Veteran architect and Adjunct Professor at the Department of Architect at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Tay Kheng Soon took to his Facebook on Sunday (13 October) to slam the poor design of footpaths in the country.
In his post, he uploaded a picture of a sidewalk and said that it is a “bad design” as almost a meter of the sidewalk is wasted.
“If the pillars are planted on top of the retaining wall and the open drain is covered, the footpath will be that much wider at very little extra cost,” he suggested.

A few minutes later, the renowned architect took to his Facebook again to upload another image of a different footpath, which he opines has a “much better design”.
“This is a much better design where there is more space. The pillars are at the edge and don’t have an unnecessary bulky base,” he wrote.

 
A Facebook page called “Singaporeans supporting the government because of covered walkways” also shared Prof Tay’s post and mocked the poor design.
For those who are not aware, this page is a satire on how sheltered pathways are presented by the Government as a election goodie to win votes.
In its post, it wrote: “This cannot do!! This is borderline blasphemy to our scared covered walkways !! Almost 1 metre has been reduced to the walkable area and we have to share this same narrower path with marauding PMDs !!!” sarcastically insulting the bad design by the Government.

However, it’s important to note that the poor design of pedestrian walkways that Prof Tay highlighted in his first post is very common in the country. It is built in such a way because the overhead shelter is usually constructed after the pavement is built.
The construction of covered walkways involve multiple agencies. The Land Transport Authority (LTA) builds and maintains covered walkways which connects transport nodes to nearby amenities as well as maintains covered linkways within road reserves or on state land.
On the other hand, Housing and Development Board (HDB) offers covered walkways between residential blocks to precinct facilities such as multi-storey car parks when designing new developments. However after these are constructed, the town council maintains them and they can opt to build more walkways using its own funds, or by taking from HDB’s Remarking Our Heartland programme or Neighbourhood Renewal Programme.
As such, we wonder if shelters are such an important element to the town’s infrastructure, why don’t the HDB plan the sheltered walkways when they first build the estate, instead of having the town council to build the much needed sheltered walkways later on?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

因脸书分享一贴文 时评人梁实轩遭总理提控诽谤

因为在个人脸书专页分享一篇文章惹祸,本地知名时评人、金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩,遭总理李显龙提告诽谤。 梁实轩是在11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 据了解,资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)在11月6日致函梁实轩,指其文章违反网络行为准则,要求后者在六小时内撤下有关文章。梁实轩也遵守IMDA的要求。 《网络公民》查询其他也分享同一篇文章的网民,却没有收到资媒局的警告信。 在11月12日,德尊(新加坡)法律事务所致函梁实轩,要求他对总理李显龙公开道歉,并赔偿后者名誉损失。 信函称:“这些指控都是不实和无根据的,对我们的客户造成严重诽谤,诋毁他的人格、信誉和诚信,”由资深律师达文星领导的李显龙律师团队,认为梁实轩发布的贴文,明显含有“恶意损害其客户”的成分。 根据《海峡时报》报导,法庭文件指文章中“意味且可被理解为,原告腐败地滥用总理职务,帮助纳吉清洗一马公司的数十亿元资金。” 作为单一的个案,梁实轩的脸书贴文被指含有诽谤词语“意味且可被理解为,原告与一马公司弊案的犯罪活动同谋。” 李显龙的代表律师称,这些词语“不实且毫无根据,并且有意诋毁身为总理的原告。”…

SDP’s Dr Paul Tambyah responds to the proposed amendments of MediShield Life

Previously on 29 September, the Ministry of Health had released a press…

巴西称科兴生物疫苗效能仅50.4% 颜金勇:疫苗效果有待检讨

卫生部长颜金勇周三(13日)表示,北京科兴生物公司(Sinovac)的疫苗,将会经过新加坡卫生科学局的监管和审查才会上市。 日前,有巴西媒体报道称,科兴生物公司的疫苗效能仅50.4巴仙,明显低于先前的宣布的78巴仙的数据。 据研究所的报告,此前78巴仙的“临床有效率”是考虑了轻、中、重度病例,但如果将志愿者中出现“非常轻微”症状的患者纳入在内,新的“总体有效率”数字是50.4巴仙。这些人不需要医疗援助。 研究人员强调,该疫苗在预防需要治疗的轻症病例方面的有效率仍是78巴仙,在中度至重度病例方面的有效率为100巴仙。 对此,颜金勇在昨日(14日)在广惠肇留医院接受疫苗接种后,表示政府迄今仍未批准该疫苗,并指会谨慎研究数据。 “我们还未批准科兴生物的疫苗,正如我在国会中所说,我们还在等待更多的数据,之后就会仔细研究。与其依赖报道中的数据,我们会采纳科兴生物提交的正式数据。一旦收到这些数据,卫生科学局会进行评估,疫苗专家团之后也会评估看疫苗是否适用于本地的接种计划。” 他也补充道,专家委员会也将会评估疫苗,确定疫苗的适用性。 颜金勇曾于1月4日国会上答复盛港集选区议员蔡庆威的问题,指人民不允许选择自己想要接种的疫苗,是因为不需要将本已复杂的接种程序复杂化。 然而,颜金勇也强调,如今政府唯一批准使用的疫苗为辉瑞疫苗。 黄循财也重申,任何疫苗在获准使用前都必须经过卫生科学局的评估,一旦其他疫苗获得批准,当局也会将其纳入接种计划。 其中,辉瑞和莫德纳的技术和效能相似,因此没有选择的必要,科兴疫苗的技术和效能不同,当局将对其进行全面评估,决定它是否更适用于特定族群。

PSP intends to push for a minimum living wage, review of employment policy, and a bottom-up approach to economic development – Leong Mun Wai

The key message of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) is to “progress…