By Jen –


Some of us know the difference between truth and half truth and the meaning of “spin” which is why we read carefully between the lines when it comes to news related to politics. For the uninitiated, spin is defined by Wikipedia as "a form of propaganda, achieved through providing an interpretation of an event or campaign to persuade public opinion in favor or against a certain organization or public figure. While traditional public relations may also rely on creative presentation of the facts, "spin" often, though not always, implies disingenuous, deceptive and/or highly manipulative tactics."

In the global political arena, what we often hear (especially from the more powerful/aggressive/deceptive politicians) falls somewhere along the continuum of truth and spin. But what does one call something that falls outside of spin and half-truth, sounds utterly unbelievable and is contrary to what we experience in reality?  Is there even any politically correct term for it? Or should we just call a spade a spade – that those politicians who say such incredulous stuff are either out of touch with reality or deliberately spinning a far-fetched tale for their own agenda.

Recently, many Singaporeans were stunned (to put it mildly) when Deputy Prime Minister Tharman said the "average Singapore" will not be affected by the high inflation after the latest set of Consumer Price Index (CPI) figures for March was announced. This led many Singaporeans to dispute this claim both in the mainstream media and online. The bigger shock came today when the news reports on what the Government said in Parliament yesterday regarding inflation raised even more disbelieving brows.

The TODAY newspaper's headline (15 May, 2012) screamed "Majority of Singaporeans will not be directly affected by inflation" while the Straits Times front page today quoted the Minister of State for Manpower Tan Chuan-Jin as saying "the Government does not expect the current high levels of inflation to persist in the years to come".

And the Government also took pains to point out in Parliament that the current food price increases (based on their CPI calculations) are nowhere near the peak of 2008 when prices soared nearly 8% due to bad weather and global shortage. I am not sure what their point of mentioning this was.  Was it to tell us to be thankful or was it a distraction tactic? So what if the prices shot up 8% in 2008 and the current increase is lower compared to back then? What consumers are fretting over is that prices are still rising since that sharp 8% increase! And if we were to compare with 5 years ago (2007), the price percentage increases would have gone up by much more isn't it?

Every average person whom I have talked to from the aunty who makes my favourite teh tarik to the taxi-driver say that they are feeling the pinch of inflation every single day. Most Singaporeans who pay their own bills would know just how hard inflation has hit them. The list of prices increase seems to get longer every day – the infamous housing and car/COE prices, the higher charges for public transportation (yes including taxis as they are a commonly used form of public transport), petrol, car-parking, healthcare, vitamins, medicine, groceries, food and electricity and water bills.

Adding to the confusion of "is inflation going up or easing off" are the different reports we have been reading in the media. Straits Times carried a report on May 8 with the headline: "Singapore inflation worrying: ING Bank economist". This senior economist had warned that inflation in Singapore may accelerate even faster if it is not capped at a reasonable rate. He highlighted inflation as a key worry for Singapore after the rise in the CPI hit 5.2 per cent in March.

On May 12th last week, ST ran another report with the headline "Prices likely to go up before adjusting".  It quoted various leading economists who held the common view that "Higher inflation is likely to stick around for a few years as Singapore's economy undergoes restructuring to raise productivity".  And in TODAY newspaper (published on May 15th), the report said the economists it had interviewed "disagreed" with the Government's view that most Singaporeans would not be directly affected by inflation. (here)

I have heard that with statistics, it's like a bikini, what you don't see or don't know is more interesting.  With all these contradictions, people are starting to question just how accurate is our Consumer Price Index and how is it computed? What goes into its basket of goods and how accurate is the weightage given to each item?

According to the CPI for March 2012, food inflation was only 2.7% – which doesn't jive with what many consumers are experiencing.  When questioned, the official explanation given was that the weights given to different types of food in the CPI basket are supposed to reflect the dining habits of the average Singaporean consumer, based on the results of a Household Expenditure Survey last conducted in 2007 and 2008. In addition, prepared meals account for around 60 per cent of the food basket in the current CPI. Based on this information, the basis for the CPI food inflation computation appears outdated. For one, that survey is too old and for another, I would have thought that the rate of eating out has gone up and people are cooking less at home due to their hectic work schedules.

Another bugbear for many of us is that the CPI excludes the cost of housing which would have pushed the index sky high if it were included. The official explanation for the exclusion? House purchases are excluded because they count as both a consumption expense and an investment expense. And the official rationale goes on that while consumers use the house for shelter, which counts as consumption, the house is also a capital asset that can be bought and sold later on (presumably at a profit?).

To quote Minister Lim Hng Kiang when explaining in Parliament why most of us ‘lucky’ folks will not be 'directly' affected by inflation: "The two largest contributors to CPI inflation are expected to be imputed rentals on owner-occupied accommodation and car prices. Together, they will account for more than half of the inflation this year. As the majority of resident households in Singapore own their homes, they do not actually incur rental expenditure. Likewise, the majority of resident households will not be directly affected by the rise in COE premiums as new car buyers make up a small proportion of all resident households. "

What was that again? I am not versed in political speak but I think he is trying to say – "You own a house you are ok, you don’t own a car you are also ok?” Hmm, what about those who can't afford to own a house? What about the young people who are worrying if they can afford to buy their dream home in future? What about the higher cost of almost everything from food to healthcare? What about the daily bills that many are struggling to pay? And aren't Singaporean car owners citizens too?

