It was reported by the media yesterday (14 Nov) that Singtel posted its first quarterly loss of S$668 million in its 2Q result ending 30 Sep (‘Singtel posts first quarterly loss of S$668m on Airtel provision‘).
This was primarily due to provision made for huge losses incurred by Bharti Airtel, the Indian telco which Singtel invested in. Excluding Airtel, net profit of Singtel would have been positive, up 4 per cent. Singtel and GIC owned about 40% stake in Airtel.
Airtel was impacted by an adverse Indian court ruling against the telecom industry in India last month. In the interim, Airtel has recorded an exceptional provision this quarter of approximately S$5.49 billion of losses. Singtel’s proportionate share of this provision amounted to S$1.93 billion pre-tax.
The Indian court ruling was finally announced last month after 20 years of legal dispute over air wave fees the Indian telcos need to pay the government. The operators have disputed for years over how the Indian government calculates their annual adjusted gross revenue, a share of which is paid as license and spectrum fees.
With the ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the government’s method, while rejecting the companies’ plea to exclude revenue from non-telecommunications businesses. As a result, Airtel would need to pay the Indian government 217 billion rupees (US$3 billion).
Moody’s downgrades Bharti Airtel which runs up huge debt
In Aug, Singtel already reported a 35 per cent drop in its 1Q net profit largely dragged down by Airtel’s losses. Singtel posted a net profit of S$541 million for the three months ended in June, compared with S$832 million a year ago. So, with the net loss of S$668 million in 2Q, the total net profit of Singtel in the first half of its FY would be negative.
Earlier in March this year, it was reported that Singapore’s GIC will invest Rs5,000 crore (S$972 million) into the troubled Airtel. It came as Airtel decided to announce plans to raise nearly Rs32,000 crore (S$6.2 billion) through a combination of rights issue and perpetual bonds.
The fundraising was to help reduce Airtel’s current massive net debt estimated to be Rs 1.06 lakh crore (S$21 billion) as at end of last year. Singtel has renounced part of its rights to be picked up by GIC. As a result, Singtel’s stake in the Airtel will fall to 35.2% while GIC will own about 4.4% for the first time. In any case, Singtel announced that it will buy roughly 37.5 billion rupees (S$730 million) worth of Airtel stock as part of Airtel’s plan to raise the massive S$6.2 billion in order to cut its huge debt.
Due to the massive debt, Airtel’s credit rating was downgraded for the first time by Moody’s to below investment grade status in Feb. Airtel’s bruising tariff war with India’s newest wireless operator Reliance Jio also continues to hurt its revenue and profitability. “The downgrade reflects uncertainty as to whether or not the company’s profitability, cash flow situation and debt levels can improve sustainably and materially, given the competitive dynamics in the Indian telecom market,” Moody’s said.
Moody’s expects Airtel’s profitability to remain low over the next few quarters. It noted that though the company’s debt levels may decline due to capital raising initiatives, like the one Singtel and GIC had invested into Airtel in March, weaker cash flow generation of the core mobile operations will likely keep leverage elevated. For the first time in the last 15 years, Airtel has generated negative cash flows this year.
No doubt, Airtel’s negative cash flows will surely hurt its earnings, which undoubtedly will drag Singtel’s earnings down further. But Singtel CEO Chua Sock Koong remains positive. She said that notwithstanding the court ruling, “Airtel has made positive strides in the wake of the recent industry consolidation, gaining market share, and increasing mobile service revenue for a third straight quarter”.
Singapore able to invest in India thanks to CECA negotiated by Heng and team

Thanks to the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), Singapore entities like Singtel and GIC are now able to invest in India with less restrictions.
For example, according to CECA information kit, investments into India are not required to seek foreign investment approval generally. Also, investors are allowed to freely transfer funds related to their investments, such as capital, profits, dividends and royalties. CECA also formally recognised Temasek and GIC as distinct entities, and they are allowed to each own up to 10% of a listed Indian company, similar to other Foreign Institutional Investors.
Under CECA, it also enables Singapore and India to trade goods freely, and allows professionals to work in each other country more easily.
Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat who was then Permanent Secretary for Trade and Industry led the Singapore side to conclude CECA with India after 13 rounds of talks. Heng and his team essentially did the ground work together with their Indian counterparts before presenting their proposals to the politicians for approval.

