到去年9月9日,这时已过了法定宣誓的期限。 国防部发言人称,如果许姓青年能提交相关文件,证明需请假前往宣誓,国防部必全力支持。 移民局则强调,宣誓文件必须在一年期限内处理,否则将丧失公民权。根据我国宪法,通过血缘或注册获得公民权的未成年青年,在年满21岁后,须在一年内完成宣誓公民手续。 在许姓青年年满22岁生日前六个月,移民局也再发函提醒。该局称,公民权乃严肃课题,一旦被褫夺,将很难再恢复公民身份。无论如何,该局仍在考量许姓青年的申请。 许姓青年:获公民权必贡献社会…

内政部拟设新机构 内政科技局着重开发监控、取证等科技

内政部拟设立新的法定机构–内政科技局。该部于昨日提呈《内政科技局草案》到国会一读。 草案涵括内政科技局的功能和职责范围,其中包括开发相关科技,加强内政团队捍卫新加坡的效率。 根据内政部昨日发出文告,监狱持续的恐怖主义威胁、且犯罪手法不断演变,内政部及其团队多年来致力提升其运营模式。 内政部将提升对于科技开发的投入,计划从2019财年的9.79亿新元,提升至2025年的19亿新元。而支持提升科技技术的关键举措,就是成立一个专门的科技机构。 内政部表示,长期以来都有和其他政府机构和工业领域伙伴合作,来加强内政团队能力,“我们希望与时并进,提升科技技术,故此需要专门机构来更有效地开发和拓展内政团队的能力。” 至于内政科技局,主要领导科技研发,将着重在研发与内政和执法团队工作密切相关的领域,例如感知监控(例如警方电眼计划POLCAM)、取证(罪案、毒品、造假文件、火灾等取证调查)、数码取证、”CBRNE”(化学、生物、辐射、核子和爆破)相关威胁、生物指纹、控制系统、数据分析、人工智能、机器人和无人系统等等。 内政科技局也可监督执法团队的采购程序,并整合和简化采购流程。 文告指出,内政科技局一开始将招募超过一千位科研、工程师和技术人才,协助开发工作,并且放眼发展尖端创新,让内政团队能更有效完成任务。 上述设立内政科技局的草案,将在八月在国会进行二读,并且拟定在今年12月正式成为内政部的法定机构。