So many questions and so few answers. Is inflation easing or climbing higher? Are most Singaporeans affected by inflation or are we not? Who should we believe – the economists or the politicians?

I don't know about my fellow Singaporeans but I am not swallowing any spin or numbers that don't add up.  Meantime, I will continue to trust what I can see and what I am paying everyday out of my own pocket.

This commentary first appeared on Jentrified Citizen Blog. TOC thanks Jen for allowing us to reproduce in full.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lady hit by falling glass door at Alexandra Central Mall run by grassroots leaders

It was recently reported in the media that a lady was hit…

有意大利籍乘客 遭马、泰拒绝靠岸游轮提早返新

一艘被泰国和马来西亚政府拒绝靠岸的意大利游轮,目前已提早返航,预计明日(10日)抵达新加坡。 根据新加坡海事及港务管理局(MPA)今日(9日)发布的文告,有关游轮歌诗达幸运号(Costa Fortuna)刚在本月3日从新加坡离开,且乘客再登船前,都已根据游轮管理层要求,进行离境前检查旅行记录和体温检测。 文告也指该游轮已在海事健康声明(Maritime Declaration of Health)申报,其乘客目前均未出现发热或其他呼吸道疾病症状。 “在登船前,船上医生会检查乘客和船员的健康。至于所有进入新加坡的乘客需进行体温检测。” 至于出现发烧或其他呼吸道症状的乘客,将需要进行COVID-19拭子测试(swab test),若拒绝测试则不得进入我国。 据了解该游轮上有64名意大利籍乘客。由于马国和泰国不准该游轮靠岸,致使游轮无法前往泰国普吉岛和槟城停留,只得提前返航。 至于歌诗达幸运号的公司歌诗达(Costa…

蟑螂苍蝇滋生!污水滴落食材 餐饮公司遭罚五千元

新加坡食品局(Singapore Food Agency)稽查餐饮公司AG(Global)Event Catering ,发现现场蟑螂与苍蝇滋生、未盖好的生鲜食品置于地上、污水从天花板滴在材料上等卫生缺失,因此罚款该公司5000新元。 这是自新加坡食品局新成立以来,首个被揭发卫生指标不达标的餐饮公司。 据悉,涉案的公司AG(Global)Events Catering,专为提供熟食外卖服务,位于海军部食品城Food Xchange@Admiralty五楼。 根据《海峡时报》报导,食品局于6月19日无预警稽查,发现公司的厨房、储藏室、备用食材处内充满蟑螂与苍蝇,卫生环境缺失。其次,该公司也涉嫌不当存放食材及环境维护不良的违规行为。 文告表示,食品局也发现该公司将冷冻食材放进温室里解冻,地板与墙砖的裂缝导致污水滴落生鲜食材上,导致食品受到污染。此外,工作人员更是随意将食材置于地板上。对此,食品局亦发出暂停营业执照27天,并下令必须采取改善措施整顿场所。 根据网上资料,涉案的公司成立于2011年,公司网站宣称专门为酒店、政府部门、企业公司和住家提供活动餐饮外送服务。…

离开马国护照没盖章 夫妇险“非法出境”

我们常在出国时听到身边人叮咛,护照必须带着。岂知,现在要变成,出境时必须确保护照有盖章,盖章上的日期要对,否则就算有护照,一样惹上官司。一对夫妇回到新加坡时,却在马国出境时,护照上没有盖章,被冤枉成“非法出境”。 有关的狮城夫妇,郑美贤(49岁)和丈夫日前开车到马国,接了家人准备回国。出境柔佛时,发现关卡人员并没有为他们夫妇俩的护照盖章。 当时车上五人,郑美贤和丈夫,以及小叔都持有新加坡护照。他们在下午一两点过马来西亚关卡后,开始检查所有护照,却发现,只有女事主和其丈夫的护照没有被盖章。 他们当时不断翻找离境的盖章,塞车45分钟过去了,还是依然没有找到。 亲友建议重办护照 女事主表示,基于没有盖章,成为“非法出境”,因此她的亲友都建议她重办护照,否则不能再次入境马来西亚。 她指出,当时原本计划带着家人到马来西亚云顶度假,甚至已经订好酒店了,但是因为担心再去马来西亚会有麻烦,所以取消行程。 女事主随后拨电向当局询问,期盼有更好的解决方法。“据我了解,出境除了盖章,还有扫描护照。” 她指出,当局表示,系统应该有她和丈夫的处境资料,因此建议她到驻新加坡的马国大使馆求助,以便解决此问题。 护照上盖错出境日期 此前,《新明日报》也曾报道一名我国男子到马国游玩时,护照上盖错了出境盖章的日期,盖成了隔日的出境日期。 男子当时和朋友出境,看到护照的盖章“有问题”,曾表示要朋友停车,让他回到柜台解释和纠正错误。但是其友人表示害怕会被引起误会,惹来麻烦,因此拒绝停车。他唯有直接离开关卡。…