Areas covered by CECA include: Improved Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement, Trade in Goods, Customs, Investment, Trade in Services, Intellectual Property, etc.
However, controversial ones like concluding further Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) so as to facilitate the freer movement of professionals between Singapore and India are also present in CECA. It helps to recognise each other’s education and professional qualifications so that Indian and Singaporean professionals could be able to practise in each other country.
Then there are clauses which permit “intra-company transferees” to easily work in each other country. An employee needs only be recruited by a company for as little as 6 months to be considered for transfer. Some politicians may argue that CECA would also benefit Singaporeans wanting to work in India but the question is – how many Singaporeans would want to work there earning in rupees?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

高速行驶撞倒男孩致臼齿脱落 19岁电动滑板车骑士面控

去年在义顺,所驾驶的电动滑板车撞倒了一名12岁的男子,19岁青少年今天(11月27日)被控上庭。 被告林纯贤(Brendon Lim Chun Hsien,译音)被指控于去年3月28日傍晚6时,在义顺81号街838栋组屋旁的篮球场上,以约20公里的高速骑着电动踏板车,撞倒了男孩。 控状中指出,当男孩走入他的路线中时,被告并没有放慢速度,将男孩撞得身有瘀伤,且臼齿脱落。 警方是于2018年3月29日上午11时,接获有关事件的投报。 当局在周二(11月26日)晚上的发布会上指出,“报案时,受害者的右颊有瘀伤和擦伤,右上方的第一颗臼齿周围出血”。 宏茂桥警察局的警员在接获投报后,识别了被告并将其逮捕。 据法庭了解,被告将根据刑事法律援助计划(Criminal Legal Aid…

Minister Ng: My household saves 25% on grocery bills by buying FairPrice house brand products

It was reported in the media yesterday (19 Mar) that NTUC FairPrice…

承认四度收取偷窃燃油 越南籍油槽船大副入狱两年半

我国毛广岛(Pulau Bukom)蚬壳公司炼油厂偷油事件,收取“贼赃”的油槽船大副成为昨日(7月11日)被带上庭处理的首名被告,被判两年半的监禁。 去年1月7日,警方在一次行动中,将包括唐文汉(38岁,译音Dang Van Hanh)在内的8名前蚬壳员工和其他员工逮捕。 拥有越南国籍的他,承认曾经四度收取重达5592公吨,总值约259万美元(约350万新元)的被盗燃油。 检察官表示,调查发现也是偷油团伙的两名蚬壳员工,在毛广岛以前所未有的规模窃取燃油。 蚬壳在该岛经营者一家炼油厂,是亚太地区最大的炼油生产和出口中心。 检察官指出,作为偷油计划的一部分,两艘越南船只将进入该炼油厂中,接受合法购买的燃油。但是,他们也采纳蚬壳员工透过其他人的安排,接收他们所盗取的燃油。 警方是接到蚬壳代表于2017年8月进行投报后,开始调查该公司当月4月份损失将近298万新元的燃油。 偷窃燃油可追溯至2014年 去年12月的一项报告显示,总值约1.5亿美元(约2.06亿新元)的炼油厂偷油事件,可追溯到2014年。…

Workers’ Party May Day Message: Greater protections and preparation for workers needed to weather the storms ahead

In his May Day message, Pritam Singh, Leader of the Opposition and Secretary General of the Workers’ Party, emphasized the need for enhanced support and preparation for Singaporean workers facing economic challenges and AI advancements. Mr Singh urged the government to implement a redundancy insurance scheme and highlighted the importance of leveraging AI innovations to boost worker productivity and pay, ensuring a brighter future for Singapore’s workforce.