At the ASEAN summit in Bangkok on Monday (4 Nov), India announced that it will opt out of the RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) Agreement.

Indian PM Narendra Modi said that India was dropping out of the agreement, citing its negative effects on India. “The present form of the RCEP Agreement does not fully reflect the basic spirit and the agreed guiding principles of RCEP. It also does not address satisfactorily India’s outstanding issues and concerns. In such a situation, it is not possible for India to join RCEP Agreement,” he told leaders of the other 15 nations in Bangkok.

The summit included China, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, and the 10-nation ASEAN countries.

“When I measure the RCEP Agreement with respect to the interests of all Indians, I do not get a positive answer. Therefore, neither the talisman of Gandhiji nor my own conscience permit me to join RCEP,” Modi added, referring to the stakes of Indian farmers, traders, professionals and industrialists, all of whom have protested against RECP.

When asked whether India might consider joining RCEP at a later date, an Indian MEA official said, “Not as the agreement stands today.”

Sources said Indian officials, who had hoped for consensus on pushing the timelines on an agreement to next year, reacted angrily to the joint statement, and stormy scenes were reportedly witnessed over the wording of the statement. The Indian officials also accused the other nations of attempting to “gang up” in an attempt to force India to toe the line on some of the issues which India has wanted like safeguards against flooding of Chinese goods, allowing Indian labour mobility to other countries for services, and agricultural and dairy tariffs.

PM Lee: Hope one day India will join RCEP

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told reporters that with 15 economies on board (without India), the agreement was a substantial one. He said he understood India’s decision to “not yet” join in.
“It’s a pity that India is not yet on board, we hope one day it will come on board. But nevertheless, this is a very major step forward for the RCEP – tremendous progress for which we have to thank the negotiators from all of the countries,” said Mr Lee.

He also said he understands India’s position. “And there’s no anxiety or rancour… We fully understand and appreciate India’s point of view. They have made that decision. We respect that decision,” he added.

“We hope one day that it will be possible, either because we can overcome the specific issues that are outstanding or India takes a different perspective, (for us to) come together and India will be part of the group,” Mr Lee said. “If possible, it happens by next year then everybody can sign.”

Issues on market access as well as some “technicalities” had meant that India did not agree to the deal, he revealed.

India has long been pushing for other countries to allow greater movement of labor and services in return for opening its market. Obviously, India didn’t get what it had wanted among other things.

India gets what it wanted in CECA

In any case, India did get what it wanted by signing the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) with Singapore.

In return for allowing more investments by Singapore in India, CECA permits movement of professionals between India and Singapore. For example, professionals from 1 country employed in 127 specific occupations will be allowed entry and stay for up to 1 year or the duration of contract, whichever is less, in the other country.

Intra-corporate transferees (i.e. managers, executives and specialists within organisations) will also be permitted to stay and work in India and Singapore for an initial period of up to 2 years or the period of the contract, whichever is less. The period of stay may be extended for period of up to 3 years at a time for a total term not exceeding 8 years.

Indeed, many Indian software houses do transfer their staff from India to work in their subsidiaries here in Singapore, with many operating out from Changi Business Park.

Under CECA, the movement of people between the 2 countries does not apply to immigration measures as long as these immigration measures do not nullify or impair the commitments made by either country.

“With freer movement of business persons between countries, bilateral trade and investment flows should be significantly enhanced. Hence, companies from both countries can leverage on the chapter to drive greater economic integration between India and Singapore,” CECA stated.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】警犬单位95人接受检测 仅一人确诊冠病19

本月13日,一名警犬单位兽医助理确诊。为此卫生部也随即展开检测行动,单位内包括行政人员在内,共95名工作人员,都要接受冠病19检测。 所幸检测后,证实确诊者仅为本月16日确诊的一名行政人员。不过,曾近接触兽医助理及该名行政人员的人士,都已被隔离。 这名兽医助理为32岁新加坡男子,工作上是配合警犬训练员,为警犬远程视讯问诊。 兽医助理在出现症状前,曾接触25只警犬,为此他们也得接受检测,警方证实所有警犬检测结果呈阴性。 与警犬单位感染群有关的病例共七例,包括兽医助理和行政人员的妻子,以及行政人员儿子。

裘佐柏:论尚达曼的“神奇社会扶梯”去了哪?

本月13日(昨日)《海峡时报》报导,国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼,赴伦敦出席一项活动时表示,决策者必须谨记于心,在规划基本经济和社会政策,社会需要一个确保所有人都往上移的“电动扶梯”。 他强调,必须关注贫富不均和社会流动性,而应对这两大课题的最佳方案,就是确保收入和社会流动的绝对增长,让所有人都能一起向上,达成更优质的生活。 “如果这个电扶梯静止不动,就很难解决不均和促进社会流动… 我们需要的是会向上移动的扶梯,”他是在伦敦的英国政府智囊机构(British think-tank Institute for Government)十周年论坛上,向与会的百位嘉宾如是阐述他的社会政策观。 然而,本地律师兼知名时评人裘佐柏就揶揄,就他所见许多普通老百姓,并没有“向上移动”,所以不知尚达曼的经济扶梯论,是要带大家移动到哪? 裘佐柏是一名致力推动建设性改革的非执业律师,公认为是一名受瞩目的国内时事评论员之一,也勇于对他认为正确的信念站出来发声。 经济增长的神奇扶梯 他直言,对于社会和收入不均问题,人民行动党政府最重要的拆招手段就是“确保扶梯继续向上”,这是他们“经济增长的神奇扶梯”,足以把贫富不均变成历史。…

Global Compact Network Indonesia brings together Asia Pulp & Paper and Martha Tilaar Group to train and empower 1,000 women from tropical forest communities

The Indonesian Network of the United Nations Global Compact (UN Global Compact)…

M’sia PM Muhyiddin Yassin: EPF contributors can now withdraw RM500 monthly for one year

All Employees Provident Fund (EPF) contributors under the age of 55 can…